Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Emergency Medical Services Cases in Different Types of Mass Gathering Events Held Between 2015-2018 in Turkey

Pages
93–99
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As a result, differences in PPR and TTHR rates are observed in different types of MG.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) cases in some mass gatherings held in Turkey between the years of 2015-2018 and to compare the patient presentation rate (PPR) and transport to hospital rate (TTHR) rates of different types of mass gatherings (MGs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the study consists of 112 EMS records of the Commemoration Events of the Çanakkale Land Warfare (CEÇLW), Zeytinli Rock Festival (ZRF), Summer Deaflympics (DEAFLYMPICS) and European Youth Olympic Winter Festival (EYOF) organizations held in Turkey between the years of 2015-2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As a result, differences in PPR and TTHR rates are observed in different types of MG.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) cases in some mass gatherings held in Turkey between the years of 2015-2018 and to compare the patient presentation rate (PPR) and transport to hospital rate (TTHR) rates of different types of mass gatherings (MGs). Materials and Methods: The research is a descriptive cross-sectional epidemiological study. The population of the study consists of 112 EMS records of the Commemoration Events of the Çanakkale Land Warfare (CEÇLW), Zeytinli Rock Festival (ZRF), Summer Deaflympics (DEAFLYMPICS) and European Youth Olympic Winter Festival (EYOF) organizations held in Turkey between the years of 2015-2018. Results: The hours of 12:00 p.m. - 05:59 p.m. (34.0%, n=161). 57.4% (n=272) of the cases were due to medical 474 EMS cases were examined in the study. 49.5% (n=235) of the cases were in DEAFLYMPICS and 57.6% (n=273) of the cases were male. The mean age of the cases was 30.3±16.5 (minimum: 0, maximum: 92). Most cases occurred between reasons. According to the triage codes, 57.7% (n=153) of the cases were green, 32.3% (n=153) were red and 15.8% (n=75) were yellow. When the results of the cases were analyzed, 54.0% (n=256) of the cases were transferred to hospital, 20.7% (n=98) were on-site intervention and 14.1% were refusal of transfer. Conclusion: As a result, differences in PPR and TTHR rates are observed in different types of MG.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCAY, İ., KOÇAK, H. (2022). Comparison of Emergency Medical Services Cases in Different Types of Mass Gathering Events Held Between 2015-2018 in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 93–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/507897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Murray V, Soomaroo L. Disasters at mass gatherings: lessons from history. PLoS Currents. 2012;4:RRN1301
  2. Wallis L, Smith W. Emergency Preparedness: Mass Gatherings. In: Nurbeam T, Boylan M, editors. ABC of Prehospital Emergency Medicine. West Sussex, UK: Johns Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2016. p. 190-4
  3. Molloy MS, Sherif Z, Natin S, McDonnell J. Management of Mass Gatherings. In: Koenig KL, Schultz CH, editors. Koenig and Schultz’s Disaster Medicine Comprehensive Priciples and Practices Disaster Medicine Comprehensive Priciples and Practices. First. USA: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 228- 50
  4. Marino P, Albergoni E, Andreassi A, Chiodini G. Mass gatherings in Italy: a study from the 2015 Milan Expo. J Health Soc Sci. 2016;1:91-8
  5. Tam JS, Barbeschi M, Shapovalova N, Briand S, Memish ZA, Kieny MP. Research agenda for mass gatherings: A call to action. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:231-9
  6. Arbon P. Planning medical coverage for mass gatherings in Australia: What we currently know. J Emerg Nurs. 2005;31:346-50
  7. Aljohani M, Kennedy KE. Mass gatherings. In: Keystone JS, Freedman DO, Kozarsky P, Connor, Bradley CA, Nothdurft HD, editors. Ciottone’s Disaster Medicine. 2nd ed. China: Elsevier Inc.; 2015. p. 968-74
  8. Wilder-Smith A, Steffen R. Mass Gatherings. 2nd ed. Travel Medicine: Third Edition. Elsevier Inc.; 2012. p. 357-9
  9. Soomaroo L, Murray V. Weather and environmental hazards at mass gatherings. PLoS Currents. doi: 10.1371/4fca9ee30afc4 10. Locoh-Donou S, Guofen Y, Welcher M, Berry T, O’Connor RE, Brady WJ, et al. Mass-gathering medicine: A descriptive analysis of a range of mass-gathering event types. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:843-6
  10. Demott JM, Hebert CL, Novak M, Mahmood S, Peksa GD. Characteristics and resource utilization of patients presenting to the emergency department from mass gathering events. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:983-7
  11. Brown JF, Smith JG, Tataris K. Medical management of mass gatherings. In: Cone DC, Brice JH, Delbridge TR, Myers JB, editors. Emergency Medical Services: Clinical Practice and Systems Oversight, Clinical Aspects of EMS. 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.; 2015. p. 264-71
  12. Koçak H, Çalışkan C, Sönmezler MŞ, Eliuz K, Küçükdurmaz F. Analysis of Medical Responses in Mass Gatherings: The Commemoration Ceremonies for the 100th Anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33:288-92
  13. Alquthami AH, Pines JM. A Systematic review of noncommunicable health ıssues in mass