Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 71

The Impact of Socio-cultural factors on females passing through Higher Education in Pakistan

Pages
193–214
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed females who do succeed in getting a higher education are then exposed to a male dominant culture in the workplace.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Educated females play an important role in the social and economic development of a country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research Methods: Using a higher education survey questionnaire, data were collected from 2188 female respondents including students (n=2018) and teachers (n=170) from government colleges and universities spread over four districts of the Pakistan province of Punjab.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed females who do succeed in getting a higher education are then exposed to a male dominant culture in the workplace.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Educated females play an important role in the social and economic development of a country. The aim of the study was to assess the problems facing females before entering higher education, and then after education when joining professions. Research Methods: Using a higher education survey questionnaire, data were collected from 2188 female respondents including students (n=2018) and teachers (n=170) from government colleges and universities spread over four districts of the Pakistan province of Punjab. Results showed females who do succeed in getting a higher education are then exposed to a male dominant culture in the workplace. This re-inforces the socio-cultural norms of the country at large; causes conflict between professional and cultural obligations, and is linked with de-motivation. Four types of female have been identified who respond to the socio-culture in stereotypical ways. System successes have survived discrimination inherent in the wider society with family support. System fighters, lacking whole-hearted family support, perceive discrimination strongly but have an intrinsic motivation that drives them on. Motivated realists appear to have accommodated to the sociocultural practices of Pakistan, and have planned how to 'beat the system' to eventually become system successes. Neutral acceptors can be contrasted with system fighters as they appear to lack intrinsic motivation, accept the external socio-cultural world with minimal challenge. Implications for Research and Practice: The results of the study provide guidelines to the policy makers and administrators to make amendments in the higher education policy where female can avail more opportunities to get higher education and social recognition as they have the significant contribution in the development of a sustainable society.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHAUKAT, S., PELL, A. W. (2022). The Impact of Socio-cultural factors on females passing through Higher Education in Pakistan. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 71, 193–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/507180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahmed, N. (1984). Evaluation process in education system. Islamabad, Pakistan: AIOU. Anderberg, M. R., Cluster analysis for applications, Academic Press, New York, 1973
  2. Batool, S.Q., Sajid, M.A. and Ur-Rehman, M. (2013).Gender and Higher Education in Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15(6), 780-789.
  3. Chliwniak, L. (1997). Higher education leadership: Analyzing the gender gap. Washington, DC: Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale NJ: Earlbaum. Cohen, L., Manion, M. and Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education. Sixth Edition. New York: Routledge. Duff, A. (1997) A note of reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle and Tait's.Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 529-539.
  4. Farah, I. & Shera, S. (2007) Female Education in Pakistan: A Review. In R. Qureshi and J. F. A. Rarieya (eds.) Gender & Education in Pakistan (pp.3-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press Gardner, P.L. (1995) Measuring Attitudes to Science: Unidimensionality and Internal Consistency Revisited, Research in Science Education 25 (3), 283-289.
  5. Gardner, P.L. (1996) The dimensionality of attitude scales: a widely misunderstood idea, International Journal of Science Education 18 (8), 913-919.
  6. Gracia, L (2009). Employability and higher education: contextualizing female students’ workplace experiences to enhance understanding of employability development. Journal of Education and Work, 22 (4), 301-318.
  7. HEC. (2012). HEC Recognized Universities and Degree Awarding Institutions. Retrieved from September 12, 2012 from http://www.hec.gov.pk/ourinstitutes/pages/default.aspx
  8. Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Executive Women and the Myth of Having it All. Harvard Business Review. Isani, U.A.G. & Virk, M. L. (2003). Higher education in Pakistan. A historical futuristic perspective. Islamabad. Pakistan: Roohani Art Press.
  9. Jacobs, J. A. (1996). Gender inequality and higher education, Annual Review Socialogy, 22, 153–85
  10. Khalid, H.S., & Mukhtar, E.M. (2002).The future of girl’s education in Pakistan: A study on policy measures and other factors determining girls’ education. Islamabad, Pakistan: UNESCO. Khan, A. (2007). Gender issues in higher education in Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Maktaba Jadeed Press.
  11. Komuhangiro, S., Urassa, J.K. & Makauki, A.F. (2003). Reasons for small proportion of female students