Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective Analyses of Frequent Emergency Department Users

Pages
89–93
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, frequent users are a very heterogeneous patient group and more research is needed to better understand the factors leading to frequent ED use and to develop effective strategies to meet patients’ complex health care needs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Emergency department (ED) demand and overcrowding is increasing worldwide, and a significant portion of this overcrowding is caused by ‘‘frequent users’’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study is to define the characteristics of this group of patients who contribute towards a disproportionate number of ED visits.Materials and Methods: All ED visits during a 1-year period between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively investigated using the electronic registration system of the hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, frequent users are a very heterogeneous patient group and more research is needed to better understand the factors leading to frequent ED use and to develop effective strategies to meet patients’ complex health care needs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Emergency department (ED) demand and overcrowding is increasing worldwide, and a significant portion of this overcrowding is caused by ‘‘frequent users’’. The aim of the study is to define the characteristics of this group of patients who contribute towards a disproportionate number of ED visits.Materials and Methods: All ED visits during a 1-year period between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively investigated using the electronic registration system of the hospital. Patients who visited the ED ≥4 times in this period were considered as ‘‘frequent users’’. Social history, disease and care-related factors of frequent users were investigated.Results: A total of 335,457 ED visits made in a calendar year (2018) were investigated. Frequents users comprised 6.8% of all ED patient population and 22.9% of all ED visits. Female gender proportion was greater among frequent users, and frequent users were younger than occasional users. Yellow/red triage code ratio was higher and the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the frequent users group. The proportion of uninsured patients was two times higher in the frequent users group, and half of these patients were immigrants or refugees.Conclusion: Frequent users place a significant burden on the increasing patient volume in EDs. Welfare status was an important indicator for being a frequent user. However, frequent users are a very heterogeneous patient group and more research is needed to better understand the factors leading to frequent ED use and to develop effective strategies to meet patients’ complex health care needs.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİK, Y., IŞIK, G. Ç., TANDOĞAN, M., ŞAFAK, T. (2022). Retrospective Analyses of Frequent Emergency Department Users. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 89–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/507963

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ko M, Lee Y, Chen C, Chou P, Chu D. Prevalence of and Predictors for Frequent Utilization of Emergency Department: A Population-Based Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1205
  2. Nambiar D, Stoové M, Dietze P. Frequent emergency department presentations among people who inject drugs: A record linkage study. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;44:115-20
  3. Burns TR. Contributing factors of frequent use of the emergency department: A synthesis. Int Emerg Nurs. 2017;35:51-5
  4. Solakoglu GA, Karakilic ME, Aciksari K. Frequent attenders to emergency department in a research hospital in Turkey. Medeniyet Medical Journal. 2018;33: 158-66. 5. van Tiel S, Rood PP, Bertoli-Avella AM, Erasmus V, Haagsma J, van Beeck E, et al. Systematic review of frequent users of emergency departments in non-US hospitals: state of the art. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015;22:306-15
  5. Birmingham LE, Cochran T, Frey JA, Stiffler KA, Wilber ST. Emergency department use and barriers to wellness: a survey of emergency department frequent users. BMC Emerg Med. 2017;17:16
  6. Norman C, Mello M, Choi B. Identifying Frequent Users of an Urban Emergency Medical Service Using Descriptive Statistics and Regression Analyses. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17:39-45
  7. Castillo EM, Brennan JJ, Killeen JP, Chan TC. Identifying frequent users of emergency department resources. J Emerg Med. 2014;47:343-7
  8. Kanzaria HK, Niedzwiecki MJ, Montoy JC, Raven MC, Hsia RY. Persistent Frequent Emergency Department Use: Core Group Exhibits Extreme Levels Of Use For More Than A Decade. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36:1720-8
  9. Acosta AM, Lima MA. Frequent users of emergency services: associated factors and reasons for seeking care. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015;23:337-44
  10. LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:42-8
  11. Krieg C, Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Dufour I. Individual predictors of frequent emergency department use: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:594
  12. Moe J, Kirkland S, Ospina MB, Campbell S, Long R, Davidson A, et al. Mortality, admission rates and outpatient use among frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:230-6
  13. Bieler G, Paroz S, Faouzi M, Trueb L, Vaucher P, Althaus F, et al. Social and medical vulnerability factors of emergency department frequent users in a universal health insurance system. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:63-8
  14. Saunders NR, To T, Parkin PC, Gu