Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 42

Developing Children’s Environmental Literacy Through Literature: An Analysis of 100 Basic Literary Works

Developing Children's Environmental Literacy Through Literature: An Analysis of 100 Basic Literary Works

Pages
46–63
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is suggested to other researchers to conduct broader research with more classic works, including both national and international classics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem Statement: Development of environmental literacy, the ultimate goal of environmental education, should not be bound only to the natural sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even though MoNE suggested 100 classics for elementary and secondary education students to develop reading habits and to introduce the national and international classic works, number of studies focussing on the implications of these classics on the educational process (policy and practice) and individual development of the students is limited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is suggested to other researchers to conduct broader research with more classic works, including both national and international classics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem Statement: Development of environmental literacy, the ultimate goal of environmental education, should not be bound only to the natural sciences. It can also be developed though art and literature when considering the interdisciplinary nature of environmental education. Literary children's books, for example, can be an effective tool to develop students' environmental literacy. Even though MoNE suggested 100 classics for elementary and secondary education students to develop reading habits and to introduce the national and international classic works, number of studies focussing on the implications of these classics on the educational process (policy and practice) and individual development of the students is limited. In this regard, the present study is one of the initial attempts to reveal the hidden and/or explicit effects of these classics on students' environmental literacy. Purpose of Study: The purpose of the study was to analyze the components of environmental literacy embedded in the classic works recommended by MoNE for Turkish elementary schools. Methods: For detailed examination, the researchers randomly selected 10 classics from 63 well-known Turkish classic works for content analysis considering the framework of environmental literacy proposed by Simmons. Content analysis enables the researchers to examine what is or what is not in the selected written or Visual document(s). The results reported the frequency and percentage of environmental literacy components embedded in the selected works. Findings and Results: The content analysis of these works revealed three types of main components (knowledge, affect and behavior) andseveral sub—components. Students’ awareness of the natural environment and geographical pattern (morning-night and seasons-climate) was mostly emphasized in nearly all of the analyzed works. Students’ affect and physical behaviors were relatively less emphasized. Conclusions and Recommendations: In the analyzed classics, environmental pollution, which is one of the main topics and emphases of Environmental Education (EE) was paid very little attention. Considering its interdisciplinary nature, EE should be infused in other subjects (i.e., art and literature) and various classroom activities taking place in humanity classes. In this regard, 100 classics suggested for the elementary and secondary school students can be used as vehicle. This study was only realized with 10 selected classics out of 63 Turkish classics. Foreign classics were not included in the study. It is suggested to other researchers to conduct broader research with more classic works, including both national and international classics.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, E., UŞAK, M., ERDOĞAN, M. (2022). Developing Children’s Environmental Literacy Through Literature: An Analysis of 100 Basic Literary Works. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 42, 46–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/507466

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. slan, C. (2006). Türk çocuk yazımnda çocuk-yetişkin çatışmasının yer aldığı kimi yapıtların incelenmesi [An analysis of various pieces on children literature in Turkish on the issue of children—adult conflicts], Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39 (2), 193-216.
  2. Aslan, C. (2010). An analysis of the Presentation of women in 100 basic literary works in Turkey. Eğitim Araştırmaları—Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 19-36.
  3. Babulski, K., Gannett, C., Myers, K., Peppel, K. Williams, R. (1999). white paper on the relationship between school reform and environmental education in Florida: Correlating Florida's Sunshine State Standards and an Environmental Literacy Framework. Melbourne, FL: Research paper, Science Education Department, Florida Institute of Technology. Bonnett, M., Williams, ]. (1998). Environmental education and primary children’s attitude towards nature and environment. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28 (2), 159—177. Coşkun, E. (2005). Qualitative research on evaluations of teachers and students of 4th and 5th class about new Turkish language education curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory Practice. (2), 421 —476. Dilidüzgi'ın, S. (2004). Çağdaş çocuk yazım. [Contemporary children literature], lstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yay. Disinger, ]. F., Roth, C.E. (1992).
  4. Environmental literacy. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC SMEAC Information Reference Center. ED 351201. Dökmen, Ü. (1994). Okuma becerisi, ilgisi ve alışkanlığı uzerine psiko-sosyal bir araştırma. [A Psycho-social investigation on about reading skill, concern and habit]. Ankara:
  5. MEB Yay. Epçaçan, C. Erze, M. (2008). İlköğretim Türkçe dersi öğretim programmın değerlendirilmesi. [The evaluation of elementary Turkish language curriculum]. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, I, (4). Erdoğan, M. (2009). Fifth grade students’ environmental literacy and the factors ajecting students’ environmentally responsible behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey. Erdoğan, M., Uşak, M. (2009) Curricular and extra-curricular activities to develop the environmental awareness of young students: case from Turkey. Odgojne Znanosti-Educational Sciences, 11(1), 73-85.
  6. Erdoğan, M., Z. Kostova, T. Marcinkowski. (2009). Components of environmental literacy in elementary science education curriculum in Bulgaria and Turkey. Eurasia ]ournal of Mathematics, Science Technology Education, (1), 15—26. Erdoğan, M., Marcinkowski, T. Ok, (2009). Content anal