Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 62

Factors Associated with Absenteeism in High Schools

Pages
37–56
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The model was tested using LISREL 8.3with maximum likelihood estimation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem Statement: There are many factors that affect student achievementdirectly and indirectly at the secondary educational level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lowerattendance rates have been cited as detrimental to academic achievement;therefore, it is suggested that improved attendance is a direct indicator,rather than determinant of students’ academic achievement.Purpose of Study: The main purpose of this study was to investigate theeffect of individual, family and school variables on absenteeism amonghigh school students.Method: Data for this study was collected via a survey of 581 students fromthe 9th – 11th grades, selected with cluster sampling from secondaryschools in Burdur.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The model was tested using LISREL 8.3with maximum likelihood estimation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem Statement: There are many factors that affect student achievementdirectly and indirectly at the secondary educational level. Lowerattendance rates have been cited as detrimental to academic achievement;therefore, it is suggested that improved attendance is a direct indicator,rather than determinant of students’ academic achievement.Purpose of Study: The main purpose of this study was to investigate theeffect of individual, family and school variables on absenteeism amonghigh school students.Method: Data for this study was collected via a survey of 581 students fromthe 9th – 11th grades, selected with cluster sampling from secondaryschools in Burdur. Among the respondents, 44% were males and 56%females. The data collection instrument consisted of five sections includingpersonal information, causes of absenteeism, school commitment, qualityof school environment, and parental control. The Causes of AbsenteeismScale was developed by the researchers for secondary school students. Thescale consists of three dimensions: individual, family, and school-basedreasons. Parental Behavioral Control was assessed using a 20-itemmeasure recording the degree to which a parent monitors the adolescent’sbehavior or actions. The School Attachment Scale was used to measure thedegree of children’s and adolescents’ school attachment. ComprehensiveSchool Climate Assessment Scale dimensions (teacher-student relationshipand student activities) and Quality of Life Scale dimensions (studentstudentrelationship and school management) were used to measure thequality of the school environment. The model was tested using LISREL 8.3with maximum likelihood estimation.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMIR, K., KARABEYOGLU, Y. A. (2022). Factors Associated with Absenteeism in High Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 62, 37–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/507227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acarbay, F. Y. (2006). Kapsamlı okul iklimini değerlendirme ölçeğinin (öğrenci formu) Türkçe dilsel eşdeğerlik güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması, (Reliability and validity study of Turkish linguistic equivalence of comprehensive school climate scale (student form). Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi.
  2. Akar-Vural, R., Yılmaz-Ozelci, S., Cengel, M. & Gomleksiz, M. (2013). The development of the “sense of belonging to school” scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 215-230.
  3. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70, 87-107.
  4. Altinkurt, Y. (2008). Ogrenci devamsizliklarinin nedenleri ve devamsizligin akademik basariya olan etkisi. (The reasons for students irregular attendance and the effect on this students irregular attendance on their academic achievement). Dumlupinar Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 129-142.
  5. Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411-423.
  6. Balfanz, R. & Byrnes, V. (2012). Chronic absenteeism: summarizing what we know from nationally available data. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools. Barrington, B. & Hendricks, B. (1989). Differentiating characteristics of high school graduates, dropouts and nongraduates. Journal of Educational Research, 86(6), 309–319.
  7. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models, 136–162.
  8. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Pub. Casserly, K. R., Carpenter, A. S., & Halcón, L. (2001). Adolescent parenting: relationship to school attendance and achievement. The Journal of School Nursing, 17, 329-335.
  9. Chen, C. & Stevenson, H.W., (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asia-American, Caucasian, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215-1234.
  10. Clark, J. G. (2008). Examining truancy board effectiveness in countering student absenteeism in grades K-5 in three title I schools in Northeast Tennessee. Doctoral Dissertation, East Tennessee State University, UMI Number: 3308020. Corley, F. (2012). Legislative mandates concerning truancy effects on attendance rates. Master Thesis. Marshall University. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in Afri