Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 81

School Leaders’ Insights Regarding Beginning Teachers’ Induction in Belgium, Finland and Portugal

Pages
57–78
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nevertheless, this consensus is not total, as they value differently, in breadth and depth, the other dimensions, which must be analyzed in the light of the idiosyncrasies of each educational system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Although new teachers’ induction is a key issue of principals’ work, there’s still little research on this.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research method: It built on a questionnaire applied to 1654 principals in three countries. 261 principals replied to the questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nevertheless, this consensus is not total, as they value differently, in breadth and depth, the other dimensions, which must be analyzed in the light of the idiosyncrasies of each educational system.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Although new teachers’ induction is a key issue of principals’ work, there’s still little research on this. Occurring within the frame of a EU project, the goal of the study was to perceive the main needs of principals to support beginning teachers in Belgium (Flanders), Finland and Portugal. Research method: It built on a questionnaire applied to 1654 principals in three countries. 261 principals replied to the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis were used, and a comparative test involving the countries under analysis was performed.Findings: The most relevant needs referred to professional/organizational development and pedagogical leadership, comprising implementation of supervisory devices and ICT integration in the classroom. Principals stressed the need to support new teachers to promote differentiated pedagogy, critical reflection and collaborative practices. Moreover, we found significant differences between countries: Belgians presented the highest scores in all dimensions, followed by the Portuguese and the Finish, respectively. Conclusions: There’s a consensus on the relevance of principals’ action as pedagogical leaders, with a great focus on collaboration as a methodology of work among teachers, and reflection as an opportunity for professional growth and learning. Traditionally, this issue concerned only teachers. Currently, there seems to be a shift towards a commitment of principals to become more directly involved in driving teachers’ practices and teaching processes. Nevertheless, this consensus is not total, as they value differently, in breadth and depth, the other dimensions, which must be analyzed in the light of the idiosyncrasies of each educational system.

🔖

Cite This Article

COSMA, E., ALMEIDA, M., PINHO, A. S., PIPA, J. (2022). School Leaders’ Insights Regarding Beginning Teachers’ Induction in Belgium, Finland and Portugal. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 81, 57–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/507134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Almeida, M. (2014). Développement professionnel des enseignants de l'enseignement supérieur: la transition entre les profils d'orientation pédagogique. La Recherche en Éducation, (14), 42-78.
  2. Angelle, P.S. (2002). Mentoring the beginning teacher: Providing assistance in differentially effective middle schools. The High School Journal, 86, 15-27. Ärlestig, H. (2008). Communication between principals and teachers in successful schools. (Doctoral dissertation). Umeå/Sweden: FSC, Umeå University. Retrieved from www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:142460/fulltext03 Ärlestig, H., Day, C., & Johansson, O. (2016). A decade of research on school principals: Cases from 24 countries. Cham: Springer. Avalos, B. (2016). Learning from Research on Beginning Teachers. In J. Loughran & L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education, I, 487-522. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_13 Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing schools come out on top. London: McKinsey. Blase, J. R., & Blase, J. (2002). Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional leadership and implications. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 256-264.
  3. Bubb, S. (2003) A newly qualified teacher’s manual. How to meet the induction standards. London: David Fulton. Bubb, S., Earley, P., & Totterdell, M. (2005). Accountability and responsibility: 'Rogue' school leaders and the induction of new teachers in England. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 255-272.
  4. Cherian, F., & Daniel, Y. (2008). Principal leadership in new teacher induction: Becoming agents of change. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(2), 1-11.
  5. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Stayers, leavers, lovers, and dreamers. Insight about teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 387-392.
  6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  7. Cohen-Scali, V. (2003). The influence of family, social, and work socialization on the construction of the professional identity of young adults. Journal of Career Development, 29, 237-249. Retrieved from http://jcd.sagepub.com/cgi/content7refs/29/4/237.
  8. Costa, E., & Almeida, M. (2016). Formação-ação e autoavaliação de escolas: um contributo para o desenvolvimento organizacional e profissional dos professores. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 47, 73-93.
  9. Cruz, M.F. (2006). Desarrollo profesional docente. Granada: Grupo Editorial Universitário. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006)