Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2004 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15

Identity Status of University Students with Different Levels of Social Support

Sosyal Destek Düzeyleri Farklı Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kimlik Statüleri

Pages
110–121
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that students’ identity status was affected by perceived social support from family/friends.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out to determine the differences in the university students’ identity status according to their perceived social support from family/friends.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants were 1653 university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that students’ identity status was affected by perceived social support from family/friends.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the differences in the university students’ identity status according to their perceived social support from family/friends. Participants were 1653 university students. Students’ identity development was measured by using Extended Ego Identity Status Scale which was based on Marcia’s identity status paradigm. Students’ social support was measured by Perceived Social Support from family/friends, which was developed by Procidano and Heller. Data were analyzed by Variance Analyses. Results showed that students’ identity status was affected by perceived social support from family/friends. Those with identity achievement students and those with foreclosure students had perceived high family support. In addition, those with identity achievement students also perceived high degree of social support from friends.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin ailelerinden ve arkadaşlarından algıladıkları sosyal destek düzeylerine göre kimlik statüleri incelenmiştir. Örneklem 1653 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada öğrencilerin kimlik gelişimi Marcia’nın kimlik statüleri paradigmasına dayalı olarak geliştirilen Genişletilmiş Ego Kimlik Statüleri Ölçeği ile, sosyal destek ise Procidano ve Heller’in geliştirdiği Aile ve Arkadaşlardan Algılanan Sosyal Destek ölçeğiyle ölçülmüştür. Verilerin analizi varyans analiziyle yapılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre, öğrencilerin kimlik statülerinin aileden ve arkadaşlardan algıladıkları sosyal destekten etkilendiği görülmüştür. Başarılı kimlik ve bağımlı kimlik statüsündeki öğrenciler, ailelerini yüksek düzeyde destekleyici olarak algılamışlardır. Ayrıca, başarılı kimlik statüsündeki öğrenciler tarafından arkadaşlar da yüksek düzeyde destekleyici olarak algılanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZMAN, E. (2022). Identity Status of University Students with Different Levels of Social Support. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15, 110–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/507851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adams, Gerald R. (1985). Family Correlates of Female Adolescents’ Ego Identity Development. Journal of Adolescence, 8, 69-82.
  2. Champbell, E., G. R. Adams ve W. R. Dobson. (1984). Familial Correlates of Identity Formation in Late Adolescence: A Study of Predictive Utility of Connectedness and Individuality in Family Relations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 509-525.
  3. Çuhadaroğlu, Füsun. (1989). Üniversite Gençlerinde Kimlik Bocalamaları. Üniversite Gençliğinde Uyum Sempozyumu Bilimsel Çalışmaları. 22-24
  4. Kasım. Erikson, Erik H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, NewYork. Eskin, Mehmet. (1993). Reliability of Turkish Version of the Perceived Social Support from Friends and Family Scales, Scale for Interpersonal Behavior, and Suicide Probability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, (4), 515-522.
  5. Keny M. E. ve K. G. Rice. (1995). Attachment to Parents and Adjustment in Late Adolescent Collage Students: Current Status, Applications, and Future Consideration. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 433-456.
  6. Marcia, James. (1966). Development and Validation of Ego Identity Status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.
  7. Marcia, James. (1989). Identity and Intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 401-410.
  8. Marcia, James. (2002).
  9. Adolescence, Identity and the Bernardone Family Identity: An International. Journal of Theory and Research, 2, (3), 109-299.
  10. Markstrom, C.A. ve Diğerleri. (1997). The Psychosocial Inventory of Ego Strengths: Development and Validation of a New Eriksonian Measure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, (6), 705-733.
  11. Matos, P. M. ve Diğerleri. (1999) Parental Attachment and Identity in Portuquese Late Adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 805-818.
  12. Muuss, Rolf. E. H. (1988). Theories of Adolescence,. Fifth Ed., America: McGraw Hill Inc. Muuss, Rolf E. H. (1998). Adolescence Behavior and Society: A Book of Readings. Fifth Ed. Amerika: McGraw Hill Company. Noller, P. ve V. Callan. (1991). The Adolescent in the Family Life Experiences. NewYork: Routledge Inc. O’conner, Brain P. (1995). Identity Development and Perceived Parental Behavior as Sources of Adolescent Egocentrism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, (2), 205-225.
  13. Oskay, Gülter. (1998). Genişletilmiş Objektif Ego Kimlik Statüsü Ölçeğinin (Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status-EOMEIS)’ in Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2, (9), 17-24.
  14. Pals, L. Jennifer. (1999). Identity C