Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 80

Impacts of Urban Institutions of Higher Education on the Community: A Social Approach

Pages
39–58
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Researchers may also takeinto account more educational institutions of higher education in other contexts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectsof urban institutions of higher education on socialsustainability of the community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Questionnaires and interviews were administered to 120 local residents and 1470 students and college employees (office and teaching staff) living in the nearby communities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Researchers may also takeinto account more educational institutions of higher education in other contexts.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectsof urban institutions of higher education on socialsustainability of the community. Three urban colleges in Vietnam were involved in this study. Methods: Questionnaires and interviews were administered to 120 local residents and 1470 students and college employees (office and teaching staff) living in the nearby communities. In the interviews, the researcher made efforts to explore in-depth information by providing prompts in order toconfirm, interpret and supplement the quantitativedata collected from the questionnaires.Findings: All participants responded that thecolleges contributed greatly to the social equitythrough rentals, food consumption, and otherservices available. However, though some localresidents took a positive view of social diversity,others were conservative. The social cohesions tookplace in the community where its members werewilling to welcome new cultures. Most local residentswere not confident about community security whenthere were many new members. Noise and traffic also caused much concern to local residents.Implications for Research and Practice: It is suggested that local residents should distributeequital gains to physically and financially challenged people in the community. Otherimplications were given to researchers, policy makers, community members, and studenttenants living around college. Further studies can take a holistic approach to sustainabledevelopment as a result of the effects of educational institutions. Researchers may also takeinto account more educational institutions of higher education in other contexts.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUNG, B. P. (2022). Impacts of Urban Institutions of Higher Education on the Community: A Social Approach. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 80, 39–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/507131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Adams, W. M. (2006). The future of sustainability: Rethinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Bagceli Kahraman, P. & Onur Sezer, G. (2017). Relationship between attitudes of multicultural education and perceptions regarding cultural effect of globalization. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 67, 233-249. Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2017.67.14. Cato, S. M. (2009). Green economics. Earthscan Publications: London. Cook, S. & Esuna, D. (2014) Rethinking social development for post-2015 world. Development, 57(1), 30-35.
  2. Dave, S. (2011). Neighborhood density and social sustainability in cities and urban countries. Sustainable Development, 19, 189-206. Doi: 10.1002/sd.433. Davidson, M. (2010). Social sustainability and the city. Geography Compass, 4(7), 872- 880. Doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S. & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289-300. Doi: 10.1002/sd.417 Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hayden, M. & Thiep, L. Q. (2007). Institutional autonomy for higher education in Vietnam. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(1), 73-85. Doi: 10.1080/07294360601166828. Hoa, C. T. H. & Vien, T. (2018). The integration of intercultural education into teaching English: What Vietnamese teachers do and say. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 441-456. Doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12129a. Hung, B. P. (2017). Vietnamese students learning the semantics of English prepositions. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(4). 146-158. Doi: 10.17576/gema-2017-1704-10.
  3. Hung, B. P., Truong, V. & Nguyen, N. V. (2018). Students’ responses to CL-based teaching of English prepositions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 73(3), 41-58. Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2018.73.3. Hung, B. P. & Van, L. (2018). Depicting and outlining as pre-writing strategies: Experimental results and learners’ opinions. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 451-464. Doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11231a. Hung, B. P., Vien, T. & Vu, N. N. (2018). Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching English prepositions: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 327-346. Doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11323a. Johansson, T.; Segerstedt, E.; Olofsson, T. & Jakobsson, M. (2016). Revealing s