Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 84

Rasch-Based Objective Standard Setting for University Placement Test

Pages
57–70
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of OSS produced the cut-scores of

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: University placement test is an important admission policy priority in Nigeria, because it serves as a university-based selection criterion for placement of students into undergraduate programs in Nigeria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: To demonstrate the application of OSS, 9 judges were employed for the conduct of standard ratings; the data used for Rasch calibration with WINSTEP were the responses of 600 students on the 60 items validated Economics Placement Test (EPT).Findings: The experts’ ratings and Rasch generated logits (item difficulties) were used in quantifying the set of essential items selected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of OSS produced the cut-scores of
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: University placement test is an important admission policy priority in Nigeria, because it serves as a university-based selection criterion for placement of students into undergraduate programs in Nigeria. Although recently attention have been shifted on the call to develop a standard content and standardize the test, yet attention has not been paid on the development of standard setting in which the decisions to select or reject the applicants are made. This study; therefore, investigated the application Rasch-based Objective Standard Setting (OSS) to establish the standards in a university placement test. Methods: To demonstrate the application of OSS, 9 judges were employed for the conduct of standard ratings; the data used for Rasch calibration with WINSTEP were the responses of 600 students on the 60 items validated Economics Placement Test (EPT).Findings: The experts’ ratings and Rasch generated logits (item difficulties) were used in quantifying the set of essential items selected. Results of OSS produced the cut-scores of

🔖

Cite This Article

IBRAHIM, A., EMBONG, R., ISMAIL, M. S., MOHAMED, H. B., TALIB, R., BICHI, A. A. (2022). Rasch-Based Objective Standard Setting for University Placement Test. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 84, 57–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/507133

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akanwa, U. N. & Nkwocha, P. C. (2015). Prediction of South Eastern Nigerian students under graduate scores with their UME and Post-UME Scores. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(5), PP 36-39
  2. Angoff, W. (1971). Scales, norms and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp 506-600).
  3. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Atkinson, R. C., & Geiser, S. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 665-676.
  4. Barlow, P. B. (2014). Development of the Biostatistics and clinical epidemiology skills assessment for medical residents. Doctoral thesis, University of Tennessee Bejar, I. I. (2008). Standard setting: What is it? Why is it important. R& D Connections, 7,1-6.
  5. Bichi, A. A. (2015). Analysis of UTME and Post-UTME scores of education students at Northwest University Kano-Nigeria. In 1st International Conference on Education. Held on 9th-10th April 2015 at Novotel Beijing Xinqiao, Beijing China Bichi, A. A., Talib, R., Atan, N. A., Ibrahim, H. & Yusof, S. M. (2019). Validation of a developed university placement test using classical test theory and Rasch measurement approach. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, Volume-6, Issue-6, Pp: 22-29
  6. Bichi, A. A., Talib, R., Mohamed, H., Ahamad, J. & Khairuddin, N. (2019). Exploratory sequential design to develop and validate Economics placement test for Nigerian universities. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), Volume-7, Issue-6S5, Pp: 769-772
  7. Carey, K., & Manwaring, R. (2011). Growth Models and Accountability: A recipe for remaking ESEA. Education Sector Reports. Education Sector. Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. SAGE Publications Ltd. Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials of educational measurement, Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Ikoghode, A. (2015). Post-UTME screening in Nigerian universities: How relevant today?. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(8), 101-116.
  8. Karasar, N. (2016). Scientific research method. Ankara:
  9. Nobel Akademik Yayincilik Khatimin, N., Aziz, A. A., Zaharim, A., & Yasin, S. H. M. (2013). Development of objective standard setting using Rasch measurement model in Malaysian institution of higher learning. International Education Studies, 6(6), 151-160.
  10. Khatimin, N., Zaharim, A., & Aziz, A. A. (2014, December). Standard setting in students’ assessmen