Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Directed motivational currents: An agenda for future research

Pages
501–519
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For eachfuture avenue that we propose, we foreground several more specific directions in which research effortmight begin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Directed motivational currents (DMCs) encapsulate a unique motivational phenomenon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:DMCs arehighly positive, potent motivational experiences which can carry individuals or groups forwards toachieving valued goals at both a remarkable rate, and with a perceived feeling of seemingly ‘effortlesseffort’.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For eachfuture avenue that we propose, we foreground several more specific directions in which research effortmight begin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Directed motivational currents (DMCs) encapsulate a unique motivational phenomenon. DMCs arehighly positive, potent motivational experiences which can carry individuals or groups forwards toachieving valued goals at both a remarkable rate, and with a perceived feeling of seemingly ‘effortlesseffort’. Although research into DMCs began under a decade ago (Dörnyei, Ibrahim & Muir, 2015;Dörnyei, Muir & Ibrahim, 2014; Henry, Davydenko & Dörnyei, 2015; Muir & Dörnyei, 2013), themotivational experience DMCs encapsulate is, in and of itself, certainly not novel. DMCs appear to bewidely recognizable in diverse contexts, and may even be relatively widely experienced (Muir, 2020). Thetheoretical underpinning of DMC theory draws together findings from a broad range of well-establishedmotivational disciplines in related areas of psychology (including cognitive and educational psychology),alongside motivation research rooted more fully in the context of language learning (LLing) and teaching.We begin by overviewing the DMC construct itself, outlining key cornerstones and primary theoreticalprinciples that underpin our understanding of each. We go on to lay out a broad agenda for further study,continuing the discussion in the final chapter of Muir (2020), by foregrounding six avenues for futureresearch. Viewed together, they are demonstrative of the scope of future research potential surroundingDMC theory, incorporating both theoretical and applied (pedagogic) directions for inquiry. For eachfuture avenue that we propose, we foreground several more specific directions in which research effortmight begin.

🔖

Cite This Article

Muir, C., Gümüş, Ö. (2022). Directed motivational currents: An agenda for future research. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 501–519. https://ajindex.com/articles/506984

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Badstübner, T., & Ecke, P. (2009). Student expectations, motivations, target language use, and perceived learning progress in a summer study abroad program in Germany. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756- 1221.2009.00034.x Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
  2. Başöz, T., & Erten, İ. H. (2018). Investigating tertiary level EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. English Language Teaching, 11(3), 78–87. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n3p78
  3. Başöz, T., & Erten, İ. H. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into the factors influencing EFL learners’ in-class willingness to communicate in English. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(1), 1–18.
  4. Baumann, N. (2012). Autotelic personality. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (165–186). New York: Springer. Beckett, G. H., & Chamness Miller, P. (Eds.) (2006). Project-based Second and Foreign Language Education: Past, Present and Future. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Beckett, G. H. & Slater, T. (Eds.) (2020). Global Perspectives on Project-based Language Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: Key Approaches, Technology Tools, and Frameworks. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO personality inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Churchill, E. & DuFon, M. A. (2006). Evolving threads in study abroad research. In M. A. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (1–27).
  5. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975/2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Csizér, K. (2019). The L2 motivational self system. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (71–93). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and Education: Enquiries into Learning, Teaching and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–91. ht