SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 82

The Contribution of Test Type and Curriculum Difference on the Effect of the National Test Score at International Mathematic Test Score: The Challenge of IR 4.0 Curriculum

Setyabudi INDARTONO
Anwaril HAMIDY
Pages
191–202
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results showed that the different curriculum used at the mathematics learning process and test types had a moderate effect of National on International test score in a mathematics course.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The students’ competencies of math are required to be assessed by using an international scale of evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research Methods: This study employed 600 students of private and public Junior High Schools in Indonesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results showed that the different curriculum used at the mathematics learning process and test types had a moderate effect of National on International test score in a mathematics course.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The students’ competencies of math are required to be assessed by using an international scale of evaluation. Thus, education policies and learning evaluation are developed by educational policymakers to improve the education system and result quality. Hence, the purpose of this research was to investigate The Contribution of International Mathematics Test Type and Curriculum Difference on the Effect of the National Test Score on International Mathematics Test Score. Research Methods: This study employed 600 students of private and public Junior High Schools in Indonesia. The Mathematics Test Types included were PISA-like and TIMSS-like. They were used to represent the type of test. The model of curriculums applied in Junior High School in Indonesia used in this study was KTSP and K13. The multiple regression was used to analyze the data. Findings: The National Test Score had a stronger effect on International Mathematics Test Score for KTSP curriculum implementation rather than K13 curriculum, and National Test Score had a stronger effect on International Mathematics Test Score for PISA type of International mathematic test rather than TIMSS one. These results showed that the different curriculum used at the mathematics learning process and test types had a moderate effect of National on International test score in a mathematics course. Implications for Research and Practice: It implies an increase in the policymakers to pay more attention to the curriculum design and type of learning evaluation. It is suggested that future research should include learning and teaching types to find out a deeper behavioral and attitudinal understanding of learning and teaching of mathematics.

🔖

Cite This Article

INDARTONO, S., HAMIDY, A. (2022). The Contribution of Test Type and Curriculum Difference on the Effect of the National Test Score at International Mathematic Test Score: The Challenge of IR 4.0 Curriculum. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 82, 191–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/507138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Amat Jaedun, V. Lilik Hariyanto, Nuryadin, E. R. (2014). An evaluation of the implementation of Curriculum 2013 at the building construction department of vocational high schoos in Yogyakarta. Journal of Education, 7(1), 14–22.
  2. Argina, A. W., Mitra, D., Ijabah, N., & Setiawan, R. (2017). INDONESIAN PISA RESULT: WHAT FACTORS AND WHAT SHOULD BE FIXED ? Proceedings Education and Language International Conference, 1(1), 69–79.
  3. Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., Loyalka, P., Schmidt, W. H., & Zakharov, A. (2016). Revisiting the Relationship Between International Assessment Outcomes and Educational Production: Evidence From a Longitudinal. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1054–1085. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216653180
  4. Chow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2018). Language domains differentially predict mathematics performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.011
  5. Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., & Gençay, E. (2019). Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies, 7(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7010010
  6. Dekant, K., Sungur, S., & Yerdelen, S. (2018). Predicting Science Engagement with Motivation and Teacher Characteristics: a Multilevel Investigation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 67–88.
  7. Fung, D. (2019). Re-thinking the higher education curriculum: Challenges, possibilities, and dreams. Places of Engagement, 82–87.
  8. Hayes, A. (2013).
  9. PROCESS model templates. New York, NY: Guilford. https://doi.org/978-1-60918-230-4
  10. Ilma, Z., & Pratama, R. K. (2015). Transformation in Indonesian Language Curriculum: Pros and Cons between KTSP 2006 and Curriculum 2013 in Indonesia, 2013– 2016. https://doi.org/10.15242/icehm.ed0315007
  11. Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., Lüdtke, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2019). The dimensional structure of students ’ self-concept and interest in science depends on course composition. Learning and Instruction, 60(October 2018), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.001
  12. Kaleli-Yılmaz, G., & Hanci, A. (2015). Examination of the 8th grade students ’ TIMSS mathematics success in terms of different variables. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Technology, 47(5), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1102977
  13. Lam, T. Y. P., & Lau, K. C. (2014). International Journal of Science Examining Factors Affecting Science Achievement of Hong Kong in PISA 2006 Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Internat