Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Can Acute Care Biomarkers Change Patient’s Management in Sepsis?

Pages
79–85
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, coupling BioADM with other biomarkers already routinely used such as procalcitonin and lactate we can immediately change patient’s management in Sepsis improving our decision making and patient outcome

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sepsis and septic shock have an enormous burden on healthcare systems, having more than 30 million people worldwide suffering from those diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As emergency providers we must be able to immediately recognize the presence of sepsis to improve the management of this disease and reduce its burden on patient’s lives and on the emergency departments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, coupling BioADM with other biomarkers already routinely used such as procalcitonin and lactate we can immediately change patient’s management in Sepsis improving our decision making and patient outcome
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock have an enormous burden on healthcare systems, having more than 30 million people worldwide suffering from those diseases. As emergency providers we must be able to immediately recognize the presence of sepsis to improve the management of this disease and reduce its burden on patient’s lives and on the emergency departments. Biomarkers can play an important role in this attempt. Laboratory tests could help both to identify the presence of sepsis at patients’ arrival and to stratify the risk of progression to septic shock. A new biomarker in that regard is represented by Bioactive Adrenomedullin (BioADM), which mirrors vascular integrity, and is able to detect the physio pathological deterioration of the patients with sepsis that will progress into septic shock. Now, thanks to point-of-care testing devices, we are able to measure BioADM in whole blood in less than twenty minutes, which will help the physician making faster and more adequate therapeutical decisions beside patient’s bed. The good news is that BioADM will also serve as a target for a monoclonal antibody that will counteract the vascular disfunction in septic shock. In conclusion, coupling BioADM with other biomarkers already routinely used such as procalcitonin and lactate we can immediately change patient’s management in Sepsis improving our decision making and patient outcome

🔖

Cite This Article

SOMMA, S. D., CRISANTI, L. (2022). Can Acute Care Biomarkers Change Patient’s Management in Sepsis?. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 79–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/507812

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200-11
  2. Savarese G, Lund LH. Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3:7-11
  3. Medam S, Zieleskiewicz L, Duclos G, Baumstarck K, Loundou A, Alingrin J, et al. Risk factors for death in septic shock: A retrospective cohort study comparing trauma and non-trauma patients. Medicine. 2017;96:e9241
  4. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589-96
  5. Kempker JA, Wang HE, Martin GS. Sepsis is a preventable public health problem. Crit Care. 2018;22:116
  6. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1181-247
  7. Di Somma S, Paladino L, Vaughan L, Lalle I, Magrini L, Magnanti M. Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10:171-5
  8. Valli G, Galati E, De Marco F, Bucci C, Fratini P, Cennamo E, Ancona C, Volpe N, Ruggieri MP. In-hospital mortality in the emergency department: clinical and etiological differences between early and late deaths among patients awaiting admission. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021;8:325-32
  9. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304-77
  10. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-10
  11. Mearelli F, Barbati G, Spagnol F, Nunnari A, Castello LM, Lupia E, et al. The role of mid-regional proadrenomedullin in the differential diagnosis between culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis at emergency department admission. Biomedicines. 2022;10:357
  12. Wacker C, Prkno A, Brunkhorst FM, Schlattmann P. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:426-35
  13. Harbarth S, Holeckova K, Froidevaux C, Grau GE, Vadas L, Pugin J, et al. Diagnostic value