Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Foramen magnumun bilgisayarlı tomografi ile morfometrik olarak değerlendirilmesi

Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum by computed tomography

Pages
167–170
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The cases having any cranial deformity or structural disorder which could be affect the Foramen Magnum's measurements were not included.Results: It was found significant positive correlations (r= 0.63; p< 0.05) between the transverse diameter and anteroposterior diameter of the Foramen Magnum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Since great vital important neuroanatomical structures passing through the foramen magnum, morphometric evaluations are so important especially to establish the most proper operational techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to clarify and establish exact anatomical definition of interested area by documented morphometric analysis which was evaluated by computed tomography (CT).Material and Methods: A fifty-four (29 female, 25 male) cranial CT scans obtained from the archives of Department of Radiology were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The cases having any cranial deformity or structural disorder which could be affect the Foramen Magnum's measurements were not included.Results: It was found significant positive correlations (r= 0.63; p< 0.05) between the transverse diameter and anteroposterior diameter of the Foramen Magnum.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Since great vital important neuroanatomical structures passing through the foramen magnum, morphometric evaluations are so important especially to establish the most proper operational techniques. The purpose of this study was to clarify and establish exact anatomical definition of interested area by documented morphometric analysis which was evaluated by computed tomography (CT).Material and Methods: A fifty-four (29 female, 25 male) cranial CT scans obtained from the archives of Department of Radiology were evaluated. The age group who completed of the skull bony maturation was included. The cases having any cranial deformity or structural disorder which could be affect the Foramen Magnum's measurements were not included.Results: It was found significant positive correlations (r= 0.63; p< 0.05) between the transverse diameter and anteroposterior diameter of the Foramen Magnum. There was a significant difference between the anteroposterior diameter of male and female cases (p

Özet

Amaç: Hayati önem taşıyan nöroanatomik yapılar Foramen Magnum'dan geçtiğinden, özellikle morfometrik değerlendirmeler en uygun operasyon tekniğinin seçiminde çok önemlidir. Kranial bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri üzerinde yapılan ölçümler ile Foramen Magnum anatomisine açıklık getirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda radyoloji bölümü arşivinden elde edilen, 54 vakaya ait (29 kadın, 25 erkek) kranial bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri değerlendirildi. Vakalar, kafatası kemikleşme matürasyonunu tamamlamış yaş gruplarını içerdi. Foramen magnum ölçümlerini etkileyebilecek kranial deformitesi veya kemik yapısında bozukluk olanlar değerlendirmeye alınmadı.Bulgular: Foramen Magnum ölçümlerinde, transvers çap ile antero-posterior çap (opisthion- basion arası mesafe) arasında anlamlı pozitif ilişki vardı (r=0,63; p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİMEN, M., IŞIK, O., ERDİL, F. H., SABANCIOĞLU, V. (2022). Foramen magnumun bilgisayarlı tomografi ile morfometrik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 167–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/502575

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Williams PL, Warwick R. Gray's Anatomy. Xnd edition. New York: Churchil Livingstone; 1989. p.342-361
  2. Moore KL. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 2nd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1985. p.801-814
  3. Romanes G.J. Cunningham's Text Book of Anatomy. 12 th Ed., Oxford University Pres, Oxford. 1981; 113-114
  4. Çalgüner E. Foramen magnumun anatomik varyasyonları ve morfometrik değerlendirmesi. Gazi Tıp Dergisi 1991; 2:25-30
  5. Sindel M, Özkan O, Uçar Y, Demir S. Foramen Magnum'un Anatomik Varyasyonları. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 1989; 44: 97-102
  6. Lang J, Schafhauser O, Hoffmann S. Postnatal development of transbasal skull openings: carotid canal, jugular foramen, hypoglossal canal, condylar canal and foramen magnum (German). Anat Anz. 1983;153(4): 315-357
  7. Bozbuğa M, Öztürk A, Bayraktar B, Arı Z, Şahinoğlu K et al. Surgical Anatomy and Morphometric Analysis of the Occipital condyles and Foramen Magnum. Okijamas Folia Anat Jpn. 1999; 75: 329-334
  8. Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten- year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg 1988; 69: 895-903
  9. Martin R, Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anhtroplogie. Band I. Stutgart: Gustov Fisher Verlag, 1957. p. 455-509
  10. Snell RS. Clinical Anatomy for Medical Student. 4th edition. Boston; Little, Brown and Company: 1992. p. 808-812
  11. Coin CG, Malkasian DR. Foramen magnum. In Newton TH. Potts DG, editors. Radiology of the Skull and Brain.: The Skull. Vol 1, book 1 St. Louis: Mosby; 1971. p. 275-286. 12) de Oliveira E, Rhoton AL Jr, Peace D. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the foramen magnum. Surg Neurol. 1985; 24:293-352
  12. Iwata A, Murata M, Nukina N, Kanazawa I. Foramen Magnum Syndrome Caused by Atlanto-occipital Assimilation. J Neurol Sci. 1998; 154: 229-231
  13. Friede RL, Roessmann U. Chronic tonsillar herniation: an attempt at classifying chronic herniations at the foramen magnum. Acta Neuropathol 1976; 34: 219-235
  14. George B, Lot G, Boissonnet H. Meningioma of the Foramen Magnum: a series of 40 cases. Surg Neurol. 1997; 47: 371-379
  15. Ünal F, Kırış T, İzgi N, Önal Ç, Tükel T. Mukopolisakkaridozların nöroşirürjikal komplikasyonları. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 1998; 61:1
  16. Shapiro R, Robinson F. Anomalies of the craniovertebral border. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976; 127:281-287
  17. Sendemir E, Savci G, Cimen A. Evaluation of the foramen magnum dimensions. Kaibogaku Zasshi 1994; 69:50-52. 19)