Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Reflections of Incoming Erasmus+ Exchange Students at a Turkish University Context

Pages
323–339
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to shed light on the preferences and problems of Erasmus+ exchange programmestudents before and during the mobility process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study were 21 incoming Erasmus+ studentshaving studied at a state university in Turkey at 2015-2016 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to shed light on the preferences and problems of Erasmus+ exchange programmestudents before and during the mobility process. The research was organized in qualitative researchmethod phenomenological design. The participants of the study were 21 incoming Erasmus+ studentshaving studied at a state university in Turkey at 2015-2016 academic year. The required data werecollected with a survey in open-ended questionnaire format. The collected data were analyzed withdescriptive content analysis technique. Students’ answers were described, organized and explained tointerpret the context. Participants’ preferences gave information about the reasons for choosing thecountry and the university while their impressions were covering the first impressions after arriving inTurkey, information about Turkey, Turkish culture, Turkish university, and expectations abouteducation. The findings also gave information about the problems or difficulties and previous experiencesof the participants. Lastly, some implications and suggestions were derived from the statements ofErasmus+ programme students.© 2019 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜN, S., ŞENER, S. (2022). Reflections of Incoming Erasmus+ Exchange Students at a Turkish University Context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 323–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/507009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abu Jalalah, F. (1993). The cultural dimension of teaching English as a foreign language in an Arab Gulf state. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Durham. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.) Contemporary Field Research, Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown. CoHE, Turkish Council of Higher Education (2000). The Law on Higher Education. Retrieved on August 10, 2018 from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/30217/the_law_on_higher_education_mart_2000.pd f/bb86b67f-2aea-4773-8c21-43c10384f883 CoHE, Turkish Council of Higher Education (2018). Bologna Process. Retrieved on September 01, 2018 from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/uluslararasi-iliskiler/bologna-sureci
  2. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London and New York: Routledge Falmer. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage European Commission (2016). Erasmus+ EU programme for education, training, youth and sport. Retrieved on October 16, 2016 from http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmusplus/about_en
  3. Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality. On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 237–59.
  4. House, J. (1999). Misunderstanding in intercultural communication: Interactions in English as lingua franca and the myth of mutual intelligibility. In Teaching and Learning English as a Global Language, C. Gnutz-mann (ed.), 73 –89. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. İçbay, M. A., & Kocayörük, E. (2011). Being an exchange student in Turkey: Adaptation to a new culture. International Journal of Progressive Education, 7(3), 27-39.
  5. Jackson, J. (2011). Host language proficiency, intercultural sensitivity, and study abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 21, 167-188.
  6. Konevas, L., & Duoba K. (2007). The role of student mobility in the development of human capital in Europe, Economics and Management, 12, 585-591.
  7. Lipowski, M. (2012). Experience of Erasmus students studying in Poland. In Knowledge and Learning: Global Empowerment; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2012 (pp. 751-758). International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (Second Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., M