SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2004 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15

Discover Assessment and Curriculum Model: The Aplication of Theories of Multiple Intelligences and Successful Intelligence in the Education of Gifted Students

Uğur SAK
C. June MAKER
Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The DISCOVER Curriculum is based on a constructivist philosophy, and involves using the learning principles outlined in the theory of Successful Intelligence and Multiple Intelligences for gifted students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article we report research related to DISCOVER Assessment and Curriculum Model used in education of gifted students, and discuss implications, referring to theories, models and conceptions of giftedness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:DISCOVER Assessment is a performance-based measure of mental abilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The DISCOVER Curriculum is based on a constructivist philosophy, and involves using the learning principles outlined in the theory of Successful Intelligence and Multiple Intelligences for gifted students.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article we report research related to DISCOVER Assessment and Curriculum Model used in education of gifted students, and discuss implications, referring to theories, models and conceptions of giftedness. DISCOVER Assessment is a performance-based measure of mental abilities. Two current theories of intelligence, Sternberg’s theory of Successful Intelligence and Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences, provided framework for the assessment. Research carried out over fifteen years provided evidence for reliability, and content, criterion and construct related validities. The DISCOVER Curriculum is based on a constructivist philosophy, and involves using the learning principles outlined in the theory of Successful Intelligence and Multiple Intelligences for gifted students.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAK, U., MAKER, C. J. (2022). Discover Assessment and Curriculum Model: The Aplication of Theories of Multiple Intelligences and Successful Intelligence in the Education of Gifted Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/507827

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Almegta, N. (1997). Correlation of standardized math achievement, DISCOVER math worksheet, ability, and gender of American Indian students. Unpublished manuscript. The University of Arizona, Tucson. Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1996). Talent beyond words: Identification of potential talent in dance and music in elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 93-101.
  2. Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1997). Transferring individual self-regulation processes from arts to academics. Arts Education Policy Review, 98, 32-39.
  3. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (1995). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children. Caterall, J. S. (1995). Different ways of knowing 1991-1994 National Longitudinal study report. Schools, communities, and the arts: A research compendium. Morrison Institute for public policy, Arizona State University, Tempe. Ceci, S.J. (1990). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 33-81.
  5. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
  6. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988).
  7. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. College Examination Board. (1993). Profile of SAT and achievement tests taken, 1987-93.
  8. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1992). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. Gifford & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. (pp. 77-120).
  9. Boston, MA: Kluver. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books. Getzels, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal,3(9), 80-84.
  10. Getzels, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley & Sons. Griffiths, S. E. (1997). The comparative validity of assessments based on different theories for the purpose of identifying gifted ethnic minority students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Arizona, Tucson. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than