Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1-2

THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS

Pages
143–157
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

İnsan Hakları Hukuku altında korunmasına yönelik endişeleri ne dereceye kadar giderebildiğini analiz edecektir

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 2008 and it came into force on 5 May 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although, an optional protocol regula- ting the complaint procedure for its sister treaty, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, was entered into force in 1976, it was postpo- ned for ICESCR until 2013 because of the historic debate discussing whether these rights are justiciable or not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:İnsan Hakları Hukuku altında korunmasına yönelik endişeleri ne dereceye kadar giderebildiğini analiz edecektir
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 2008 and it came into force on 5 May 2013. The protocol gives individuals the right to raise complaints about violations of their rights which are enshrined by the covenant. Although, an optional protocol regula- ting the complaint procedure for its sister treaty, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, was entered into force in 1976, it was postpo- ned for ICESCR until 2013 because of the historic debate discussing whether these rights are justiciable or not. This division between the treaties left the protection of the ESCR in the background. This essay will analyse the extent to which the protocol resolved the historical concerns about the protection of economic, social and cultural rights under international human rights law. İnsan Hakları Hukuku altında korunmasına yönelik endişeleri ne dereceye kadar giderebildiğini analiz edecektir

Özet

Uluslararası Ekonomik Sosyal Kültürel Haklar Sözleşmesi'ne (ESKHS), 10 Aralık 2008'de, Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurulu tarafından, isteğe bağlı bir protokol kabul edildi ve 5 Mayıs 2013'te yürürlüğe girdi. Protokol, birey- lere, ilgili sözleşmede yer alan haklarının ihlal edildiğine dair iddialarını bireysel başvuru yolu ile şikayet etme hakkı getirmektedir. Şikayet prosedü- rünü düzenleyen bir isteğe bağlı protokolün, ESKHS'nin ikiz sözleşmesi ola- rak adlandırılan Uluslararası Medeni ve Siyasal Haklar Sözleşmesi için 1976'da yürürlüğe girmiş olmasına rağmen, ESKHS için benzer bir protokol, bu hakların mahkemeye taşınabilirliği üzerine yapılan tarihi tartışmadan dolayı 2013'e kadar ertelendi ve ikiz sözleşmeler arasındaki bu farklılık ESKHS'ni koruma mekanizması bakımından geri planda bıraktı. Bu makale isteğe bağlı protokolün, ekonomik, sosyal kültürel hakların Uluslararası

🔖

Cite This Article

CEBECİOĞLU, A. (2022). THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS. Erzincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1-2, 143–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/505499

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Ahmed T, ' Semminar 5 of International Human Rights Module' 2013,
  2. University of Reading. 'Background Information on the ICESCR' (ESCR-Net (International Network for Economic, Social & Cultural Rights) ) _____http://www.escr- net.org/docs/i/425251> accessed 01.02.2014. CESCR General Comment No. 9, The Domestic Application of the Covenant, (Nineteenth Session, 1998), U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1998/24 (1998). Coomans F, 'The Ogoni Case before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights' [2003] International and Comparative Law Quartely, pp. 749-760. 'Definitions and Classifications: First, Second and Third Generations Rights' (Icelandic Human Rights Centre ) _____http://www.humanrights.is/the-human-rights pro- ject/humanrightscasesandmaterials/humanrightsconceptsideasandfora/thecon ceptsofhumanrightsanintroduction/definitionsandclassifications/> accessed 27.01.2014. Kaime T, 'Whose Rights are They Anyway? A Critical Analysis of the International Supervision Mechanisms for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights' (ZAMLII ) _____http://www.unza.zm/zamlii/comment/zlj/v3706.html> accessed 02.02.2014 Karan U, 'Sosyal Hakların Güçlendirilmesi Açısından Bir İmkan: 'Bütüncül Yaklaşım'( An Opporunity for Strenghtening Social Rights)' [2007] Amme İdaresi Dergisi, s.31-62. 'Key Concepts on ESCRs - What are the Obligations of States on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?' (United Nations Human Rights 2012) _____http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/ESCR/Pages/WhataretheobligationsofStat esonESCR.aspx> accessed 29.01.2014. Langford M, 'An Introduction to the Optional Protocol to the Inter- national Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights' [2009] Nordic Journal of Human Rights, pp. 1-28. Mahon C, 'Progress at the Front: The Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights' [2008] Human Rights Law Review, 617. Nolan A, Porter B, Langford M, 'The Justiciability of the Econo- mic, Social and Cultural Rights: An Updated Appraisal' [2007] CHRGJ Working Paper 1. Odello M & Seatzu F, The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1st, Routledge, USA 2013) 5. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,(2008). Rubin S, 'Economic and Social Human Rights and the New Interna- tional Economic Order' [1986] American University International Law Re- view, pp. 67-96. Stanton S, 'Human Rights Abuses in Nigeria: "Ogoni 9" Trial against Shell to Begin April 27 in New York' (Centrre for Ec