Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90

Philosophical Roots of Authentic Learning and Geography Education

Pages
185–204
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The naturalist approach involved in theclassical view within the philosophy of education; in other words, the use of real space ingeography education was the main field where authentic learning developed.Implications for Research and Practice: Given that authentic learning, which is not socommon in Turkey, is discussed in more studies and applications within the frame of this ideahas been considered crucial concerning the development of geography education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, the use of real environmentsin education and making students face real problemshas been taken as a basis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings: The findings showed that authentic learning underwent an intellectual preparationprocess the roots of which date back to the 16th-century philosopher Erasmus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The naturalist approach involved in theclassical view within the philosophy of education; in other words, the use of real space ingeography education was the main field where authentic learning developed.Implications for Research and Practice: Given that authentic learning, which is not socommon in Turkey, is discussed in more studies and applications within the frame of this ideahas been considered crucial concerning the development of geography education.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the use of real environmentsin education and making students face real problemshas been taken as a basis. The question “What is therelationship between the philosophical roots ofauthentic learning & geography education?” wasdetermined as the problem status of this study.Research Methods: The method of this study was adocument review. Accordingly, the philosophersselected by purposeful sampling within theeducational sciences intellectual history, and theirworks were retrospectively examined, and theintellectual roots of authentic learning wereinvestigated. Findings: The findings showed that authentic learning underwent an intellectual preparationprocess the roots of which date back to the 16th-century philosopher Erasmus. Erasmus,Comenius, Rousseau, Pestalozzi, Frobel, Dewey, Vygotsky, and Piaget, respectively, followedand developed each other's views on this subject. The naturalist approach involved in theclassical view within the philosophy of education; in other words, the use of real space ingeography education was the main field where authentic learning developed.Implications for Research and Practice: Given that authentic learning, which is not socommon in Turkey, is discussed in more studies and applications within the frame of this ideahas been considered crucial concerning the development of geography education.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, N., KARAKAS-OZUR, N. (2022). Philosophical Roots of Authentic Learning and Geography Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 90, 185–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/507100

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acikgoz, K.U. (2004). Aktif ogrenme [Active Learning]. Izmir: Egitim Dunyasi Yayinlari. Akpinar, B. (2004). Konusulan otantik bir dil kaynagi olarak televizyon reklamlarinin yabanci dil ogretiminde kullanilmasi [Using TV commercials in foreign language teaching as a spoken, authentic language source]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi Dergisi, 38, 198-211.
  2. Ari, Y. (2010). Cografyanin genel egitime katkisi [Geography's contribution to general education]. Icinde R. Ozey ve S. Incekara (Ed.), Cografya Egitiminde Kavram ve Degisimler[Concepts and changes in geography education] (s. 9-21). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Ata, B. & Bagci, İ. (2007). Egitim klasikleri incelemeleri [Education classics reviews]. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi Yayinlari. Bektas, M. & Horzum, B. (2010). Otantik ogrenme [Authentic learning]. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi Yayinlari. Capkova, D. (1970). The recommendations of Comenius regarding the education of young children. In C.H. Dubinson (Ed.), Commenius and Contemporary Education an International Symposium (pp. 9-17). Hamburg: Unesco Institute For Education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001319/131996eo.pdf
  6. Cevizci, A. (2018). Egitim felsefesi [Educational philosophy]. Istanbul: Say Yayinlari. Comenius, J.A. (1907). Great didactica. (Trans. M.W. Keatinge). London: Adam & Charles Black. Dewey, J. (2010a). Gunumuzde egitim [Education today] (Ed. Joseph Ratner). (Cev. Ed., B. Ata ve T. Ozturk). Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi Yayincilik. Dewey, J. (2010b). Okul ve toplum [School and society] (Cev. H.A. Basman). (2. Baski). Ankara:Pegem Akademi Yayincilik. Dilmac, O. ve Dilmac, S. (2014). Lise ogrencilerinin gorsel sanatlar dersinde otantik degerlendirme yaklasimlarina yonelik gorusleri: Nitel bir arastirma [Attitudes of authentic assessment approach of visual arts lesson in high school]. Usak Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(4), 275-298.
  8. Doganay, H. ve Doganay, S. (2014). Cografyaya giris [Introduction to geography]. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi Yayincilik. Erasmus, D. (1992). Delilige ovgu [The Praise of folly/Encomium moriae] (Cev. N. Hizir). Istanbul: Kabalci Yayinevi. Fosnot, C.T. (2007). Constructivizm olusturmacilik teori perspektif ve uygulama [Constructivism:Theory perspectives and practice] (Cev. S. Durmus). (2. Baski). Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik. French Dictionary. Authentic. Retrieved from http://www.fransizcasozluk.net/index.php?q=authentique
  10. Frobel, F.A. (1908). The education of man (Trans. W. N. Hailmann). Newyork: Appleton & Compa