Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Bilateral total diz protezi sonrasında gelişen brusella melitensis kaynaklı septik gevşeme ve iki aşamalı total diz protezi revizyonu

Septic loosening due to brucella melitensis after bilateral knee prosthesis and two-stage total knee prosthesis revision

Pages
97–99
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the 24-month follow-up period,no complications were seen.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Infection after total knee replacement is a serious complication associated with a high incidence of morbidity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A prostheticinfection due to Brucella melitensis is a very rare condition.In this study, we describe a case of brucellosis infection withseptic loosening of both knee joints after bilaterally cementedtotal knee prosthesis application; this is rarely encountered inthe literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the 24-month follow-up period,no complications were seen.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Infection after total knee replacement is a serious complication associated with a high incidence of morbidity. A prostheticinfection due to Brucella melitensis is a very rare condition.In this study, we describe a case of brucellosis infection withseptic loosening of both knee joints after bilaterally cementedtotal knee prosthesis application; this is rarely encountered inthe literature. The patient diagnosis was established by clinicalfindings (fever, joint swelling, etc.) and supported by laboratoryfindings and analysis of joint fluid obtained from joint aspiration. Plain radiography and bone scintigraphy confirmed septicloosening. In this case, we performed total knee prosthesis revision bilaterally after antibiotic treatment. We preferred two-stagesurgery for the revision. In the first stage, the infected prosthesiswas removed and a Teicoplanin-loaded bone cement spacerwas inserted in both knees. Twenty weeks later, the secondstage was performed. During the 24-month follow-up period,no complications were seen.

Özet

Total diz protezi sonrası görülen enfeksiyon ciddi bir komplikasyon olup, yüksek bir morbiditeye sahiptir. Brucella melitensis’in sebep olduğu prostetik eklem enfeksiyonu oldukça nadirdir. Buçalışmada bilateral çimentolu total diz protezi uygulanmasından sonra literatürde nadir olarak görülen her iki diz ekleminde septik gevşemeyle ortaya çıkan brusella enfeksiyonu olgusu ta-nımlanmıştır. Olgunun tanısı ateş, eklem şişliği gibi klinik bul-guların yanısıra, eklem aspirasyonu sonucu elde edilen eklem sıvısının incelenmesi ve labaratuvar bulgularıyla desteklenmiştir. Olguda hem direkt radyografiler, hem de kemik sintigrafileri septik gevşemeyi doğrulamıştır. Bu olguda antibiyotik tedavisini takiben her iki diz için revizyon total diz protezi uygulanmıştır. Revizyon için iki aşamalı cerrahi tercih edilmiştir. Birinci aşamada enfekte protezin çıkarılmasından sonra Teikoplanin içeren sement spacer yerleştirilmiş, ikinci aşama ise yirmi hafta sonrauygulanmıştır. Ameliyat sonrası 24 aya ulaşan takiplerinde herhangi bir komplikasyon görülmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAFADAR, İ., ÖNER, M., HALICI, M., GÜNEY, A. (2022). Bilateral total diz protezi sonrasında gelişen brusella melitensis kaynaklı septik gevşeme ve iki aşamalı total diz protezi revizyonu. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 97–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/502485

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Garvin KL, Hanssen AD. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77(10): 1576-88
  2. Hanssen AD, Rand JA. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 1999; 48(1): 111-22
  3. Agarwal S, Kadhi SK, Rooney RJ. Brucellosis complicating bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 6(267): 179-81
  4. Kasim RA, Araj GF Afeiche NE, Tabbarah ZA. Brucella infection in total hip replacement: case report and review of the literature. Scand J Infect Dis 2004; 36(1): 65-7. [CrossRef] 5. Ortí A, Roig P Alcalá R, Navarro V Salavert M, Martín C, et al. Brucellar prosthetic arthritis in a total knee replacement. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997; 16(11): 843-5. [CrossRef] 6. Cairó M, Calbo E, Gómez L, Matamala A, Asunción J, Cuchi E, et al. Foreign-body osteoarticular infection by Brucella melitensis: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(1): 202-4. [CrossRef] 7. Weil Y, Mattan Y, Liebergall M, Rahav G. Brucella prosthetic joint infection: a report of 3 cases and a review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(7): 81-6. [CrossRef] 8. Young EJ. An overview of human brusellosis. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21(2): 283-9. [CrossRef] 9. Mousa AR, Muhtaseb SA, Almudallal DS, Khodeir SM, Marafie AA. Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis: a study of 169 cases. Rev Infect Dis 1987; 9(3): 531-43. [CrossRef] 10. Yorgancigil H, Yayli G, Oyar O. Neglected case of osteoarticular Bru- cella infection of the knee. Croat Med J 2003; 44(6): 761-3
  5. Ariza J, Pujol M, Valverde J, Nolla JM, Rufí G, Viladrich PF et al. Brucellar sacroiliitis: findings in 63 episodes and current relevance. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16(6): 761-5. [CrossRef] 12. González-Gay MA, García-Porrúa C, Ibañez D, García-País MJ. Os- teoarticular complications of brucellosis in an Atlantic area of Spain. J Rheumatol 1999; 26(1): 141-5
  6. Khateeb MI, Araj GF Majeed SA, Lulu AR. Brucella arthritis: a study of 96 cases in Kuwait. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49(12): 994-8. [CrossRef] 14. Zaks N, Sukenik S, Alkan M, Flusser D, Neumann L, Buskila D. Musculo- skeletal manifestations of brucellosis: a study of 90 cases in Israel. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1995; 25(2): 97-102. [CrossRef] 15. Steckelberg JO. Prosthethic joint infections. In: Waldvogel FA, Bisno AL, editors. Infections associated with indwelling medical devices.1st ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2000.