Jinekomastide bilgisayarlı tomografi ile yağ dokusu ölçümü

Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ratio of gynecomastic adipose tissue (GAT) to total gynecomastic tissue (TGT) with computerized tomography (CT) and determine its benefits for selection of surgical technique in gynecomastia.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Prospectively; 20 young patients with gynecomastia who were treated between 2006 and 2009 years were included in the study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Thedifference between all surgical protocols was statistically significant (p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2006 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ratio of gynecomastic adipose tissue (GAT) to total gynecomastic tissue (TGT) with computerized tomography (CT) and determine its benefits for selection of surgical technique in gynecomastia. Material and Methods: Prospectively; 20 young patients with gynecomastia who were treated between 2006 and 2009 years were included in the study. Patients’ mean age was 22 years (19-28). Nine patients were treated with subcutaneous mastectomy (13 breasts) and 7 patients (13 breasts) were treated with suction assisted lipectomy (SAL). Four patients (7 breasts) were operated with subcutaneous mastectomy and SAL. An experienced radiologist used standard software to determine the ratio of gynecomastic adipose tissue (GAT) to total gynecomastic tissue (TGT) in all patients. Results: The mean GAT/TGT ratio was 0.7 (0.6-0.9) in patients treated with SAL and 0.2 (0.1-0.3) treated with subcutaneous mastectomy. The mean GAT/TGT ratio in patients treated with SAL combined with subcutaneous mastectomy was 0.4 (0.3- 0.5). Thedifference between all surgical protocols was statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada; bilgisayarlı tomografi ile ölçülen jinekomastik yağ dokusu ve toplam jinekomastik doku oranının ameliyat yöntemi seçiminde faydalı olup olmadığı araştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 2006-2009 yılları arasında jinekomasti nedeniyle tedavi edilen 20 genç hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 22 (19-28 yıl) idi. Hastaların 9’u (13 meme) mastektomi, 7’si (13 meme) yağ emme yöntemi ile tedavi edildi. Dört hasta (7 meme) yağ emme yöntemi ve subkutan mastektomi ile tedavi edildi. Radyoloji uzmanı tarafından jinekomastik dokudaki yağ oranının toplam jinekomastik dokuya oranı hesaplandı. Bulgular: Yağ emme yönteminin yeterli olduğu hastalarda jinekomastik dokudaki yağ oranının toplam jinekomastik dokuya oranı 0,7 (0,6-0,9), mastektomili hastarda 0,2 (0,1-0,3), kombine tedavi gerektiren hastalarda 0,4 (0,3-0,5) olarak bulundu. Farklı cerrahi protokoler uygulan hastalardaki hesaplanan oranlar istatiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklı bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİL, Y., BABAYİĞİT, M. A., YAPICI, A. K., AKTAŞ, G., ÖZTÜRK, S. (2022). Jinekomastide bilgisayarlı tomografi ile yağ dokusu ölçümü. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 15–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/502480

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM. A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56: 237-46. [CrossRef] 2. Letterman G, Schurter M. Surgical correction of massive gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 49: 259-62. [CrossRef] 3. Brenner P, Berger A, Schneider W, Axmann HD. Male reduction mammoplasty in serious gynecomastias. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1992; 16: 325-30. [CrossRef] 4. Illouz YG. Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 591-7. [CrossRef] 5. Babovic S, Bite U, Karnes PS, Babovic-Vuksanovic D. Liposuction: a less invasive surgical method of debulking plexiform neurofibromas. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 785-7. [CrossRef] 6. Dhami LD, Agarwal M. Safe total corporal contouring with large-volume liposuction for the obese patient. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30: 574-88. [CrossRef] 7. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51: 48-52. [CrossRef] 8. Weits T, van der Beek EJ, Wedel M, Ter Haar Romeny BM. Computed tomography measurement of abdominal fat deposition in relation to anthropometry. Int J Obesity 1988; 12: 217-25. 9. Nuttall FQ. Gynecomastia as a physical finding in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979; 48: 338-40. [CrossRef] 10. Mathur R, Braunstein GD. Gynecomastia: pathomechanisms and treatment strategies. Horm Res 1997; 48: 95-102. [CrossRef] 11. Hands LJ, Greenall MJ. Gynecomastia. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 907-11. [CrossRef] 12. Bjorntorp P. Abdominal fat distribition and the metabolic syndrome. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992; 20: 26-8. [CrossRef] 13. Rossner S, Bo WJ, Hiltbrandt E, Hinson W, Karstaedt N, Santago P, et al. Adipose tissue determinations in cadavers- a comparison between cross-sectional planimetry and computed tomography. Int J Obesity 1990; 14: 893-902. 14. Wray RC, Hoopes JE, Davis GM. Correction of extreme gynecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 1974; 27: 39-41. [CrossRef] 15. Davidson BA. Concentric circle operation for massive gynecomastia to excise the redundant skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 350-4. [CrossRef] 16. Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, Marangi GF, Di Lella F, Nobili AM. Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 948-54. [CrossRef] 17. Huang TT, Hidalgo JE, Lewis SR. Acircumareolar approach in surgical management of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 35-40. [Cro