SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Ischemic stroke: Impairment and disability

İskemik inme: Nörolojik kayıp ve özürlülük

Melek ÖZARSLAN
Ali SOYUER
Ferhan SOYUER
Pages
19–24
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Stroke-related impairment and disability are significantly correlated with each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To describe the association between impairment and disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Totaly 100 patients with ischemic stroke were assessed at Erciyes University Hospital Department of Neurology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Stroke-related impairment and disability are significantly correlated with each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To describe the association between impairment and disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Method: Totaly 100 patients with ischemic stroke were assessed at Erciyes University Hospital Department of Neurology. The Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) was used to measure impairment and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was used to measure disability. The assessments were made at 7-10 days and 3 months during poststroke period. Results: RMA correlated significantly with FIM at 7-10 days and 3 months. Conclusion: Stroke-related impairment and disability are significantly correlated with each other.

Özet

Amaç: İskemik inmeli olgularda nörolojik kayıp ve özürlülük arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamakMetod: Erciyes Üniversitesi Nöroloji Anabilim Dalı'nda yatmakta olan toplam 100 akut iskemik inmeli olgu değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Nörolojik motor kaybı değerlendirmek için Rivermead motor değerlendirmesi (RMA), özürlülüğü değerlendirmek içinde Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeği (FİM) kullanılmıştır. Değerlendirmeler stroke sonrası 7-10 günlerde ve 3.ay da yapılmıştır. Bulgular: RMA, FİM ile hem ilk hemde 3.aydaki değerlendirmelerde anlamlı bir ilişki çıkmıştır.Sonuç: İnme ile ilişkili nörolojik kayıp ve özürlülük önemli oranda birbiri ile ilişkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZARSLAN, M., SOYUER, A., SOYUER, F. (2022). Ischemic stroke: Impairment and disability. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 19–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/502845

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Lehmann JF, deLateur BJ, Fowler RS, Warren CG, Arnhold R, Schertzer G. Stroke rehabilitation: outcome and prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1975; 56: 383-9
  2. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 5-8
  3. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history, and prognosis. J Neurol Neusurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-182
  4. Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990; 21: 247-251
  5. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1992; 23: 978-982
  6. Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Disability outcomes foolowing inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 494-503
  7. Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1994. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75: 125-129
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps (ICDIDH). Geneva: WHO; 1980
  9. Lind K. A synthesis of studies on stroke rehabilitation. J Chronic Dis 1982; 35: 133- 149
  10. Dobkin BH. Focused stroke rehabilitation programs do not improve outcomes. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 701-703
  11. WHO Special Report. Stroke 1989: recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407- 1431
  12. Lincoln NB, Leadbitter D. Assessment of Motor Function in Stroke Patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48-51
  13. Adams SA. The rivermead motor assessment. (In) Marilyn A. Harrison (Ed) Physiotherapy in stroke management. Churchill Livingstone, 1995; 125-133
  14. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielenzy M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In Fuhrer MJ, Ed. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore (MD): Brooks Publishing Company, 1987; 137-147
  15. Doods TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measure and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 531-536
  16. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 115-119
  17. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Measurement characteristics of the functional independence measure. Top Stroke Rehabil 1994; 1: 1-15
  18. Linacre JW, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger C, Hamilton