Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2005 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 21

Eğitim Fakültesinde Çalışan Akademik ve İdari Personelinin İş Doyumu: Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği

A Survey of Academic and Administrative Staff's Job Satisfaction: The Case of Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education

Pages
126–137
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The major findings are that there is no difference between academic and administrative staff on their measured level of job satisfaction according to the job satisfaction factors and that both groups show a “moderate” level of satisfaction in their respective jobs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the level of job satisfaction of academic and administrative staff in a faculty of education on eight factors: 1) physical conditions of the work environment, 2) personal relationships between the employees, 3) job characteristics, 4) organizational environment, 5) job evaluations, 6) tenure, 7) wage and 8) benefits.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of the study supports the earlier findings reported in the literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The major findings are that there is no difference between academic and administrative staff on their measured level of job satisfaction according to the job satisfaction factors and that both groups show a “moderate” level of satisfaction in their respective jobs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the level of job satisfaction of academic and administrative staff in a faculty of education on eight factors: 1) physical conditions of the work environment, 2) personal relationships between the employees, 3) job characteristics, 4) organizational environment, 5) job evaluations, 6) tenure, 7) wage and 8) benefits. The results of the study supports the earlier findings reported in the literature. The major findings are that there is no difference between academic and administrative staff on their measured level of job satisfaction according to the job satisfaction factors and that both groups show a “moderate” level of satisfaction in their respective jobs.

Özet

Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi akademik ve idari çalışanlarının fiziksel koşullardan, insan ilişkilerinden, işin niteliğinden, örgütsel ortamdan, denetlemeden, iş güvenliğinden, ücretten, özlük haklarından aldığı iş doyumu nasıldır? Araştırmanın bulguları bu konuda yapılmış diğer araştırmaları destekler durumdadır. Akademik ve idari personelin iş doyumu faktörlerine göre iş doyum düzeyleri arasında fark olmayıp, iş doyum düzeyleri “orta”dır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, A. R. (2022). Eğitim Fakültesinde Çalışan Akademik ve İdari Personelinin İş Doyumu: Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 21, 126–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/507786

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Balcı, A. (1985). Eğitim yöneticisinin iş doyumu [The educational administrator’s job satisfaction]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  2. Ankara,
  3. Turkey. Baysal, A. C. (1981). Sosyal ve Örgütsel Psikolojide Tutumlar [Attitudes in Social and Organizational Psychology]. Istanbul Günbayı, İ. (2001). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin iş doyumu [Elementary and middle school teachers’ job satisfaction]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 1 (2), 357 – 379. Güney, S., Varoğlu, A., & Aktaş, A. M. (1996). Özel ve Kamu Bankalarında İş Tatminine Yönelik Bir Araştırma [Examining job satisfaction in public and private banks]. Verimlilik Dergisi, 15 (1) 5–10
  4. King, M. & Murray, M. A. & Atkinson, T. (1982). Background personality job characteristics and satisfaction with working national Human Relations, 35 (2) 178-195
  5. Korman, A. (1978). Endüstriyel ve Organizasyonel Psikoloji [Industrial and Organizational Psychology] (İ. Akhun & C. Alkan, Trans.). Ankara:
  6. Milli Eğitim Basımevi. Özdayı, N. (1991). Resmi ve özel liselerde çalışan öğretmenlerin iş tatmini durumlarının karşılaştırılması [A comparison of job satisfaction of teachers working in public and private high schools]. In İ. Fındıkçı (Ed.), Eğitimde Nitelik Geliştirme (Eğitimde Arayışlar I. Sempozyumu Bildiri Metinleri) (pp.62–67). Istanbul: Kültür Koleji Yayınları.
  7. Sarpkaya, R. (2001). Liselerde çalışan öğretmenlerin iş doyumları [Job satisfaction of teachers working in high schools]. Retrieved January 12, 2003, from http://www.geocities.com/egitimcilersitesi_egitimbilim/ba-ogret_isdoyumu. htm Sencer, M. (1982). Kamu görevlilerinde iş doyumu ve moral: Güdülenme kuramlarına eleştirisel bir bakış [Job satisfaction and motivation in public servants: A critical look at the theories of conditioning]. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 15 (1),3–49.
  8. Tahta, F. (1995). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında çalışan öğretmenlerin iş doyumu düzeylerinin incelenmesi [A study of job satisfaction of teachers working in pre-school institutions]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  9. Ankara, Turkey.