Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90

Verba Volant, Scripta Manent: Writing Habits of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers

Pages
159–184
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Acombination of descriptive and predictive statistics was used, alongside content analysis toanalyze all of the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.Findings: The findings revealed that the pre-service elementary teachers frequently appliedspelling and punctuation rules and consider themselves decent writers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Writing is the most challenging languageskill that is acquired the last.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Previous studiesdemonstrated that problems had been experienced inthe acquisition of writing skills and habit at the alleducational levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Acombination of descriptive and predictive statistics was used, alongside content analysis toanalyze all of the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.Findings: The findings revealed that the pre-service elementary teachers frequently appliedspelling and punctuation rules and consider themselves decent writers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Writing is the most challenging languageskill that is acquired the last. Previous studiesdemonstrated that problems had been experienced inthe acquisition of writing skills and habit at the alleducational levels. Thus, elementary teachers andpre-service elementary teachers have significantresponsibility in the acquisition of writing skills andtransformation of these skills into a habit. The presentstudy aims to examine what pre-service elementaryteachers' writing habits are like.Research Methods: This research featured 374 preservice elementary teachers and was based around anexplanatory-sequential mixed-method design. Aboutthe qualitative portion of this study, seven studentsare currently doing their practicums in a fourthgrade setting.Received: 28 Jan. 2020Received in revised form: 05 Aug. 2020Accepted: 18 Sept. 2020DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2020.90.9KeywordsWriting strategies, writing skills, languageskills, writing proficiency, writing habitThe data were collected using a “writing habit scale” and a semi-structured interview form. Acombination of descriptive and predictive statistics was used, alongside content analysis toanalyze all of the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.Findings: The findings revealed that the pre-service elementary teachers frequently appliedspelling and punctuation rules and consider themselves decent writers. They also occasionallyused writing as a means of communication and employ writing strategies; however, very fewwrite for creative purposes. The qualitative findings, on the other hand, showed that the preservice elementary teachers faced certain obstacles and difficulties regarding the actualprocess of writing.Implications for Research and Practice: The findings obtained in this study suggest that preservice elementary teachers mostly write within the context of learning and socialcommunication and that they face setbacks when it comes to being able to write in more formalcommunicative and creative contexts. What can, thus, be concluded is that pre-serviceelementary teachers ought to receive formal training in writing as well as be encouraged towrite.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUNER-OZER, M., BOYACI, S. D. B. (2022). Verba Volant, Scripta Manent: Writing Habits of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90, 159–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/507112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aksan, D. (1998). Her yonuyle dil ana cizgileriyle dil bilim. Ankara:
  2. TDK Yayinlari. Arici, A. F. (2008). Universite ogrencilerinin yazili anlatim hatalari. Uludag Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 21(2), 209-220.
  3. Arici, A. F., & Ungan, S. (2008). Ilkogretim ikinci kademe ogrencilerinin yazili anlatim calismalarinin bazi yonlerden degerlendirilmesi. Dumlupinar Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 317-328.
  4. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
  5. Bas, G., & Sahin, C. (2013). Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin yazma egilimlerinin farkli degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 32-42.
  6. Bastug, M. (2015). Ilkokul dorduncu sinif ogrencilerinin yazma egilimi, tutumu ve yazma tutuklugunun yazma basarisi uzerine etkisi. Egitim ve Bilim, 40(180), 73-88.
  7. Benevides, T., & Stagg Peterson, S. (2010). Literacy attitudes, habits, and achievements of future teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 36(3), 291-302.
  8. Brender, A. (1998). Conferencing: An interactive way to teach writing. The Language Teacher, 22(7), Retrieved from http://jaltpublications.org/old_tlt/files/98/jul/brender.html
  9. Brilliant, J.J. (2005). Writing as an act of courage: The inner experience of developmental writers. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(7), 505-516.
  10. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  11. Buyukkarci, A., & Muldur, M. (2017). Teknoloji kullaniminin yazma becerisine yansimalarina iliskin ogretmen gorusleri. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 27, 22-38.
  12. Buyukozturk, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi. Ankara:
  13. Pegem Akademi. Chambless, M. S., & Bass, J. A. (1995). Effecting changes in student teachers’ attitudes toward writing. Reading Research and Instruction, 35(2), 153-160.
  14. Clark, C., & Dugdale, G. (2009). Young people’s writing: Attitudes, behavior and the role of technology. London: National Literacy Trust. Colby, S., & Stapleton, N. (2006). Preservice teachers teach writing: Implications for teacher educators. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(4), 353-376.
  15. Coskun, E. (2011). Yazma egitiminde asamali gelisim. In M. Ozbay (Ed.), Yazma egitimi (pp. 49-89). Ankara:
  16. Pegem Akademi Yayincilik. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design