SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Use of propofol alone or in combination with alfentanil in probe curettage

Probe küretajda tek başına propofol veya propofol / alfentanil kombinasyonu

Gülen GÜLER
Halit MADENOĞLU
Günhan GÖKAHMETOĞLU
Hediye VELİBAŞIOĞLU
Adem BOYACI
Pages
180–184
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We conclude that P used alone provided haemodynamic stability, sedation, analgesia and rapid recovery without the combination of opioids in probe curettage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare the haemodynamic, sedative and analgesic effects of propofol (P) alone or in combination with alfentanil (A) during probe curettage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 42 women patients, American Society for Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II, scheduled for probe curettage were randomly divided into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We conclude that P used alone provided haemodynamic stability, sedation, analgesia and rapid recovery without the combination of opioids in probe curettage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare the haemodynamic, sedative and analgesic effects of propofol (P) alone or in combination with alfentanil (A) during probe curettage. Material and Methods: A total of 42 women patients, American Society for Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II, scheduled for probe curettage were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in Group I were given 1.5 mg/kg P, Group II: 1.5 mg/kg P, 10 pg/kg A. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBF), heart rate (HR), peripheral O2 saturation (SpU2), were recorded before induction, during and after operation. Results: No statistically significant differences were seen between the SBP and DBF measurements of the groups before induction and during operation (p>0.05), however, SBP and DBF were significantly lower after operation in the P+A group (p0.05). Duration of apne and recovery were shorter in Group I than Group II. Conclusion: We conclude that P used alone provided haemodynamic stability, sedation, analgesia and rapid recovery without the combination of opioids in probe curettage.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, probe küretajda tek başına uygulanan propofol (P) ile propofol+alfentanil (P+A) kombinasyonunu hemodinamik stabilité, sédatif ve analjezik etkileri açısından karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Probe küretaj uygulanacak American Society for Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II grubundan 42 kadın hasta rasgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Grup I hastalara 1.5 mg/kg P, Grup II hastalara ise 1.5 mg/kg P +10 fj.g/ kg alfentanil (A) kombinasyonu uygulandı. Tüm hastaların başlangıç, işlem sırası ve sonrasında sistolik arter basıncı (SAB), diyastolik arter basıncı (DAB), kalp atım hızı (KAH) ve periferik oksijen saturasyonu (SpO2 ) değerleri ile apne ve derlenme süreleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Her iki grupta da indüksiyon öncesi ve operasyon esnasında SAB ve DAB değerleri benzer seyrederken (p>0.05), operasyon sonrasında P+A grubunda anlamlı olarak düşük bulundu (p0.05). Apne ve derlenme süreleri P grubunda P+A grubuna göre daha kısa bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, G., MADENOĞLU, H., GÖKAHMETOĞLU, G., VELİBAŞIOĞLU, H., BOYACI, A. (2022). Use of propofol alone or in combination with alfentanil in probe curettage. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 180–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/502899

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Jakob s son J, Oddby E, Rane K: Patient evaluation of four different combinations of intravenous anaesthetics for short outpatient procedures. Anesthesia 1993;48:1005-1007
  2. Bryson HM, Fulton BR, Faulds D: Propofol An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Drugs 1995: 50: 513-559, 3 Reader J, Gupta A, Peder son FM: Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane or propofol based anaesthesia for day-care surgery. Acta Anaesth Scand 1997;41:988-991
  3. Korttila K, Östman PL, Faure E, et al: Randomized comparison of recovery after propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopentone- isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Âcta Anaesth Scand 1990; 34:400-403
  4. Me Collum JSC, Milligan KR, Dundee JW: The antiemetic effect of propofol. Anaesthesia 1988; 43:239-240
  5. Doze VA, Shafer A, White PF: Propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopental-isoflurane-nitrous oxide for general anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1988:69;63-71
  6. Price ML: Comparison of total intravenous anaesthetic technique using propofol infusion with an inhalation technique using enflurane for day surgery. Anaesthesia 1988;43:84-87
  7. Borgeat A, Wilder S, Saiah M, Kaplan R: Subhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties. Anesth Analg 1992;74:539-541
  8. Watcha MF, White PF: Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment and prevention. Anesthesiology 1992;77:162-184
  9. Campbell NN, Thomas AD. Does propofol have an anti-emetic effect ? A postoperative study of the anti-emetic effect of propofol following laparoscopy. Anaesth Intens Care 1991; 19:385-387
  10. Marshall CA, Jones RM, Bajorek PK, Cashman JN: Recovery characteristics using isoflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia: a double-blind controlled trial. Anaesthesia 1992;47:461-463
  11. Raftery S, Sherry E. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil protects against postoperative nausea and vomiting. Can J Anaesth 1992;39:37-40
  12. Borgeat A, Wilder-smith OHG, Suter PM: The nonhypnotic therapeutic applications of propofol. Anesthesiology 1994;80:642-645
  13. Jakobsson J, Davidson S, Westgreen A: Opioid supplementation to propofol anaesthesia for outpatient abortion: a comparison between alfentanil, fentanyl and plasebo. Acta Anaesth Scand 1991;35:767-770.