SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90

Does Public Leadership Improve School Effectiveness through Strengthening Teacher Professionalism?

Seval KOCAK
Aynur BOZKURT
Pages
19–44
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With this regard, the mediator role of teacherprofessionalism in the relationship between publicleadership and school effectiveness was determinedusing path analysis.Findings: The results of the study indicated that public leadership has a direct and indirectimpact on school effectiveness by enhancing teacher professionalism.Implications for Research and Practice: Given those school principals working at publicschools raise awareness of the concepts brought about the new understanding of publicmanagement is considered necessary, teacher professionalism should be contributed withinthe framework of public leadership, and school effectiveness should be sustained.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate themediating role of teacher professionalism in therelationship between public leadership behaviours ofadministrators in public schools and schooleffectiveness.Method: The present study was designed in acorrelational research model and conducted with 482teachers working in public schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Simple randomsampling was used in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With this regard, the mediator role of teacherprofessionalism in the relationship between publicleadership and school effectiveness was determinedusing path analysis.Findings: The results of the study indicated that public leadership has a direct and indirectimpact on school effectiveness by enhancing teacher professionalism.Implications for Research and Practice: Given those school principals working at publicschools raise awareness of the concepts brought about the new understanding of publicmanagement is considered necessary, teacher professionalism should be contributed withinthe framework of public leadership, and school effectiveness should be sustained.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate themediating role of teacher professionalism in therelationship between public leadership behaviours ofadministrators in public schools and schooleffectiveness.Method: The present study was designed in acorrelational research model and conducted with 482teachers working in public schools. Simple randomsampling was used in this study. The data werecollected using Public Leadership Scale, SchoolEffectiveness Index and Teacher ProfessionalismScale. With this regard, the mediator role of teacherprofessionalism in the relationship between publicleadership and school effectiveness was determinedusing path analysis.Findings: The results of the study indicated that public leadership has a direct and indirectimpact on school effectiveness by enhancing teacher professionalism.Implications for Research and Practice: Given those school principals working at publicschools raise awareness of the concepts brought about the new understanding of publicmanagement is considered necessary, teacher professionalism should be contributed withinthe framework of public leadership, and school effectiveness should be sustained.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAK, S., BOZKURT, A. (2022). Does Public Leadership Improve School Effectiveness through Strengthening Teacher Professionalism?. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90, 19–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/507107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abdurrezzak, S. (2015). Explore of teachers’ perceptions on effective school and school leadership.[Unpublished master’s thesis].Cumhuriyet University, Sivas. Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. OECD Education Working Papers. No. 187, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
  2. Akhan, A. (2009). Expectations of parents of private primany schools and levels of expectations: The sample of İstanbul in Eurapoen side.[ Unpublished master’s thesis].Yeditepe University, İstanbul.
  3. Arslan, H., Satıcı, A., & Kuru, M. (2007). A comparison of cultural and efficiency levels in state and private primary schools. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 51, 371-394.
  4. Arslantas, I., & Ozkan, M. (2014). Defining qualities of school administrators in effective schools from teachers and administrators point of view. International Journal of Social Science, 26, 181-193.
  5. Aydoğan, E. (2008). Eğitim sisteminde yeniden yapılanma ve özelleştirme adımları. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 3(6), 166-187.
  6. Ayik, A. & Ada, S. (2009). The relationship between the effectiveness of schools and the school culture which is created in primary schools. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 429-446. Baron,R.,M.&Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182
  7. Boonla, D., & Treputtharat, S. (2014). The relationship between the leadership style and school effectiveness in school under the Office of secondary education area 20. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 991-996.
  8. Brookes, S, (2011). Crisis confidence and collectivity: Responding to the new public leadership challenge. Leadership, 72(2), 175-194.
  9. Broussine, M., & Callahan R. F. (2016). Public management and governance.Public leadership. In T. Bovaird and E. Loeffler (Eds.),New York, NY: Routledge. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Multivariate applications series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2017). Okul gelişiminin bir yordayıcısı olarak öğreten profesyonalizmi. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 269-289.
  10. Carlgren, I. (1999). Professionalism and teachers as designers. Journal of Curriculum Studies 31(1), 43-56. Cerit