Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of the Degree of Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Medicine Residents in Interpreting Computed Tomography of the Abdomen

Pages
114–119
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The high rate of agreement may be associated with the fact that emergency medicine residents are usually the first physicians who meet and treat patients with trauma and thus have gained sufficient experience in this field

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of emergency medicine residents in the interpretation of radiological investigation of patients with trauma, who received abdominal computed tomography in the emergency department.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated the reports of 200 patients who presented to the emergency medicine department of a university hospital with trauma, and who received abdominal computed tomography (CT) due to suspected abdominal pathology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The high rate of agreement may be associated with the fact that emergency medicine residents are usually the first physicians who meet and treat patients with trauma and thus have gained sufficient experience in this field
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of emergency medicine residents in the interpretation of radiological investigation of patients with trauma, who received abdominal computed tomography in the emergency department. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated the reports of 200 patients who presented to the emergency medicine department of a university hospital with trauma, and who received abdominal computed tomography (CT) due to suspected abdominal pathology. Results: In this study, 33% (66/200) of the patients were female and 67% (134/200) were male. CT scans of these 200 patients were examined by emergency medicine residents and radiology specialists. The results of the study showed that emergency medicine residents performed well in interpreting abdominal CT scans of patients with trauma with an agreement rate of 90.5%. Evaluation of the results obtained in our study suggested that emergency medicine residents generally performed well in interpreting abdominal CT scans of patients with trauma with suspected abdominal pathology in the emergency room. Conclusion: The high rate of agreement may be associated with the fact that emergency medicine residents are usually the first physicians who meet and treat patients with trauma and thus have gained sufficient experience in this field

🔖

Cite This Article

SIĞIRLI, D., DURAK, V. A., AYDIN, Ş. A., CANDER, S. T. S., ÇETİN, M. (2022). Analysis of the Degree of Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Medicine Residents in Interpreting Computed Tomography of the Abdomen. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 114–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/507886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. White S, Mendicuti DA, Sodickson A, Viscomi S, Stella M, Ledbetter MS. Nontraumatic Emergency Radiology of the Thorax. Emergency Radiology: The Requisites. Ed: Jorge AS. Mosby, Inc an affiliate of Elsevier; 2009.p.234- 74
  2. World Health Organization. Global burden of disease. Available from: www. who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/ (Cited 2010 May 1
  3. Boullion B, Lefering R, Vorveg M, Tiling T, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Travma score systems: Colognevalidationstudy. J Travma. 1997;42:652-8
  4. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. Engl J Med. 2006;354:366-78
  5. Pekdemir M, Cete Y, Eray O, Atilla R, Cevik AA, Topuzoglu A. Epidemiological characteristics of trauma patients. Ulus Travma Derg. 2000;6:250-4
  6. Durdu T, Kavalci C, Yilmaz F, Yilmaz MS, Karakilic ME, Arslan ED, et al. Analysis of trauma cases admitted to the emergency department. J Clin Analytic Med. 2014;5:182-5
  7. Bingol O, Ayrık C, Kose A, Bozkurt S, Narcı H, Ovla D, et al. Retrospective analysis of whole-body multislice computed tomography findings taken in trauma patients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2015;15:116-21
  8. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL, Bain LW, et al. The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma. 1990;30:1356-65
  9. Gönültaş F, Kutlutürk K, Gök A, Barut B, Şahin T, Yılmaz S. Analysis of risk factors of mortality in abdominal trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2020;26:43-9
  10. Makay Ö, Fırat Ö, Gürcü B, Sezer T, İçöz G. Abdominal travmada değişim süreci: Ege Üniversitesi deneyimi. Turk J Surg. 2005:21:4:196-200
  11. Bagheri-Hariri S, Ayoobi-Yazdi N, Afkar M, Farahmand S, Arbab M, Shahlafar N, et al. Abdominal and pelvic CT scan interpretation of emergency medicine physicians compared with radiologists’ report and its impact on patients’ outcome. Emerg Radiol. 2017;24:675-80
  12. Guven R, Akca AH, Caltili C, Sasmaz MI, Kaykisiz EK, Baran S, et al. Comparing the interpretation of emergency department computed tomography between emergency physicians and attending radiologists: A multicenter study. Nigerian J Clin Pract. 2018;21:1323-9
  13. Mucci B, Brett C, Huntly LS, Greene MK. Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:538-40
  14. Kang MJ, Sim MS, Shin TG, Jo IJ, Song HG, Song KJ, et al. Evaluating the accu