Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Can Exams Change How and What Teachers Teach? Investigating the Washback Effect of a University English Language Proficiency Test in the Turkish Context

Pages
155–176
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that both positive and negative test effects were exerted on teaching.In addition to positive washback on materials, this study also found negative washback in the form ofnarrowing of the curriculum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article reports a mixed-method study that examined the washback effect from a locally-produced,theme-based, high-stakes English language proficiency test in tertiary education in a Turkish EAP context.The aim was to explore the extent to which washback on teaching was induced by an integrated theme-basedEnglish proficiency test designed to reflect authentic language use in the tertiary education context inTurkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data collection involved classroom observations and focus group interviews with 14 instructorsfrom the Preparatory English Language Program (PEP).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that both positive and negative test effects were exerted on teaching.In addition to positive washback on materials, this study also found negative washback in the form ofnarrowing of the curriculum.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article reports a mixed-method study that examined the washback effect from a locally-produced,theme-based, high-stakes English language proficiency test in tertiary education in a Turkish EAP context.The aim was to explore the extent to which washback on teaching was induced by an integrated theme-basedEnglish proficiency test designed to reflect authentic language use in the tertiary education context inTurkey. The data collection involved classroom observations and focus group interviews with 14 instructorsfrom the Preparatory English Language Program (PEP). Classroom observations were conducted using theCommunicative Orientation of Language Teaching Observation Scheme (COLT) (Spada & Frohlich, 1995),and data was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. Inductive analysis of the transcribed interview datawas also used. The findings indicated that both positive and negative test effects were exerted on teaching.In addition to positive washback on materials, this study also found negative washback in the form ofnarrowing of the curriculum. Findings also implied that although the test had varying amounts and types ofwashback depending on the particular teacher involved, both content and methodology in teaching areaffected. The article concludes by interpreting these results in the light of recent studies on learnerwashback, discussing implications for teachers, and providing suggestions for further research.© 2018 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-access articledistributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

SAGLAM, A. L. G. (2022). Can Exams Change How and What Teachers Teach? Investigating the Washback Effect of a University English Language Proficiency Test in the Turkish Context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 155–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/507029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akpinar, K.D. & Cakildere, B. (2013). Washback effects of high-stakes language tests of Turkey (KPDS and UDS) on productive and receptive skills of academic personnel. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 81-94.
  2. Alderson, C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280-297.
  3. Alderson, C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115-129.
  4. Azadi, G. & Gholami, R. (2013). Feedback on washback of EFL tests on ELT in L2 classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1335-1341.
  5. Bailey, K.M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257-279.
  6. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Burrows, C. (2004). Wash-back in classroom-based assessment: A study of the washback effect in the Australian adult migrant English program. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research Contexts and methods (pp. 147-170).
  7. Manwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chen, L.M. (2002). Washback of a public exam on English teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472167). Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.
  8. Cheng, L. (2004). The washback effect of a public examination changes of teachers’ perceptions toward their classroom teaching. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research Contexts and methods (pp. 147-170).
  9. Manwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research Contexts and methods (pp. 3-18).
  11. Manwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Clark, C.M. and Peterson, P.L. (1986), Teachers' Thought Processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Eds.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan. Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation test to teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research Contexts and methods (pp