SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Exploring motivational strategies in higher education: Student and instructor perceptions

Zeynep Erdil Moody
Amy S. Thompson
Pages
387–413
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Descriptive statistics, independentsamples t-tests, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to analyze the data (N= 454).Results indicated that instructors frequently used a variety of motivation-enhancing strategies; groupcomparisons of perceptions and EFA results via the three latent variables raised some important issues;independent samples t-tests indicated a statistically significant group difference for the strategies in Factor3, those related to the ideal L2 self, while showing no difference for the other two factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study offers cross-cultural validity of motivational strategies, as well as reliability and validitymeasures of an adapted questionnaire in a new context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Foreign/second language (L2) learning motivationhas long been demonstrated to have a substantial impact on second language acquisition; L2 teachers playa major role in learner motivation with their use of motivational strategies in classes (Dörnyei, 2001;Dörnyei & Kubanyiova, 2014).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Descriptive statistics, independentsamples t-tests, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to analyze the data (N= 454).Results indicated that instructors frequently used a variety of motivation-enhancing strategies; groupcomparisons of perceptions and EFA results via the three latent variables raised some important issues;independent samples t-tests indicated a statistically significant group difference for the strategies in Factor3, those related to the ideal L2 self, while showing no difference for the other two factors.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study offers cross-cultural validity of motivational strategies, as well as reliability and validitymeasures of an adapted questionnaire in a new context. Foreign/second language (L2) learning motivationhas long been demonstrated to have a substantial impact on second language acquisition; L2 teachers playa major role in learner motivation with their use of motivational strategies in classes (Dörnyei, 2001;Dörnyei & Kubanyiova, 2014). Motivational strategies vary in their effectiveness and appropriateness indifferent EFL contexts (e.g., Dörnyei, 2001; Guilloteaux & Dörnyei, 2008). There is little research, however,in combining the theory and practice in motivation research; in other words, there are few studies thatexamine motivational strategy research in conjunction with the L2 Motivational Self System (L2MSS). Tofill this gap, the current study examined college EFL instructors’ motivational teaching practices, informedby the ideal L2 self guide in Turkey, from both instructors and students’ perspectives. Quantitative datawere collected via a motivational strategies questionnaire that was created and validated specifically forthis study – Teachers’ Use of Motivational Strategies Scale (TUMSS). Descriptive statistics, independentsamples t-tests, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to analyze the data (N= 454).Results indicated that instructors frequently used a variety of motivation-enhancing strategies; groupcomparisons of perceptions and EFA results via the three latent variables raised some important issues;independent samples t-tests indicated a statistically significant group difference for the strategies in Factor3, those related to the ideal L2 self, while showing no difference for the other two factors. Pedagogicalimplementations are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Moody, Z. E., Thompson, A. S. (2022). Exploring motivational strategies in higher education: Student and instructor perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 387–413. https://ajindex.com/articles/506980

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Alrabai, F. (2016). The effects of teachers' in-class motivational intervention on learners' EFL achievement. Applied Linguistics 37(3), 307-333. doi:10.1093/applin/amu021. Arnold, J., Puchta, H., & Rinvolucri, M. (2007). Imagine that! Mental imagery in the EFL classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Begić, I., & Mercer, S. (2017). Looking back, looking forward, living in the moment: Understanding the individual temporal perspectives of secondary school EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1317261
  2. Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00753.x. Busse, V., & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2) 435–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12004.x Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174. doi: 10.2167/illt048.0. Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98-119).
  3. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147- 168. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428103251541
  4. Deci, E., L., & Ryan, R., M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivation strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, New jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Creating a motivating classroom environment. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 719-731).
  6. Springer, Boston, MA. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-