Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 54

Preservice Teachers' Intercultural Competence: A Comparative Study of Teachers in Switzerland and Turkey

Pages
19–38
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Teacher training should align with international standards andtopics, and include a systematic approach to promote interculturalcompetence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem Statement: Every society consists of individuals different in termsof physical, psychological, and sociocultural characteristics.Differentiation in today’s societies has increased due to globalization,intensified immigration, advancements in communication technologies,and the recent increase in value of subcultures within the dominantculture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample comprised 185 preservice teachers, 84 ofwhom were from Switzerland and 101 of whom were from Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Teacher training should align with international standards andtopics, and include a systematic approach to promote interculturalcompetence.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem Statement: Every society consists of individuals different in termsof physical, psychological, and sociocultural characteristics.Differentiation in today’s societies has increased due to globalization,intensified immigration, advancements in communication technologies,and the recent increase in value of subcultures within the dominantculture. Consequently, human communities that maintain differentcharacteristics together have brought about the concept of multiculturalsocieties. Within these societies, teachers play the principle role inmaintaining the multicultural environment and managing its processes.Since teachers’ successful implementation of these tasks depends on theirlevel of intercultural competence, today’s teachers should develop theirintercultural competence.Purpose of Study: The present study aims to determine the interculturalcompetence levels of preservice teachers from Switzerland and Turkey.Methods: A descriptive survey model was used as the chief researchapproach. The study sample comprised 185 preservice teachers, 84 ofwhom were from Switzerland and 101 of whom were from Turkey. Datawere collected by means of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaireand a personal information form.Findings and Results: The intercultural competence levels of preserviceteachers from Switzerland and Turkey were found to be middling.Preservice teachers perceived themselves to be the most competent in thedimension of ‘cultural empathy,’ which was followed by ‘openmindedness,’‘social initiative,’ ‘flexibility,’ and ‘emotional stability,’respectively. The variable of preservice teachers’ university showedsignificant difference regarding the self-perception of interculturalcompetence. By culture, results revealed that preservice teachers fromSwitzerland had higher intercultural competence than those from Turkey,though such competence did not show significant differences according togender and department.Conclusions and Recommendations: The variable of nationality significantdiffered in preservice teachers’ perceptions of intercultural competence. InSwitzerland, whose preservice teachers’ perceptions of such competencewere higher, teacher training curricula include courses onmulticulturalism and intercultural education, while in Turkey suchcourses are not offered even as electives. Understanding multiculturalismnecessitates the renewal of preservice and in-service teacher trainingprograms. Teacher training should align with international standards andtopics, and include a systematic approach to promote interculturalcompetence.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARKA, T. O., POLAT, S. (2022). Preservice Teachers' Intercultural Competence: A Comparative Study of Teachers in Switzerland and Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 54, 19–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/507293

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aleem, S. (2005). Emotional stability among college youth. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 31(1, 2), 100-102.
  2. Altundağ, P. (2007). Kültürlerarası yeterlilik ve Korece öğretimi [Intercultural competence and Korean Language learners]. Unpublished master dissertation, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  3. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  4. Arends-Toth, J. & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249-266.
  5. Arslan, H. (2009). Educational policy vs. culturally sensitive programs in Turkish educational system. International Journal of Progressive Education, 5 (2), 44- 57. Arslanoğlu, İ. (2000). Kültür ve medeniyet kavramları [Concepts of culture and civilization]. Gazi Üniversitesi Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, 15, 243- 255. Banks, J. & Banks, C. (2007). Multicultural education, perspectives and issues. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley &Sons. Banks, J. A. (2009). Multicultural education: Dimensions and paradigms. In J. Banks (Ed.), Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 9- 32). New York: Routledge. Banks, J. A. (1999). An introduction to multicultural education (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &Bacon. Banting, K., Kymlicka, W., Johnston, R. & Soroka, S. (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in advanced democracies. In K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, (Eds.), Do MulticulturalismPolicies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis (pp. 49-91). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 27 2010 from http://www.snsoroka.com/files/2006Bantingetal(OUP).pdf
  6. Batelaan, P. & Hoof, C. V. (1996) Cooperative learning in intercultural education. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 7 (3), 5–17.
  7. Bennett, C.I. (2003). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Bhawuk, D. P. S. & Brislin, R. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16 (4), 413–436.
  8. Bisballe, L. (2006). The intercultural city - making the most of diversity (Thematic study). Social entrepreneurship as a space for intercultural communication and innovation. Retrieved February 3 2014 from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/cities/Publication/Soci alEntrepreneurship.pdf Byram, M. (2000). Assessing intercultural competence in language teaching. Sprogforum, 18