SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 55

A factor Analysis on Teamwork Performance -an Empirical Study of Inter-instituted Collaboration

Ya-Hsueh CHEN
Mingchang WU
Pages
37–54
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Emotional intelligence did not have any significant direct effect on team performance but played a moderating role.Conclusions and Recommendations: This study concluded that vocational institutes are academic organizations where knowledge-sharing is a crucial mission and where strategies are put into place to fulfill that mission; team conflict should be avoided for better team performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem Statement: Inter-instituted collaboration has attracted broad attention for educational quality improvement in the last decade.The team performance of these innovative team projects received foremost attention, particularly with knowledge-sharing, emotional intelligence, and team conflicts.Purpose of Study: The purpose of the study was to empirically investigate the relationships among these three factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of this study was 178 professors, involving collaboration projects from twenty vocational institutes at the higher-education level.Methods: The collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows and LISREL 8.70 for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Emotional intelligence did not have any significant direct effect on team performance but played a moderating role.Conclusions and Recommendations: This study concluded that vocational institutes are academic organizations where knowledge-sharing is a crucial mission and where strategies are put into place to fulfill that mission; team conflict should be avoided for better team performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem Statement: Inter-instituted collaboration has attracted broad attention for educational quality improvement in the last decade.The team performance of these innovative team projects received foremost attention, particularly with knowledge-sharing, emotional intelligence, and team conflicts.Purpose of Study: The purpose of the study was to empirically investigate the relationships among these three factors. The sample of this study was 178 professors, involving collaboration projects from twenty vocational institutes at the higher-education level.Methods: The collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows and LISREL 8.70 for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Also, the study undertook the Maximum Likelihood Estimation to analyze the linear relationships among the three major variables.Results: The statistical analysis result indicated that knowledge-sharing created a positive effect on team performance. On the other hand, team conflict caused a negative effect on team performance. Emotional intelligence did not have any significant direct effect on team performance but played a moderating role.Conclusions and Recommendations: This study concluded that vocational institutes are academic organizations where knowledge-sharing is a crucial mission and where strategies are put into place to fulfill that mission; team conflict should be avoided for better team performance. This study finally proposed several suggestions for improved team performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHEN, Y., WU, M. (2022). A factor Analysis on Teamwork Performance -an Empirical Study of Inter-instituted Collaboration. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 55, 37–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/507318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Argote, L. & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 150- 169. Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
  2. Bartol, K. M. & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of leadership and Organization Studies, 9 (1), 64-76.
  3. Birx, E., Lasala, K. B., & Edd, W. M. (2011). Evaluation of a team building: Retreat to promote nursing faculty cohesion and job satisfaction. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27, 174-178.
  4. Bishop, J. & Scott, K. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 439-450.
  5. Black, C., Crest, S., & Volland, M. (2001). Building a successful information literacy infrastructure on the foundation of librarian-faculty collaboration. Research Strategies, 18, 215-225.
  6. Chen, G. & Tjosvold, D. (2002). Conflict management and team effectiveness in China: The mediating role of justice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 557- 572. Clercq, D. D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation- performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 87-103.
  7. Cummings, J. L. (2002). Knowledge transfer across R&D units: An empirical investigation of the factors affecting successful knowledge transfer across intra- and inter-organizational units, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Das, T.K. (2006). Strategic alliance temporalities and partner opportunism. British Journal of Management, 17, 1-21.
  8. Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1998). Emotional Intelligence: In Search of an Elusive Construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (4), 989-1015.
  9. DeDreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 741-749.
  10. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychology safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 119-143.
  11. Faraj, S. & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46 (12), 1554-1568.
  12. Fleming, G. L. & Thompson, T. L. (2004). The role of trust building and its relation to collect