Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 88

Schema of Analogical Reasoning - Thinking Process in Example Analogies Problem

Pages
97–104
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And then, teachers need to develop an analogical problem that candevelop critical and creative thinking to enhance the creativity of high school students withtheir analogical reasoning

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Analogical reasoning has been studiedusing a variety of tasks that generally requiredconsideration of the relationship between the objectand its integration to conclude an analog schema.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were taken from 16-year-old high schoolstudents, West Nusa Tenggara Indonesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And then, teachers need to develop an analogical problem that candevelop critical and creative thinking to enhance the creativity of high school students withtheir analogical reasoning
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Analogical reasoning has been studiedusing a variety of tasks that generally requiredconsideration of the relationship between the objectand its integration to conclude an analog schema. Theaim of this study was to describe the model ofanalogical reasoning schema based on someanalogical problems.Research Method: In this study used a qualitativeresearch approach with design research is the casestudy. Data were taken from 16-year-old high schoolstudents, West Nusa Tenggara Indonesia. Theresearcher selected 4 students who answered twoanalogical problems correctly and used in analyzingqualitative data. Findings: The findings showed that there is a difference in the schema. The first type is thatstudents can directly map between target problem and source problem, followed bystructuring, applying, and verifying. The second type is that the student can not directly mapbetween the target problem with the source problem, but the student needs to do arepresentation of the target problem so as to find a form of problem that has similarities withthe source problem. Then the student can map between target problem with source problem,followed by doing the process as the first schema type.The Implication for Research and Practice: Findings of this study may have an impact on theway teachers teach mathematics on the analogical problems they use. Teachers can considermathematical problems used in learning so that students easily understand the theory fromthe concepts being taught. And then, teachers need to develop an analogical problem that candevelop critical and creative thinking to enhance the creativity of high school students withtheir analogical reasoning

🔖

Cite This Article

KRISTAYULITA, K., NUSANTARA, T., AS’ARI, A. R., SA’DIJAH, C. (2022). Schema of Analogical Reasoning - Thinking Process in Example Analogies Problem. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 88, 97–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/507121

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Amir-Mofidi, S., Amiripour, P., & Bijan-Zadeh, M. H. (2012). Instruction of mathematical concepts through analogical reasoning skills. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2916–2922. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i6.12
  2. Assmus, D., Forster, F., & Fritzlar, T. (2014). Analogizing during mathematical problem solving-theoretical and empirical considerations. In Proceeding of the Joint Meeting of PME (Vol. 38, pp. 73–80). Retrieved from https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1620514/285455/PME38- 2014%20Vancouver%202.pdf#page=83 Bassok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, 401–433.
  3. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Analogical Problem Construction and Transfer in Mathematical Problem Solving. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 137–150. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020043841
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EbogAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd& pg=PP1&dq=Reseach+Design:+Qualitative,+Quantitative,+and+Mixed+Meth ods+Approaches.&ots=cbaQvRMzE3&sig=noU93mpCThgY41T49ShXjBVvou o DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263–287. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
  5. English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GCqRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd &pg=PP1&dq=Mathematical+and+analogical+reasoning+of+young+learners &ots=oXoAt3Ad_U&sig=DVbtiQwggdS6COnnz916j6iqZF4 Eveleth, D. M. (2016). Analogical reasoning: When a non-expert reasons like an expert. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 1(1), 28-40. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ca d=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjk55T9jvTqAhWZFzQIHa2rDegQFjANegQIBh AB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fjbam.scholasticahq.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fattachm ents%2F1959%2Fdownload&usg=AOvVaw31bXCwTjRSPP7Z6UUOiPWj Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709c0g0702_3
  6. Gentner, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy: Introduction. American Psychologist, 52, 32–34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.52.1.32 Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.). (2001). The analogical min