SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24

Analysis of Preservice Science Teachers' Attitudes Toward Mechanics' Concepts

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Mekanik Konularına Karşı Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Serkan YILMAZ
Pages
199–208
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that there was only a significant main gender effect (F(1,284)=10.05, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Attitude is one of the most famous factor that has been widely re- searched in education literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Pilot study was conducted in 2003 with 147 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that there was only a significant main gender effect (F(1,284)=10.05, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Attitude is one of the most famous factor that has been widely re- searched in education literature. Although there are many studies in the litera- ture about attitudes toward science, there is still a need of a research study that specifically investigates Turkish preservice science teachers’ attitudes toward mechanics. Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between students’ attitudes toward mechanics and some various variables. Methods: Pilot study was conducted in 2003 with 147 students. Mechanics’ Con- cepts Attitude Scale (MCAS) was used as the only measuring tool. It was adapted from Taşlıdere (2002). This Likert type attitude scale was composed of 24 positive items with 5 interval scale. Each item was coded from 1 to 5 in increasing positive response. The higher score indicates higher positive attitudes. The sample of the main study conducted in 2005 was 290 (67% female and 33% male). And this sample chosen from the accessible population was a sample of convenience. Cronbach alpha was found .93 in the pilot study and .94 in the main study. Lastly, semistructured short interviews (about 15 minutes) were made with 18 students (9 girls, 9 boys). Four questions were used for this aim. All recorded data were analyzed by calculating the frequencies of students’ answers to the questions. Results and Discussion: 3x2 ANOVA was used to analyze the main effects of gender and class level and their interaction effect. The results showed that there was only a significant main gender effect (F(1,284)=10.05, p

Özet

Problem Durumu: Tutum, eğitim alanyazınındaki en meşhur ve en çok araştırılan faktörlerden bir tanesidir. Fene karşı tutumla ilgili birçok çalışma olmasına rağmen özellikle fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının mekanik konularına karşı tutumlarını inceleyen çalışmalara halen ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır. Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının mekanik konularına karşı tutumlarını, başta cinsiyet değişkeni ağırlıklı olmak üzere, çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelemektir. Yöntem: Pilot çalışma 2003 yılında 147 öğrenci ile yapılmıştır. Ölçme aracı olarak Taşlıdere’nin (2002) çalışmasından adapte edilen Mekanik Konuları Tutum Ölçeği (MKTÖ) kullanılmıştır. Ölçek, 5’li Likert tipi 24 olumlu maddeden oluşan bir tutum ölçeğidir. Öğrencilere her madde için olumsuzdan olumluya doğru 1 ile 5 arasında puan verilmiştir. MKTÖ puanı yüksek olan öğrencilerin mekanik konularına karşı tutumu olumlu, düşük olanların ise olumsuz demektir. Ana çalışma 2005 yılında yapılmıştır. 290 (%67 kız, %33 erkek) fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Pilot çalışma için alfa güvenirlik katsayısı .93, ana çalışma için .94 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca 18 öğrenciyle (9 kız, 9 erkek) yarı yapılandırılmış kısa mülakatlar (yaklaşık 15 dakika) yapılmıştır. Tamamı teybe kaydedilmiştir. Bu amaçla 4 soru hazırlanmıştır. Öğrencilerin sorulara verdikleri cevaplara göre frekans değerleri üzerinden veri analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular ve Tartışma: Sınıf düzeyi ve cinsiyet değişkenlerinin ana etkilerini ve ortak etkisini inceleyebilmek için 3x2 ANOVA yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar, sadece cinsiyetin ana etkisinin anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir (F(1,284)=10.05, p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, S. (2022). Analysis of Preservice Science Teachers' Attitudes Toward Mechanics' Concepts. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24, 199–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/507701

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baker, D. R. (1983). The relationship of attitude, cognitive abilities, and personality to science achievement in the junior high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX. Barrington, B.L., & Hendricks, B. (1988). Attitude toward science and science knowledge of intellectually gifted and average students in 3rd, 7th, and 11th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 679-687.
  2. Butzow, J.W. (1973). Why the new school science doesn’t sell. Science Children, 10(5), 21. Crawley, F.E., & Koballa, T. (1994). Attitude research in science education: Contemporary models and meth- ods. Science Education, 78(1), 35-55.
  3. Demirci, N. (2004). Students’ attitudes toward introductory physics course. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fa- kültesi Dergisi, 26, 33-40.
  4. Fraser, B.J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62, 509-515.
  5. Gardner, P.L. (1995). Measure attitudes to science: Unidimensionality and internal consistence revisited. Re- search in Science Education, 25, 283-289.
  6. George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parents and teacher influences on science attitudes of eight graders. Science Education, 82, 93-109.
  7. George, R. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of tal- ent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 213-225.
  8. Jones, C., & Levin, J. (1994). Primary/elementary teachers’ attitudes towards science in four areas related to gender differences in students’ science performance. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6(1), 46- 66. Jones, M.G., Howe, A., & Rua, M.J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests and atti- tudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192.
  9. Kotte, D. (1992). Gender differences in science achievement in 10 countries. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Kyle, W.C., Bonstetter, R.J., & Gadsden, T. (1988). An implementation study: An analysis of elementary stu- dents’ and teachers’ attitudes toward science in process approach vs. traditional science classes. Jour- nal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 103-120.
  10. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2001). Gender difference in attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 324-340.
  11. McDevitt, T.M., Heikkinen, H.W., Alcorn, J.K., Ambrosio, A.L., & Gardner, A.L. (1993). Evaluation of the pr