Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Strengths and Weaknesses of Primary School English Language Teaching Programs in Turkey: Issues Regarding Program Components

Pages
325–347
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, the ability to communicate in English is a need brought about by the globalization processencompassing developments in many fields such as science and technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To address this need, Englishlanguage teaching programs in Turkey (henceforth ELTP) underwent substantial changes within thelarger curriculum reform movements taking place in 1997, 2006 and 2013, the last of which is also calledthe 4+4+4 education system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, the ability to communicate in English is a need brought about by the globalization processencompassing developments in many fields such as science and technology. To address this need, Englishlanguage teaching programs in Turkey (henceforth ELTP) underwent substantial changes within thelarger curriculum reform movements taking place in 1997, 2006 and 2013, the last of which is also calledthe 4+4+4 education system. In these ELTPs, major differences were based on primary school Englishlanguage teaching and learning. However, there is a growing claim that these ELTPs did not achieve theintensions in equipping primary school students with the necessary communicative skills in English.Thus, this integrative literature review study aims to explore the results of the evaluation studies so asto understand the strengths and weaknesses of each ELTP regarding such program components as aimsand outcomes, content, materials, and testing and assessment. In line with this, studies conducted toevaluate the 1997, 2006 and 2013 ELTPs were examined thoroughly, and their findings were identifiedfor the analysis. The analysis of the studies showed that problems with the ELTPs under evaluationincluded not carefully written aims and outcomes failing to include all domains. It also reveals problemswith the selection and design of the content and materials which failed to be adequate and effective.Lastly, reliance on paper-based assessment even failing to include productive skills is seen to be anotherproblem. All these issues seem to be persistent over all the ELTPs, thus they call for carefulconsideration and action for the improvement of further program changes.© 2018 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

ERARSLAN, A. (2022). Strengths and Weaknesses of Primary School English Language Teaching Programs in Turkey: Issues Regarding Program Components. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 325–347. https://ajindex.com/articles/507030

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alkan, M. F., & Arslan, M. (2014). Evaluation of the 2nd Grade English Language Curriculum, Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Dergisi, 4 (7), 87-100.
  2. Alparslan, A. M. (2014). The Antecedent of Job Satisfaction from the University and ExtraRole Behavior: A Survey on Mehmet Akif Ersoy University. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (11), 82-101.
  3. Arı, A. (2014). Teacher Opinions about Evaluation of 6th Grade English Lesson Curriculum in Primary Schools. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 7 (2), 172-194.
  4. Arıbaş, S., & Tok, H. (2004). Evaluating the Problems Encountered in Foreign Language Instruction in the First Level of Elementary School. In XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı (pp. 6–9).
  5. Malatya. Aslan, Y. (2016). Comparison of Primary School Foreign Language Curricula of Turkey, Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(8), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i8.1581
  6. Aybek, B. (2015). An Evaluation of Primary Education Second Grade English Course Based Upon the Views of English Teachers. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume, 10 (15), 67–84.
  7. Bayraktar, B. (2014). Evaluation of the English Curriculum for Second Classes in Primary Schools according to Teachers’ Opinions. Uludağ Üniversitesi,
  8. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa. Bozavlı, E. (2015). Evaluation of Foreign Language Teaching in 2nd Year of Primary School according to Teachers’ Opinions. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (2), 74-83.
  9. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27-40.
  10. Brown, J. (1995). The elements of language curriculum A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  11. Bulut, İ., & Atabey, E. (2016). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the primary school 2nd grade English language curriculum in practice. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.17679/INUEFD.17366404
  12. Büge, B. C. (2005). An Examination of the Comparison of Turkey’s Primary School English Curriculum and Finland’s Foreign Language Curriculum (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institution, Ankara.
  13. Büyükduman, F. İ. (2005). The Opinions’ of Elementary Schools English Teachers on the English Curriculum for Elementary Schools. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 55-64. Cihan,T. & Gürlen, E. (20