Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 79

Assessment with and for Migration Background Students-Cases from Europe

Pages
39–68
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the survey results also indicate the need for training and professionaldevelopment, and this study also implies that not enough emphasis is being placed onculturally responsive assessment despite the rhetoric that espouses interculturalism.Implications for Research and Practice: The research points the need for upskilling inculturally responsive leadership as well as the development of an overarching culturallyresponsive assessment framework and toolkit that can be used by policy makers and schoolsto allay the various interpretations of what it means to satisfy the assessment needs of teachersand students with migrant backgrounds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this research as part of anErasmus+ funded project tilted Aiding CulturallyResponsive Assessment in Schools (www.acras.eu) is to provide an exploratory analysis of survey responses related to culturally responsive assessment policies, professional development and practices that were administered to school principals in four European countries (Austria, Ireland, Norway and Turkey).Research Methods: The research method used in thisstudy was a quantitative comparative analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Apurposeful sampling strategy was adopted based ongeographical spread of the participants in Austria,Ireland and Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the survey results also indicate the need for training and professionaldevelopment, and this study also implies that not enough emphasis is being placed onculturally responsive assessment despite the rhetoric that espouses interculturalism.Implications for Research and Practice: The research points the need for upskilling inculturally responsive leadership as well as the development of an overarching culturallyresponsive assessment framework and toolkit that can be used by policy makers and schoolsto allay the various interpretations of what it means to satisfy the assessment needs of teachersand students with migrant backgrounds.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research as part of anErasmus+ funded project tilted Aiding CulturallyResponsive Assessment in Schools (www.acras.eu) is to provide an exploratory analysis of survey responses related to culturally responsive assessment policies, professional development and practices that were administered to school principals in four European countries (Austria, Ireland, Norway and Turkey).Research Methods: The research method used in thisstudy was a quantitative comparative analysis. Apurposeful sampling strategy was adopted based ongeographical spread of the participants in Austria,Ireland and Turkey. The survey was alsoadministered to all principals in four out of eighteenNorwegian counties. Descriptive analysis andnonparametric analysis were used.Findings: There is evidence to suggest that the foundations for culturally responsiveassessment practices are beginning to take shape albeit varying degrees of difference in eachcountry. However, the survey results also indicate the need for training and professionaldevelopment, and this study also implies that not enough emphasis is being placed onculturally responsive assessment despite the rhetoric that espouses interculturalism.Implications for Research and Practice: The research points the need for upskilling inculturally responsive leadership as well as the development of an overarching culturallyresponsive assessment framework and toolkit that can be used by policy makers and schoolsto allay the various interpretations of what it means to satisfy the assessment needs of teachersand students with migrant backgrounds.

🔖

Cite This Article

MCNAMARA, G., BROWN, M., BURNS, D., NORTVEDT, G., SKEDSMO, G., GLOPPEN, S. K., WIESE, E. F., OHARA, J., NAYIR, F. (2022). Assessment with and for Migration Background Students-Cases from Europe. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 79, 39–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/507751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aceves, T. C., & Orosco, M. J. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching (Document No. IC- 2). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/ on 10 May 2017
  2. AFAD (2016). Suriye afet raporu (Syria disaster report) (Retrieved from, https://www.afad.gov.tr/tr/2372/Afet-Raporu-Suriye, in 22.11.2016).
  3. Baker, E. L., O'Neil, H. F.Jr., & Linn, R. L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist American Psychological Association, 48 (12), 1210-1218
  4. Banks, J. A. (2006). Diversity in american education: Foundations, curriculum and teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Banks, J. A. (2008). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies. Boston Allyn & Bacon. Bennett, J. M. (2009). Cultivating intercultural competence: A process perspective. In Deardorff, D. K. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 121- 140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Bilgili O., Volante L., & Klinger, D. (2018). Immigrant student achievement and the performance disadvantage. In Volante L., Klinger D., Bilgili O. (Eds.), Immigrant student achievement and education policy- Policy implications of research in education (pp. 3-150).
  5. Springer, Cham. Bledsoe, K., & Donaldson, S. I. (2015). Culturally responsive theory driven evaluation. In S. Hood, R. Hopson & H. Frierson (Eds.), Continuing the journey to reposition culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice (pp. 3-28).
  6. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc. Borjas, G. J. (1995). The economic benefits from immigration. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(2), 3-22
  7. Brown, M., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2016). Quality and the rise of value-added in education: The case of Ireland. Policy Futures in Education, 14(6), 810-829
  8. Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., Hood, S., Burns, D., & Kurum, G. (2017) 'Evaluating the impact of distributed culturally responsive leadership in a disadvantaged rural primary school in Ireland'. Educational Management and Administration. Retrieved from https://doi- org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1177%2F1741143217739360 on 15 April 2018
  9. Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., & O’Brien, S. (2017) Inspectors and the Process of Self-Evaluation in Ireland. In: Baxter J. Eds) School Inspectors. Accountability and Educational Improvement. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52536-5_4
  10. Brown, M. (2013) Inquir