Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Farm Operations Cooperative in Central Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria

Türkiye’de Tarımsal Yayım Sisteminde Çoğulcu Yapının Bir Görünümü

Pages
249–255
Publication Date
2015-12-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The groups with bloated membership strength should be split into two groups while farmers need to be encouraged to subscribe to those groups with inadequate membership strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to examine farm operations cooperatives in Central Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All the members of the six (6) selected groups were used for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The groups with bloated membership strength should be split into two groups while farmers need to be encouraged to subscribe to those groups with inadequate membership strength.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to examine farm operations cooperatives in Central Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. All the members of the six (6) selected groups were used for the study. The data which were collected with the use of questionnaire and interview schedule were analyzed with the use of frequency counts, percentages and tobit regression model. Most of the members were females and were also mostly married. Most of them were educated formally and had average household size of 5 persons and average farm size of 2.5 ha. They had an average farming experience of 13 years and most of them had no contact with extension agents. Most (76.50%) household had members that emigrated from households. They subscribed to these groups because of reduction of labour cost, timely execution and conclusion of farm operations, exchange of ideas and information, expansion of farm size and reduction of drudgery involved in farming. They were mostly satisfied with their various groups. They however had challenges ranging from irregular meeting attendance, inadequate access to extension service, bloated membership strength to lateness to work. Inadequate membership strength was also a constraint to few of the groups. The farmers’ decision to subscribe to their various groups was informed or influenced by their marital status, level of education, household size, farm size, farming experience, extension visit and contact with other farmers, and emigration of household members. It was recommended that extension agents should establish frequent contacts with the various groups and educate them on the importance of time and regular meeting attendance. The groups with bloated membership strength should be split into two groups while farmers need to be encouraged to subscribe to those groups with inadequate membership strength.

Özet

-

🔖

Cite This Article

KANMAZ, E. Ö., OVA, G. (2015). Farm Operations Cooperative in Central Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 249–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/50418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Agbamu, J.U. (2011). Problems and prospects of agricultural extension in developing countries. In: Madukwe, M. C. (Ed). Agricultural extension in Nigeria. Ilorin, Nigeria: Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria. pp 216-229.
  2. Ahmad, A. and Ismail, N. (1998). Gender roles Malaysian agriculture: Implications for extension planning. Journal of International Agriculture and Extension Education.2(1),17-25.
  3. Chang, H. and Boisvert, R. (2005). Are farmers’ decision to work off the farm and participate in the Conservation Reserve Program independent, joint or sequential? Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Providence. FAO (2006). Improving extension work with rural women. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Iwala, O. S., Okwulola, J.O. and Imoudu, P.B. (2006). Productivity and technical efficiency of oil palm production in Nigeria. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2 (3 and 4), 181 – 185. Ofuoku, A. U.(2013). Willingness of farmers to participate in farmers’ groups. Journal of Extension Systems, 29(1), 51-61.
  4. Ofuoku, A. U., Uzokwe, U. N. and Ideh, V. (2006). Comparative analysis of cooperative and non-cooperative fish farmers in Central Agro-ecological Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. Extension Farming Systems Journal, 2(2), 97- 101. Ofuoku, A.U. (2009). Rural farmers’ perception of climate change in Central Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science, 12(2), 63-69.
  5. Ofuoku, A.U. and Agbamu, J. U. (2013).Leadership and self-help groups in Nigeria- Implications for agricultural extension. Journal of Extension Systems, 29(1), 65-75.
  6. Ofuoku, A.U. and Chukwuji, C.O. (2012). Impact of rural – urban migration on plantation agriculture in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27 (1), 137 – 151. Ofuoku, A.U. and Urange, E. (2012). Effect of cohesion on loan repayment in farmers’ cooperative societies in Delta State, Nigeria. Ofuoku, A.U; Enaikele, M., and Nnodim, A.U. (2008). Cohesiveness of fish farmers’ cooperative Societies in Southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 3(4), 16 – 21. Ogionwo, W. and Eke, P. (1999). An introduction to socio-psychology. Owrri, Nigeria: Springfield Publishers.
  7. Oladele, O. I. (2005). A tobit analysis of the propensity to discontinue adoption of agricultural technologies among farmers in South Western Nigeria. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(3), 6(3), 249-254. Pan