Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Comparison of Turkish-English Bilinguals’ Processing of Emotion Words in Their Two Languages

Pages
89–98
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is a great deal of evidence showing that, in monolinguals, various emotional stimuli are processed by the brain in different ways.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Shorter response times and higher accuracy rates were found for real words compared to non-words in both languages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There is a great deal of evidence showing that, in monolinguals, various emotional stimuli are processed by the brain in different ways. This view has found considerable support from studies conducted with verbal stimuli. In bilinguals, on the other hand, emotional processing is more complex, and is thought to be influenced mainly by two factors; age of language acquisition and proficiency. In this study, participants were forty-eight simultaneous / early bilinguals, who acquired both languages from birth, and have high proficiency in both. A lexical decision task, i.e., distinguishing real words from non-words, was used to gain insight into to how the participants processed visually presented emotion words in Turkish and English. Reaction times and accuracy were recorded via SuperLab software program and were statistically analyzed. Shorter response times and higher accuracy rates were found for real words compared to non-words in both languages. Also, shorter response times were found for positive compared to negative and neutral words in both languages. An analysis of the accuracy rates revealed no statistically significant differences among Turkish emotion words, whereas, for English, accuracy rates were higher for positive words when compared to negative and neutral words. These results have been interpreted in the light of psycholinguistic models of lexical processing © 2017 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Cite This Article

MERGEN, F., KURUOGLU, G. (2022). A Comparison of Turkish-English Bilinguals’ Processing of Emotion Words in Their Two Languages. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 89–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/507060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Altarribba, J. (2006). Cognitive approaches to the study of emotion-laden and emotion words in monolingual and bilingual memory. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Bilingual Minds: Emotional Experience, Expression, and Representation (pp. 232-253)
  2. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ekonomi/docDetail.action? docID=10120617 &p00=bilingual%20minds Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2010). The representation of emotion vs. emotionladen words in English and Spanish in the Affective Simon Task. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15 (3), 310-328.
  3. Anooshian, L., & Hertel, P. (1994). Emotionality in free recall: language specificity in bilingual memory. Cognition and Emotion, 8 (6), 503-514.
  4. Bogacz, R., Wagenmakers, E. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neuroscience, 33 (1), 1-16.
  5. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words. instruction manual and affective ratings. Retrieved from: http://www.uvm.edu/ ~pd odds / files/papers/others/1999/bradley1999a.pdf. Brierley, B., Medford, N., Shaw, P., & David, A. S. (2007). Emotional memory for words: separating content and context. Cognition and Emotion, 21 (3), 495-521.
  6. Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs A. M. (2011). Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. PlosONE, 6 (8), 1-9.
  7. Chen, P., Lin, J., Chen, B., Lu, C., & Guo, T. (2015). Processing emotional words in two languages with one brain: ERP and fMRI evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. Cortex, 71, 34-48.
  8. Conrad, M., Recio, G., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing: a cross cultural ERP study with German-Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (351), 1-15.
  9. Dewaele, J. M. (2004a). The emotional force of swear words and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals. Journal of Multilingualism and Multicultural Development, 25 (2-3), 204- 222. Dewaele, J. M. (2004b). Blistering barnacles! What languages do multilinguals swear in?. Estudios de Sociolinguistica, 5 (1), 83 -105. Dewaele, J. M. (2008). The emotional weight of I love you in multilinguals’ languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (10), 1753-1780. Eilola T.M., & Havelka, J. (2011). Behavioural and physiological responses to the emotional and taboo Stroop tasks in native and non-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism,15 (3), 353-369.
  10. Eilola, T., Havelka, J