Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 73

An Evaluation of the Vocabulary in Turkish Textbooks Before and After the Constructivist Approach in the Context of Frequency

Pages
113–130
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been determined that, among words thatdo not have synonyms, the same book after the introduction of the constructivist approach shows apreference for words used with less frequency.Implications for Research and Practice: The word lists for each level should be made in the contextof frequency of use in textbooks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Research shows that students in Turkey aretaught to write with much smaller vocabularies thanstudents in other countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the aid of random sampling, informative texts with “Nature and Universe” themesthat were used in 2001-2002 and 2013-2014 in secondary schools were chosen as samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been determined that, among words thatdo not have synonyms, the same book after the introduction of the constructivist approach shows apreference for words used with less frequency.Implications for Research and Practice: The word lists for each level should be made in the contextof frequency of use in textbooks.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2001-2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Research shows that students in Turkey aretaught to write with much smaller vocabularies thanstudents in other countries. Along with theconstructivist approach, the frequency of words usedin texts should be high, and unknown words shouldbe at certain levels in order to allow for production,cognizance and creation of information based onexisting information.The aim of this research is to analyze the vocabulary in Turkish textbooks before and after theintroduction of the constructivist approach on the basis of frequency and origin.Method: The research was conducted using a general screening model composed of the words usedin informative texts in Turkish textbooks before and after the introduction of the constructivistapproach. With the aid of random sampling, informative texts with “Nature and Universe” themesthat were used in 2001-2002 and 2013-2014 in secondary schools were chosen as samples. Frequencyand percentage proportions were made in a descriptive way in order to compare the numbers of thesame and different lemmas. T-test and Mann Whitney U test were used to determinemeaningfulness.Findings: While there is not a significant difference in frequency between TBCA and TACA in theTurkish, Arabic, Persian and western-based words. It has been determined that, among words thatdo not have synonyms, the same book after the introduction of the constructivist approach shows apreference for words used with less frequency.Implications for Research and Practice: The word lists for each level should be made in the contextof frequency of use in textbooks.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLİDÜZGÜN, Ş. (2022). An Evaluation of the Vocabulary in Turkish Textbooks Before and After the Constructivist Approach in the Context of Frequency. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 73, 113–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/507160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adali, O. (2004). Turkiye Turkcesinde bicimbirimler [Morphemes in Turkish](2. Basım). Istanbul: Papatya Yayıncılık Egitim. Aksan, D. (1982). Her yonuyle dil-Ana cizgileriyle dilbilim [Language in all Perspective- Linguistics within Basic Lines]. Ankara:
  2. Turk Dil Kurumu. Aksan, D. (1997). Anlambilim: Anlambilim konulari ve Turkcenin anlambilimi [Semantics: Topics in semantics and Turkish semantics ]. Ankara:
  3. Engin Yayınevi.
  4. Aksan, Y., Mersinli, U. & Yaldir, Y. (2011). İlkogretim Turkce ders kitaplari derlemi ve Turkce ulusal dil derlemi orneklemindeki sozcuk sikliklari [The corpus of Turkish textbooks and the word frequency in the sample of Turkish National Corpus]. In: Günay, D. et al (Eds). (2011). Turkce ogretimi uzerine calismalar, 397- 408. İzmir:
  5. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi. Aksan, Y. et al. (2012). Construction of the Turkish National Corpus (TNC). Proceedings Of The Eight İnternational Conference On Language Resources And Evaluation (LREC 2012). Istanbul. Turkiye. http://www.lrec- conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/papers.html Apaydin, N. (2010). 6. sinif Turkce ders kitaplarinin soz varligi acisindan incelenmesi [The evaluation of Turkish textbooks in the context of vocabulary ]. [M.A. Thesis, Marmara Universitesi, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu]. Ari, G. (2003). İlkogretim altinci sinif ders kitaplarindaki kelimeler ve bu kelimelerin kullanilabilirligi [The vocabulary in the 6th Grade in primary education and the usage of these]. [M. A. Thesis, Marmara Universitesi, Istanbul] Buyukozturk, S, Cakmak, K. E., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Cotuksoken, Y. (2012). Turkce anlamdaslar ve karsitanlamlilar sozlugu [The dictinary of Turkish synonyms and antonyms]. Istanbul: Papatya. Author. (2013). The efficiency of secondary school Turkish students in using cohesive devices. 13. Uluslararası Dil, Yazin ve Deyişbilim Sempozyumu: Basit Uslup, 1169-1182.
  7. Author. (2014). Turkçe ogretiminde sozcuk ogretim yontemlerinin yeterliligi [The efficiency of vocabulary teaching methods in Turkish language teaching]. Adiyaman Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 17, 233-258.
  8. Eren, H. (1999). Turk dilinin etimolojik sozlugu [The etymological dictionary of Turkish]. Ankara:
  9. Bizim Buro Basim Evi. Goz, I. (2003). Yazili Turkcenin kelime sikligi sozlugu [The frequency dictionary of written Turkish]. Ankara:
  10. TDK Gunes, F. (2013). Turkçe ogretimi. Yaklaşimlar ve modeller [Turkis