Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 46

The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties among Turkish University Students

Pages
179–198
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The psychometric properties of the TEQ were analyzed through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem statement: Today, it is widely accepted that empathy is a multidimensional factor that facilitates human relations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose of Study: The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) is a selfreport style, uni-dimensional, 16-item, five-point Likert type scale developed to assess the empathy levels of individuals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The psychometric properties of the TEQ were analyzed through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem statement: Today, it is widely accepted that empathy is a multidimensional factor that facilitates human relations. The common idea that empathy comprises more than one component has created diversity in the assessment of the said factor; many researchers have developed empathy scales that include different dimensions. However, unidimensional assessments minimize differences between assessments and develop an accepted core assessment tool. Purpose of Study: The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) is a selfreport style, uni-dimensional, 16-item, five-point Likert type scale developed to assess the empathy levels of individuals. The objective of this study is to adapt the TEQ into Turkish and to analyze its psychometric properties in a sample of Turkish university students. Methods: Study participants included 698 university students from Ege and Sakarya University. In the research, the Emphatic Tendency Scale and the Basic Empathy Scale were used as data collection tools along with the TEQ. In the adaptation of the questionnaire, a linguistic equivalence study was performed first. The psychometric properties of the TEQ were analyzed through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor

🔖

Cite This Article

SAPMAZ, F., TOTAN, T., DOĞAN, T. (2022). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties among Turkish University Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 46, 179–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/507431

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aron, A. & Aron, E. N. (2002). Statistiscs for behavioral social sciences. A brief course.New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175.
  2. Bayam, G., Şimşek, E. U., & Dilbaz, N. (1995). Üç farklı meslek grubunda empatikbeceri düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparision emphatic ability levelbetween three differents profession groups]. Kriz Dergisi, 3(1-2), 205-207.
  3. Bora, E. & Baysan, L. (2009). Empati Ölçeği-Türkçe Formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde psikometrik özellikleri [Psychometric features of Turkish version of empathy quotient in university students]. Klinik PsikofarmakolojiBülteni, 19(1), 39-47.
  4. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. İstatistiki araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Statistical research design SPSS applications and interpretation]. Ankara:
  6. PegemA Yayıncılık. Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. London: Continuum International Pub. Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment Reseach & Evaluation, 10(7). Dadds, M. R. et al. (2008). A measure of cognitive and affective empathy in children using parent ratings. Child Psychiatry & Human Devolopment, 39, 111–122.
  7. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.
  8. Deniz, K. Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama [The adaptation of psychological scales]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16.
  9. Dökmen, Ü. (1987). Empati kurma becerisi ile sosyometrik statü arasındaki ilişki [The relation between empathy ability and sociometric statutes]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakülte Dergisi, 20(1-2), 183-207.
  10. Dökmen, Ü. (1988). Empatinin yeni bir modele dayanılarak ölçülmesi ve psikodrama ile geliştirilmesi [Empathy measures based on new methods and its development via psychodrama]. Ankara