SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 46

Turkish Adaptation of the Gratitude Questionnaire

Asuman YÜKSEL
Nagihan OĞUZ DURAN
Pages
199–212
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions and Recommendations: The results of this study revealed that the five-item GQ can be used to evaluate prepositional gratitude among Turkish college students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem Statement: Although the study of gratitude in psychology has a very short history, the findings of several studies underline the role of gratitude in enhancing individual well-being.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, a five-item model, rather than the original sixitem version, fit the sample of Turkish college students better [GFI=0.97, CFI= .94, AGFI=0.90, SRMR = 0.04, RMSEA=0.10].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions and Recommendations: The results of this study revealed that the five-item GQ can be used to evaluate prepositional gratitude among Turkish college students.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem Statement: Although the study of gratitude in psychology has a very short history, the findings of several studies underline the role of gratitude in enhancing individual well-being. Therefore, it is important to be able to assess levels of individual gratitude in counseling and research settings. Since, in the Turkish literature, no measure of gratitude has been validated for college students, it is important to adapt The Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ), one of the most commonly used self-report measures of dispositional gratitude in recent literature, into Turkish, for use in research and practice. assessed by calculating the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Additionally, internal consistency was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha, and item-total correlation and test-retest reliability coefficients were calculated by Pearson correlation. Findings and Results: Regarding construct validity, the scale was unidimensional. However, a five-item model, rather than the original sixitem version, fit the sample of Turkish college students better [GFI=0.97, CFI= .94, AGFI=0.90, SRMR = 0.04, RMSEA=0.10]. The findings also indicated sufficient evidence in favor of the concurrent validity and reliability of the Turkish GQ. Conclusions and Recommendations: The results of this study revealed that the five-item GQ can be used to evaluate prepositional gratitude among Turkish college students.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, A., DURAN, N. O. (2022). Turkish Adaptation of the Gratitude Questionnaire. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 46, 199–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/507459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aydın, G., & Tezer, E. (1991). İyimserlik, sağlık sorunları ve akademik başarı ilişkisi. [The relationship between optimism, physical symptoms, and academic achievement] Turkish Journal of Psychology, 7, (26), 2-9.
  2. Becker, J. A., & Smenner, P. C. (1986). The spontaneous use of thank you by preschoolers as a function of sex, socioeconomic status, and listener status. Language in Society, 15, 537-546.
  3. Ceyhan, A.A., Ceyhan, E., & Kurtyılmaz, Y. (2009). Investigation of university students' depression. Eğitim Araştırmaları, Eurasion Journal of Educational Research, 36, 75-90.
  4. Chen, L.H., Chen, M.Y., Kee, Y.H., & Tsai, Y.M. (2009). Validation of the gratitude questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese Undergraduate students. Journal of happiness Studies, 10, 665-664.
  5. Diener, E. Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
  6. Emmons, R. A., & Shelton, C. M. (2002). Gratitude and the science of positive psychology. In C. R. Synder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 459-471).
  7. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  8. Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377-389
  9. Emmons, R. A. (2004). Gratitude. In C. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (pp. 553-568).
  10. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  11. Emmons, R.A., McCullough, M.E., & Tsang, J. (2007). The Assessment of gratitude. In. S. J.Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive Psychological Assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington DC (pp.327-341).
  12. APA. Froh, J. J., Sefick, W. J., & Emmons, R. A. (2008). Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 213-233.
  13. Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Ozimkowski, K. M., & Miller, N. (2009). Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention in children and adolescents? Examining positive affect as a moderator. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 408-422.
  14. Froh, J. J., Bono, G., & Emmons, R. A. (2010). Being grateful is beyond good manners: Gratitude and motivation to contribute to society among early adolescents. Motivation & Emotion, 34, 144-157.
  15. Froh, J. J., Fan, J., Emmons, R. A., Bono, G., Huebner, E. S., & Watkins, P. (2011). Measuring Gratitude in Yout