Journals / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Biologic treatments in Behçet’s disease

Pages
217–222
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Still, randomized controlled trials of biologic agents, especially for the treatment of major organ involvement, are insufficient, and further prospective, long-term follow-up studies are needed to clarify the efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment duration of biologic agents in BD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Behçet’s disease (BD) significantly increases morbidity and mortality, especially in young men.
📊
Key Findings & Data:IL-1 inhibitors and tocilizumab may be alternatives for the treatment of patients with refractory eye involvement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Still, randomized controlled trials of biologic agents, especially for the treatment of major organ involvement, are insufficient, and further prospective, long-term follow-up studies are needed to clarify the efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment duration of biologic agents in BD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Behçet’s disease (BD) significantly increases morbidity and mortality, especially in young men. While vascular involvement is the most frequent cause of mortality, ocular involvement, which can cause visual loss, is the most important cause of morbidity in BD. Immunosuppressive treatment is the mainstay for major organ involvement. However, despite optimal immunosuppressive treatment, relapses and disease-related damage develop in a subgroup of patients, especially among those with ocular or vascular involvement. With the recent understanding of the immuno-pathogenesis, biologic treatments targeting potential pathogenic cells, cytokines or pathways are better optimized in BD. Data from large series showed that tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interferon-α are effective and safe treatment options for the treatment of refractory and major organ involvement, such as ocular, neurologic, vascular, and gastrointestinal. Anakinra and ustekinumab also seem to be promising agents for refractory mucocutaneous disease. IL-1 inhibitors and tocilizumab may be alternatives for the treatment of patients with refractory eye involvement. Still, randomized controlled trials of biologic agents, especially for the treatment of major organ involvement, are insufficient, and further prospective, long-term follow-up studies are needed to clarify the efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment duration of biologic agents in BD.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİRESKENELİ, H., ÖNER, F. A. (2022). Biologic treatments in Behçet’s disease. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 217–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/507403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kural-Seyahi E, Fresko I, Seyahi N, et al. The long-term mortality and morbidity of Behcet syndrome: A 2-decade outcome survey of 387 patients followed at a dedicated center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003
  2. [Crossref] 2. Saadoun D, Wechsler B, Desseaux K, et al. Mortality in Behçet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2010
  3. [Crossref] 3. İris M, Özçıkmak E, Aksoy A, et al. The assessment of contributing factors to oral ulcer presence in Behçet’s disease: Dietary and non-dietary factors. Eur J Rheumatol. 2018
  4. [Crossref] 4. Mumcu G, Direskeneli H. Triggering agents and microbiome as environmental factors on Behçet’s syndrome. Intern Emerg Med. 2019
  5. [Crossref] 5. Remmers EF, Cosan F, Kirino Y, et al. Genome- wide association study identifies variants in the MHC class I, IL10, and IL23R-IL12RB2 regions associated with Behçet’s disease. Nat Genet. 2010
  6. [Crossref] 6. Mizuki N, Meguro A, Ota M, et al. Genome-wide association studies identify IL23R-IL12RB2 and IL10 as Behçet’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2010
  7. [Crossref] 7. Kirino Y, Bertsias G, Ishigatsubo Y, et al. Genome- wide association analysis identifies new susceptibility loci for Behçet’s disease and epistasis between HLA-B*51 and ERAP1. Nat Genet. 2013
  8. [Crossref] 8. Kirino Y, Zhou Q, Ishigatsubo Y, Mizuki N, et al. Targeted resequencing implicates the familial Mediterranean fever gene MEFV and the tolllike receptor 4 gene TLR4 in Behçet disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013
  9. [Crossref] 9. Hughes T, Coit P, Adler A, et al. Identification of multiple independent susceptibility loci in the HLA region in Behçet’s disease. Nat Genet. 2013
  10. [Crossref] 10. Fei Y, Webb R, Cobb BL, et al. Identification of novel genetic susceptibility loci for Behçet’s disease using a genome-wide association study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009
  11. R66. [Crossref] 11. Sawalha AH, Hughes T, Nadig A, et al. A putative functional variant within the UBAC2 gene is associated with increased risk of Behçet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2011
  12. [Crossref] 12. Mumcu G, Inanc N, Yavuz S, et al. The role of infectious agents in the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment strategies in Behçet’s disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007
  13. S27-33. 13. Kurhan-Yavuz S, Direskeneli H, Bozkurt N, et al. Anti-MHC autoimmunity in Behçet’s disease: T cell responses to an HLA-B-derived peptide cross-reactive with retinal-S antigen in pati