Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio to Differentiate Simple Versus Complicated Appendicitis

Pages
178–183
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The cut-off point of the CRP/albumin ratio for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis was 4.4.Conclusion: The CRP/albumin ratio may be used as a valuable biomarker in the clinical diagnostic process and in treatment planning,particularly to differentiate patients with acute complicated appendicitis from those with non-complicated acute appendicitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio is a new inflammation-based prognostic score that correlates with inflammation severity.Objective: The present study investigated the diagnostic value of the CRP/albumin ratio to distinguish between patients with simple andcomplicated acute appendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This retrospective study was conducted at the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kanuni Sultan SüleymanTraining and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, after approval from the ethics committee.Materials and Methods: A total of 188 patients with acute appendicitis were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The cut-off point of the CRP/albumin ratio for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis was 4.4.Conclusion: The CRP/albumin ratio may be used as a valuable biomarker in the clinical diagnostic process and in treatment planning,particularly to differentiate patients with acute complicated appendicitis from those with non-complicated acute appendicitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio is a new inflammation-based prognostic score that correlates with inflammation severity.Objective: The present study investigated the diagnostic value of the CRP/albumin ratio to distinguish between patients with simple andcomplicated acute appendicitis. This retrospective study was conducted at the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kanuni Sultan SüleymanTraining and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, after approval from the ethics committee.Materials and Methods: A total of 188 patients with acute appendicitis were included. Biochemical parameters, CRP/albumin ratio,ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) results, operation findings and length of hospital-stay were compared betweenpatients with simple and complicated appendicitis.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in terms of leukocyte count, albumin value and diameter of the appendicitis betweenboth USG and CT. The CRP/albumin ratio could specifically differentiate the complicated appendicitis group. The cut-off point of the CRP/albumin ratio for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis was 4.4.Conclusion: The CRP/albumin ratio may be used as a valuable biomarker in the clinical diagnostic process and in treatment planning,particularly to differentiate patients with acute complicated appendicitis from those with non-complicated acute appendicitis.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, S., DÖRTER, M., KALAFAT, U. M., BİLDİK, B., YAZICI, R., SARICI, İ. Ş., CANDER, B. (2022). Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio to Differentiate Simple Versus Complicated Appendicitis. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 178–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/507961

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, Shapiro NI. Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:859-71
  2. Keskek M, Tez M, Yoldas O, Acar A, Akgul O, Gocmen E, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of leukocyte counts in operations for suspected appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:769-72
  3. Guler K, Tihan DN, Duman U, Dandin Ö, Dilektaşlı E, Erol F, et al. Are Preoperative serum C-reactive Protein and Leucocyte Values Useful to Predict the Perforation in Patients with Acute Appendicitis? Turk J Colorectal Dis. 2016;26:6-12
  4. Nimmagadda N, Matsushima K, Piccinini A, Park C, Strumwasser A, Lam L, et al. Complicated appendicitis: Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management? Am J Surg. 2019;217:713-7
  5. Devran O, Karakurt Z, Adıguzel N, Güngör G, Yazıcıoğlu Moçin O, Kalamanoğlu Balcı M, et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of mortality in patients affected with severe sepsis in intensive care unit. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012;7:47
  6. Soltani F, Pipelzadeh MR, Akhondzadeh R, Rashidi M, Ekrami A. Evaluation of C-reactive Protein, Albumin and the C-reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as Prognostic Markers in Trauma Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit. BJMMR. 2016;12:1-7
  7. Roberts I, Blackhall K, Alderson P, Bunn F, Schierhoutet G. Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001208
  8. Kim M, Kim SJ, Cho HJ. International normalized ratio and serum C-reactive protein are feasible markers to predict complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:31
  9. D’Souza N, Nugent K. Appendicitis. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93:142-3
  10. Jaffe BM, Berger DH. The appendix. In: Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, 8th ed, Schwartz SI, Brunicardi CF editors, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York; 2005
  11. McBurney C. Experience with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. NY Med J. 1889;50:676
  12. Jahn H, Mathiesen FK, Neckelmann K, Hovendal CP, Bellstrøm T, Gottrup F. Comparison of clinical judgment and diagnostic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: experience with a score-aided diagnosis. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:433-43
  13. Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:139
  14. Yun SJ, Ryu CW, Choi NY, Kim HC, Oh JY, Yang DM. Comparison of Low- and Stand