Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5

Morphometry of coracoid process

Processus coracoideus morfometrisi

Pages
387–392
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients presenting with complaints of shoulder pain, anatomical variations of the coracoid process , should be considered important in planning surgical interventions to the relavant area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose:In this study, because of the relationship with the subcoracoid impingement syndrome, various morphometric measurements of the coracoid process were calculated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods:A total of 80 dry scapulae with unknown sex and age were obtained from the Department of Anatomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients presenting with complaints of shoulder pain, anatomical variations of the coracoid process , should be considered important in planning surgical interventions to the relavant area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose:In this study, because of the relationship with the subcoracoid impingement syndrome, various morphometric measurements of the coracoid process were calculated. Material and Methods:A total of 80 dry scapulae with unknown sex and age were obtained from the Department of Anatomy. Scapulae were classified into 3 groups according to shape of the region between the coracoid process and glenoidal cavity.Various measurements were calculated. Results:» was observed that, the percentapes of Type I spherical in shape was 37.5%, Type II square in shape was 32.5% and Type III was hooked in shape was 30%. Statistical analysis evaluations showed correlations between the length and thickness of the coracoid process (r =0.432, p< 0.05). In comparison of the right and left scapulae, the length of the coracoid process was observed to be longer on the right scapula than the left, and this difference was statistically significant (t =2.111, p< 0.05). Conclusion: In present study, it was observed that the morphometry of the coracoid process of the scapulae might show prominent differences. In patients presenting with complaints of shoulder pain, anatomical variations of the coracoid process , should be considered important in planning surgical interventions to the relavant area.

Özet

Amaç:Bu çalışmada subcoracoid impingement sendromundaki rolünden dolayı, processus coracoideus'la ilgili morfometrik ölçümler ve değerlendirmeler yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya Anatomi Laboratuarları'nda bulunan, yaşı ve cinsiyeti belirsiz, toplam 80 adet scapula dahil edildi.Scapula'lar processus coracoideus ve cavitas glenoidalis arası bölgenin şekline göre üç gruba ayrıldı. Her tipe ait, processus coracoideus uzunluğu, kalınlığı, processus coracoideus ve cavitas glenoidalis üst kenarı arası mesafe, processus coracoideus'un cavitas glenoidalis'ten geçirilen düzlemin lateralinde kalan parçasının uzunluğu ölçülerek kaydedildi. Bulgular:Tip I olarak adlandırılan yuvarlak şekilli grup % 37,5 oranmda, tip II olarak adlandırılan kare şekilli grup % 32,5 oranmda ve tip III olarak adlandırılan çengel şekilli grup % 30 oranmda gözlendi.Yapılan istatistiki değerlendirmede, processus coracoideus uzunluğu ve kalınhğı arasında pozitif korelasyon olduğu görüldü (r = 0,432, p < 0,05 ). Sag ve sol scapulalar karşılaştırıldığında ise, processus coracoideus uzunluğu sag scapula'larda istatistiksel olarak anlamh düzeyde daha uzun bulundu ( t = 2,111, p < 0,05). Sonuç:Çahşmamızdan elde ettiğimiz bulgular göstermektedir ki scapulalann processus coracoideus morfometrileri belirgin şekilde farklılık gösterebilmektedir. Bu yüzden omuz ağrısı şikayetiyle başvuran hastalarda etiyolojide processus coracoideus'a ait anatomik varyasyonlarm göz önünde bulundurulması ve bu bölgeye yapılacak cerrahi girişimlerin buna göre planlanması önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİMEN, M., KOŞAR, M. İ., SABANCIOĞULLARI, V., ERDİL, H. F., KALKAN, K., AYCAN, K. (2022). Morphometry of coracoid process. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5, 387–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/502740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Gerber C, Terrier F, Ganz R. The role of the coracoid process in the chronic impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985; 67(5): 703-8
  2. Radas CB, Pieper HG. The coracoid impingement of the subscapularis tendon: a cadaver study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(2): 154-9
  3. Patte D. The subcoracoid impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (254): 55-9
  4. Sperner G. Die Bedeutung des Subakromialraums für die Entstehung des Impingementsyndroms. Teil I. Unfallchirurg. 1995; 98(6): 301-8
  5. Gumina S, Postacchini F, Orsina L, Cinotti G. The morphometry of the coracoid process - its aetiologic role in subcoracoid impingement syndrome. Int Orthop. 1999; 23(4): 198-201
  6. Dines DM, Warren RF, Inglis AE, Pavlov H. The coracoid impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(2): 314-6
  7. Von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ. Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 383: 131-9
  8. Gerber C, Terrier F, Zehnder R, Ganz R. The subcoracoid space. An anatomic study. Clin Orthop 1987; 215: 132-8
  9. Richards DP, Burkhart SS, Campbell SE. Relation between narrowed coracohumeral distance and subscapularis tears. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(10): 1223-8.