Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Current approaches of canine hip dysplasia. part ıı: clinical diagnosis of cannine hip dysplasia

Köpeklerde Kalça Displazisine güncel yaklaşımlar. Bölüm ıı: Kalça Displazisinin klinik tanı yöntemleri

Pages
35–42
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The objective of the second part of this review is to share the findings of inspection and palpation that are frequently used of clinical diagnostic methods with our colleagues.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hip dysplasia (HD) is a progressive disease which develops during postnatal skeletal growth and arises with a number of factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A definitive diagnosis can be made by radiography when secondary signs of degenerative joint disease (DJD) are present.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The objective of the second part of this review is to share the findings of inspection and palpation that are frequently used of clinical diagnostic methods with our colleagues.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hip dysplasia (HD) is a progressive disease which develops during postnatal skeletal growth and arises with a number of factors. A definitive diagnosis can be made by radiography when secondary signs of degenerative joint disease (DJD) are present. However, it is essential to prevent DJD by early diagnosis, and to apply proper treatment to avoid the progression of HD. The important point of early diagnosis is to determine the laxity, joint morphology, and congruity of hip joint by clinical signs and radiography. When HD is diagnosed, the patient should be followed up for the characteristic changes of hip joint. The objective of the second part of this review is to share the findings of inspection and palpation that are frequently used of clinical diagnostic methods with our colleagues.

Özet

Kalça Displazisi (KD), köpeklerde postnatal iskelet gelisimi periyodunda birçok faktörün etkisiyle olusan progresif bir hastalıktır. KD’nin kesin teshisi dejeneratif eklem hastalıgının sekonder belirtileri ortaya çıktıgında radyolojik olarak yapılabilmektedir. Ancak KD’nde esas olan hastalıgın önüne geçmek yani erken teshis ederek artritik bir eklem olusumuna izin vermeden sagaltım asamasına geçmektir. Erken teshiste önemli olan ise, klinik ve radyolojik bulgular esliginde koksofemoral eklemin morfolojisinin, uyumlulugunun ve eklemdeki gevsekligin belirlenmesidir. Hastalık ile birlikte eklemde görülen karakteristik degisimlerin degisik metotlarla kontrolü gerekmektedir. Derlemenin bu ikinci bölümünde, klinik tanı yöntemleri arasında erken teshis amacıyla sıkça kullanılan inspeksiyon ve palpasyon bulgularını meslektaslarımızla paylasmak amaçlanmıstır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAPTUĞ, Ö., BİLGİLİ, H. (2022). Current approaches of canine hip dysplasia. part ıı: clinical diagnosis of cannine hip dysplasia. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 35–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/504067

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adams WM, Dueland TR, Meinen J, O’Brien RT, Giuliano E, Nordheim EV, 1998. Early detection of canine hip dysplasia: comparison of two palpation and five radiographic methods. JAAHA, 34(5): 339-346
  2. Amy SK, Mayhew DP, Smith GK, 2002. Canine hip dysplasia: the disease and its diagnosis. Compend Cont Ed., 24(9): 681-687
  3. Bilgili H, 2003. Köpeklerde gelisimsel kalça ve dirsek displazisi kursu ve workshop’u. 23-25 Mayıs 2003, Ankara, 7-19
  4. Cardinet GH, Kass PH, Wallace LJ, Guffy MM, 1997. Association between pelvic muscle mass and canine hip dysplasia. JAVMA, 210 (10): 1466-1473
  5. Charette B, Dupuis J, Beuregard G, 2001. Palpation and dorsal acetabular rim radiographic view for early detection of canine hip dysplasia. VCOT, 14, 125-132
  6. Dueland RT, Adams W, Patricelli AJ, 2006. “Saving” the young dog’s hip. 2nd World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress. 25th February-4th March 2006, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 91-93
  7. Farese JP, Lust G, Williams AJ, 1999. Comparison of measurements of dorsolateral subluxation of the femoral head and maximal passive laxity for evaluation of the coxofemoral joint in dogs. Am J Vet Res, 60 (12): 1571-1576
  8. Fries CL, Remedios AM, 1995. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia: review. Can Vet J, 36(8): 494-502
  9. Ginja MMD, Ferreira AJA, Silvestre AM, Gonzale-Orden JM, Llorens-Pena MP, 2006. Hip joint fluid and passive laxity in puppies at 7 or 8 weeks of age and its correlation with late hip laxity and canine hip dysplasia. 13th ESVOT Congress. September, 7-10, Munich, Germany, 232-233
  10. Ginja MMD, Gonzale-Orden JM, Silvestre AM, Llorens-Pena MP, 2006. The reliability of early screeing for canine hip dysplasia using the passive hip laxity score. 13th ESVOT Congress. September, 7-10, Munich, Germany, 234-235
  11. Gülanber EG, 2004. PennHip Radyografi Kursu Notları. 22 Agustos 2004, Istanbul, 1-20
  12. Hazewinkel HAW, 2001. Diagnosis and treatment of skeletal problems in the dog. Large Breed Health Care Symposium. April, 13, Venice, Italy, 29-33
  13. Jacek JH, Beale BS, Parker RB, 1993. Diagnosis and treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Canine Practice, (18): 28-33
  14. Lust G, Todhunter RJ, 2003. Hip Dysplasia: Pathogenesis. Slatter, D, ed. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, 3rd ed., Philedelphia, W.B. Saunders, pp.2009-2019
  15. Özsoy S, 2002. Köpeklerde kalça displazisinin tanısı: klinik degerlendirmeler ve radyolojik tanısı. Vet Cer Derg, 8(3-4): 81-95
  16. Puerto DA, Smith GK, Gregor TP, 1999. Rela