Journals / European Journal of General Medicine / 2011 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Güneydoğu Brezilya’da özel bir populasyonda melanoma dışı cilt kanserlerinin tanı ve tedavisi ve bunun önleme alışkanlıklarına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of the diagnosis and treatment of Non-melanoma skin cancer and its impacts on the prevention habits in a specific population of southeastern Brazil

Pages
291–301
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall diagnostic accuracy was 76.19%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common cancer in humans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Twenty-five patients that underwent 42 resections of skin lesions clinically diagnosed as NMSC were assessed in relation to factors that are specific to these lesions (evolution time, size and histological type), surgical treatment, postoperative follow-up (relapses and/or new lesions), knowledge and previous use of prevention methods and impact of the diagnosis and treatment on the prevention habits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall diagnostic accuracy was 76.19%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common cancer in humans. Diagnosis is clinical and treatment is based on complete surgical excision and histopathologic confirmation. Perceptions of risk and preventive behavior after treatment are relatively unknown. This study was aimed at evaluating the accuracy of NMSC diagnosis compared with anatomopathological, and the effectiveness of surgical treatment and NMSC prevention methods in a specific population. Method: Twenty-five patients that underwent 42 resections of skin lesions clinically diagnosed as NMSC were assessed in relation to factors that are specific to these lesions (evolution time, size and histological type), surgical treatment, postoperative follow-up (relapses and/or new lesions), knowledge and previous use of prevention methods and impact of the diagnosis and treatment on the prevention habits. Result: All patients had a history of unprotected sun exposure. Most lesions were observed on fair-skinned individuals (classes I to III according to Fitzpatrick). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 76.19%. There were ten new lesions and only one case of relapse during follow-up. Only eight patients reported sporadic use of preventive methods after the clinical diagnosis and treatment of injuries. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy was considered satisfactory. Surgical treatment with pre-determined safety margins was effective in most cases. Diagnosis and surgical treatment have not determined a positive impact on the adoption of preventive measures.

Özet

Amaç: Melanom dışı cilt kanserleri (MDCK) insanlarda görülen en sık kanser türüdür. Tanı klinik olarak konulur ve tedavide temel tam cerrahi eksizyon ve histopatolojik doğrulamadır. Tedaviden sonraki risk algısı ve önleme davranışı nispeten iyi bilinmemektedir. Bu çalışmada özel bir populasyonda anatomopatolojik ile mukayese edildiğinde MDCK tanısının doğruluğunun ve MDCK önleme metodları ve cerrahi tedavi etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Metod: Klinik olarak NMSC olarak tanı konulan 42 deri lezyonu rezeksiyonu yapılan 25 hasta lezyonlara (değerlendirme zamanı, boyutu ve histolojik tipi) spesifik olan faktörler, cerrahi tedavisi, postop izlem (relaps ve yeni lezyonlar), bilgi ve daha önce koruyucu önlemlerin kullanılması ve önleyici davranışlarında tedavi ve tanının etkisi ile ilişkisi değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Tanısal doğruluğun tatmin edici olduğu düşünüldü. Vakaların büyük çoğunluğunda daha önceden güvenlik marjinleri tayin edilerek yapılan cerrahi tedavi etkindi. Tanı ve cerrahi tedavi önleyici tedbirlerin alınmasında pozitif bir etkiye sahip değildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

PIGOZZI, R. D. S., SOUTO, L. R. M. (2022). Güneydoğu Brezilya’da özel bir populasyonda melanoma dışı cilt kanserlerinin tanı ve tedavisi ve bunun önleme alışkanlıklarına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. European Journal of General Medicine, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 291–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/503730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Madan V, Lear JT, Szeimies RM. Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet 2010
  2. 375(9715):673-85 2. Aceituno-Madera P, Buendía-Eisman A, Arias-Santiago S, Serrano-Ortega S. Changes in the incidence of skin cancer between 1978 and 2002. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2010
  3. 101(1):39-46 3. de Vries E, van de Poll-Franse LV, Louwman WJ, de Gruijl FR, Coebergh JW. Predictions of skin cancer incidence in the Netherlands up to 2015. Br J Dermatol 2005
  4. 152(3):481-8 4. Diepgen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2002
  5. 146 (Suppl 61):1-6 5. Trakatelli M, Ulrich C, del Marmol V, Euvrard S, Stockfleth E, Abeni D. Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in Europe: accurate and comparable data are needed for effective public health monitoring and interventions. Br J Dermatol 2007
  6. 156 (Suppl 3):1-7 6. Young C. Solar ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Occup Med (Lond) 2009
  7. 59(2):82-8 7. Mogensen M, Jemec GB. Diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer/keratinocyte carcinoma: a review of diagnostic accuracy of nonmelanoma skin cancer diagnostic tests and technologies. Dermatol Surg 2007
  8. 33(10):1158-74 8. Telfer NR, Colver GB, Morton CA
  9. British Association of Dermatologists. Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2008
  10. 159(1):35-48 9. French Society of Dermatology. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2009
  11. 136 Suppl 5:S166-86 10. Rhee JS, Davis-Malesevich M, Logan BR, Neuburg M, Burzynski M, Nattinger AB. Behavior modification and risk perception in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer. WMJ 2008
  12. 107(2):62-8 11. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sunreactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988
  13. 124(6):869-71 12. Ministry of Health of Brazil. Estimate/2010 - Incidence of Cancer in Brazil. (Instituto Nacional do Câncer web site). 2009. Available at: http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/ 2010/. Accessed October 13, 2010 13. Ministry of Planning of Brazil. Brazilian Cities. Demographics of the cities. (Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Fundação IBGE) web site). 2010. Available at: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/ topwindow.htm?1. Accessed October 13, 2010 14. Brazilian Society of Dermatology. (Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) web site). 2010. Available at: http:// www.sbd.org.br/campanha/cancer/ultravioleta.aspx. Accessed October 13, 2010 15. Kütting B, Drexler H. UV-induced skin cancer at workpl