Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with the Suspect of Acute Renal Colic with the Modified STONE Score

Pages
138–145
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The diagnostic value of this score may increase when nausea/ vomiting factor is added.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Renal colic pain is one of the most common agonizing forms of pain that is frequently treated in emergency departments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: We found that ureteral stone history, pain duration less than 6 hours, presence of hematuria and nausea/vomiting, C-reactive protein (CRP) value below 0.5 mg/dL, The MSS above 9, age ≤50 years were factors that increase stone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The diagnostic value of this score may increase when nausea/ vomiting factor is added.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Renal colic pain is one of the most common agonizing forms of pain that is frequently treated in emergency departments. Computed tomography (CT), which is used for the detection of kidney stones, is a costly application. Therefore, scoring systems that predict stone have been developed. This study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Modified STONE Score (MSS) to predict stones. Materials and Methods: Among those who applied to the emergency department with renal colic pain, patients with CT were examined. Three hundred and thirty-seven patients included in the study were divided into two groups as those with and without kidney stones. It was examined whether there was a difference between these two groups in terms of personal, seasonal, laboratory findings and MSS. Results: We found that ureteral stone history, pain duration less than 6 hours, presence of hematuria and nausea/vomiting, C-reactive protein (CRP) value below 0.5 mg/dL, The MSS above 9, age ≤50 years were factors that increase stone. The MSS was significantly high in the stone-detected group. When the STONE score is calculated for all patients and divided into three groups (low, moderated, and high modified STONE scores), the prevalence of ureteral stones increases towards the high MSS group. Conclusion: We found that the modified STONE score was quite successful in predicting ureteral stones. We determined that emergency physicians can diagnose stones using this score and avoid unnecessary CT. The diagnostic value of this score may increase when nausea/ vomiting factor is added.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYVAT, P., GÜLLÜPINAR, B., ÜNLÜER, E. E., KORAN, S. (2022). Evaluation of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with the Suspect of Acute Renal Colic with the Modified STONE Score. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 138–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/507894

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bultitude M, Rees J. Management of renal colic. BMJ. 2012;345:e5499
  2. Golzari SE, Soleimanpour H, Rahmani F, Zamani Mehr N, Safari S, Heshmat Y, et al. Therapeutic approaches for renal colic in the emergency department: a review article. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2014;4:e16222
  3. Agenosov MP, Kagan OF, Kheyfets VK. Features of urolithiasis in patients of advanced and senile age. Adv Gerontol. 2018;31:368-73
  4. D’Costa MR, Pais VM, Rule AD. Leave no stone unturned: defining recurrence in kidney stone formers. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2019;28:148-53
  5. Raja AS, Pourjabbar S, Ip IK, Baugh CW, Sodickson AD, O’Leary M, et al. Impact of a Health Information Technology-Enabled Appropriate Use Criterion on Utilization of Emergency Department CT for Renal Colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212:142-5
  6. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 2010; 12: pp. e86-96
  7. Watkins S, Bowra J, Sharma P, Holdgate A, Giles A, Campbell L. Validation of emergency physician ultrasound in diagnosing hydronephrosis in ureteric colic. Emerg Med Australas. 2007;19:188-95
  8. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475-82
  9. Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13:654-62
  10. National Research Council Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006
  11. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168:1-64
  12. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499-505
  13. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360
  14. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2071-7
  15. Moore CL, Bomann S, Daniels B, Luty S, Molinaro A, Singh D, et al. Derivation and validatio