Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Non-lınear elastıc response of clay soıls under cyclıc loadıngs

Tekrarlı yük etkisinde kil zeminlerin lineer olmayan elastik davranışı

Pages
169–185
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, a correlation for field conditions is also presented by using in situ shear wave velocities between laboratory and in-situ shear modulus and damping ratio values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Response of soil deposits under dynamic loadings differs with the cyclic loading amplitudes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Normally consolidated specimens were cyclically loaded under different stress amplitudes at a frequency of 0.1 Hz.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, a correlation for field conditions is also presented by using in situ shear wave velocities between laboratory and in-situ shear modulus and damping ratio values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Response of soil deposits under dynamic loadings differs with the cyclic loading amplitudes. In this study, stress controlled cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on the specimens taken from the Istanbul Avcilar District. Normally consolidated specimens were cyclically loaded under different stress amplitudes at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. Maximum shear modulus and damping ratio values determined. Loading cycles showed that the non-linear elastic shear modulus is approximately equal to 90% of shear modulus ratio. After this threshold it’s observed that the material response under cyclic loading is greatly influenced from plasticity index of the soil. From the test results empirical relationships proposed for determining the maximum shear modulus for practical purposes. Furthermore, a correlation for field conditions is also presented by using in situ shear wave velocities between laboratory and in-situ shear modulus and damping ratio values.

Özet

Zemin tabakaların dinamik yükler altındaki davranısı, tekrarlı yükleme genliğine bağlı olarak farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu çalısmada, Đstanbul Avcılar Bölgesinden alınan örselenmemis kil zemin numuneler üzerinde, gerilme kontrollü dinamik üç eksenli deneyler yapılmıstır. Normal konsolide olarak hazırlanan numuneler 0,1 Hz frekansında, farklı tekrarlı gerilme genliklerinde yüklenmistir. Yükleme sonucu maksimum kayma modülü, sönüm oranı değerleri belirlenmistir. Lineer olmayan elastik davranıs sınırı kayma modülü oranının yaklasık % 90 değerine denk gelmektedir. Bu sınır asıldıktan sonra malzemenin tekrarlı yük altında davranısı, özellikle plastisite indisinden büyük oranda etkilenmektedir. Deney sonuçlarından, maksimum kayma modülünü belirlemeye yönelik pratik amaçlar için kullanılabilecek bağıntılar önerilmistir. Ayrıca arazi deneylerinden elde edilen kayma dalgası hızından yola çıkarak laboratuar ve arazi kayma modülü ve sönüm oranı arasındaki iliski belirlenmistir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUR, V., ANSAL, A. (2022). Non-lınear elastıc response of clay soıls under cyclıc loadıngs. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 169–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/505813

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. K. Ishihara, “Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics”, Clarendon Press, 1996, Oxford
  2. B.O. Hardin, W.L. Black, “Vibration Modulus of Normally Consolidated Clay, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations”, ASCE, Vol. 94, pp. 353-369, 1968
  3. T. Kagawa, “Moduli and damping factors of soft marine clays”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, pp. 1360-1375, 1992
  4. W.F. Marcuson, H.E. Wahls, “Time Effects on Dynamic Shear Modulus of Clays”, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations, ASCE, Vol. 98, pp. 1359-1379, 1972
  5. K. Zen, Y. Umehara, K. Hamada, “Laboratory tests and in-situ seismic survey on vibration shear modulus of clayey soils with various plasticities”, Proceedings of the 5th Japanase Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Japan, pp. 721-728, June 1978
  6. T. Kokusho, Y. Yoshida, Y. Esashi, “Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range, Soils and Foundations”, Vol. 22, pp. 1-18, 1982
  7. A.M. Ansal, H. Yıldırım, “Killerin tekrarlı yükler altında kayma mukavemeti”, II. Ulusal Kil Sempozyomu, Haccettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, 24-27 Eylül 1985, s. 329-341
  8. G. Viggiani, J.H. Atkinson, "Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains”, Geotechnique, Vol. 45, pp. 249-265, 1995
  9. H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, “Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses”, College of Engineering, University of California Technical Report, EERC 70-10, Berkeley, California, 1970
  10. F. Tatsuoka, S. Shibuya, “Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests”, Proceedings of the 9th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics, Bangkok, 9-13 December, Thailand pp.101-170, 1992
  11. M. Jamiolkowski, R. Lancellotta, D.C.F. Presti, “Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Sapparo, 12-14 September, Japan, pp. 135- 144, 1994
  12. D.W. Hight, V.N. Georgiannou, “Effects of sampling on the undrained behavior of clayey sands”, Geotechnique, Vol. 45, pp. 237-247, 1995
  13. S. Guha, V.P. Drenevich, J.D. Bray, “Dynamic characteristics of Old Bay Clay”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 20, pp. 383-393, 1997
  14. R.W. Cunny, Z.B. Fry, “Vibratory in-situ and laboratory soil moduli compared”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, pp. 1022-1076, 1973
  15. J.D. Bray, M.E. Riemer, W.B. Gookin, “On the dynamic characterization of soils”, Pro