Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 71

Relationship between University Performance and Dimensions of Intellectual Capital: An Empirical Investigation

Pages
215–232
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings: Findings revealed that universities need to operate in close interactions with government institutions and private industries that help enhance relational capital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: India is the second largest higher education system in the world and 50% of its population is under 25 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Present study tries to explore the relationship between intellectual capital and university performance across North India with an objective of providing fruitful insights to the policy makers about the areas of focus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings: Findings revealed that universities need to operate in close interactions with government institutions and private industries that help enhance relational capital.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: India is the second largest higher education system in the world and 50% of its population is under 25 years. This demographic advantage can be leveraged only if India has a formidable higher education system. Present study tries to explore the relationship between intellectual capital and university performance across North India with an objective of providing fruitful insights to the policy makers about the areas of focus. Research Method: Quantitative research design was used for the study. Respondents of the study were comprised of faculty members of universities from selected North Indian states. Regression analysis using SPSS was employed to study the relationship between the two dimensions of intellectual capital and university performance. Findings: Findings revealed that universities need to operate in close interactions with government institutions and private industries that help enhance relational capital. Organizational capital emerged as a major dimension that affects university performance. The study gives university policy makers tools in the form of organizational and relational capital that can be leveraged to enhance performance. Implications for Research and Practice: These findings are pertinent for the top management of universities which can focus on strengthening relational capital by building strong relationships with alumni and industry, facilitating consulting and having consistent interactions with stakeholders in order to enhance university performance. Results imply that in addition to relying on teaching expertise and teaching pedagogy, planners need to focus equally or more.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, R., CHATTERJI, N. (2022). Relationship between University Performance and Dimensions of Intellectual Capital: An Empirical Investigation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 71, 215–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/507185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alvarez, I.G., Dominguez, L.R., & Sanchez, I.M.G.(2010). Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: content and explanatory factors. Online Information Review, 35(3), 360-385.
  2. Balaji, P., & Kumar, V. (2011). Use of web technology in providing information services by south Indian technological universities as displayed on library websites. Library Hi Tech, 29(3), 470-495.
  3. Bektas, C., & Tayauova, G.(2014). A Model Suggestion for Improving the Efficiency of Higher Education: University- Industry Co-operation. Social and Behavioral Sciences,116, 2270-2274.
  4. Bigliardi, B., & Dormio, A.I. (2010). A balanced scorecard approach for R&D: evidence from a case study. Facilities, 28(5/6), 278-289.
  5. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops, measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
  6. Canibano, L., & Sanchez, M.P.(2009). Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting,13(2), 93-104.
  7. Chakrabarti, A.K., & Santoro, M.D.(2004). Building social capital and learning environment in university-industry relationships. Int. J. Learning and Intellectual Capital,1(1). Chan, D., & Lo,W.(2007). Running Universities as Enterprises: University Governance Changes in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education,27(3),305-322.
  8. Charles, D. (2006). Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems. Innovation:The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19(1), 117-130.
  9. Coates, H., R., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). “A crıtıcal examınatıon of the effects of learnıng management systems on university teahıng and learning.” Tertiary Education and Management, 11(19), 19-36.
  10. Datta, S., & Saad, M.(2008). Social capital and university-industry-government networks in offshore outsourcing-the case of India. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,20(6), 741-754.
  11. Dill, D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: the organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher Education,29(4), 369-384.
  12. Doctor, G.(2008). Capturing intellectual capital with an institutional repository at a business school in India. Library Hi Tech, 26(1),110-125.
  13. Doctor, G., & Ramachandran. S.(2008).DSpace@IBSA: knowledge sharing in a management institute. VINE,38(1), 42-52.
  14. Edgar, F., & Geare, A.(2011). Factors influencing university research performance. Studies in Higher Education,38(5), 774-792.
  15. Etkowitz, H., Webster, A., G