SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

LASIK cerrahisinde flep kalınlığını etkileyen parametrelerin değerlendirilmesi

The evaluation of the parameters affecting flap thickness in LASIK surgery

Hatice ARDA
Kuddusi ERKILIÇ
Pages
123–127
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the possible effects of the first and second usage of the same microkeratome were also evaluated in cases with bilateral LASIK surgery.Results: The mean FT was found to be lower in the study group(t=21.35 and t=18.78, P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the factors affecting flap thickness (FT)in LASIK surgery using the MK-2000 microkeratome.Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty-nine eyes of82 cases with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who underwent LASIK surgery were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The MK-2000 microkeratome was used in all cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the possible effects of the first and second usage of the same microkeratome were also evaluated in cases with bilateral LASIK surgery.Results: The mean FT was found to be lower in the study group(t=21.35 and t=18.78, P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the factors affecting flap thickness (FT)in LASIK surgery using the MK-2000 microkeratome.Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty-nine eyes of82 cases with myopia and/or myopic astigmatism who underwent LASIK surgery were included. The MK-2000 microkeratome was used in all cases. The patients were divided into twogroups according to microkeratome heads (Group 1: 130 μm,Group 2: 160 μm). The actual FT was calculated by subtracting the pachymetric thickness of the central corneas before and after lifting the flap. The impact of age, preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), and refractive and keratometric values on FT was determined. In addition, the possible effects of the first and second usage of the same microkeratome were also evaluated in cases with bilateral LASIK surgery.Results: The mean FT was found to be lower in the study group(t=21.35 and t=18.78, P

Özet

Amaç: MK-2000 mikrokeratom kullanılarak yapılan LASIK cerrahisinde flep kalınlığını etkileyen parametreleri değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: LASIK cerrahisi uygulanmış, miyopik ve/ veya miyopik astigmatizması olan 82 olgunun 159 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm olgularda MK-2000 mikrokeratom kullanıldı. Olgular kullanılan mikrokeratom başlığına göre 2 gruba ayrıldı (1. Grup: 130 μm, 2. Grup: 160 μm). Gerçek flep kalınlığı, flep kaldırılmadan önceki ve sonraki pakimetrik santral kormeal kalınlıkların çıkarılması ile hesaplandı. Yaş, ameliyat öncesi santral korneal kalınlık (SKK), refraktif ve keratometrik değerlerin flep kalınlığına etkisi değerlendirildi. Ayrıcabilateral LASIK cerrahisi uygulanan olgularda aynı mikrokeratomun birinci ve ikinci kez uygulanmasının da flep kalınlığınaolası etkileri araştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama flep kalınlığı çalışma grubunda beklenenden (1. Grup: 130 μm, 2. Grup: 160 μm) düşük bulundu(t-değerleri= 21,35 ve 18,78; P

🔖

Cite This Article

ARDA, H., ERKILIÇ, K. (2022). LASIK cerrahisinde flep kalınlığını etkileyen parametrelerin değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 123–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/502400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS sur- vey. J Refract Surg 2003; 19(3): 357-63
  2. Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2003 ISRS/AAO survey. J Refract Surg 2005; 21(1): 87-91
  3. Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2004 ISRS/AAO survey. J Refract Surg 2005; 21(6): 742-8
  4. Pietila J, Huhtala A, Makinen P Seppanen M, Jaaskelainen M, Uusitalo H. Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 microkeratome and Med- Logics calibrated LASIK blades. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87(7): 754-8
  5. Steinert RF Bafna S. Surgical correction of moderate myopia: which method should you choose? II. PRK and LASIK are the treatments of choice. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 43(2): 157-79
  6. Paschalis EI, Aristeidou AP Foudoulakis NC, Razis LA. Corneal flap assessment with Rondo microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249(2): 289-95
  7. Pietilä J, Mäkinen P Suominen S, Huhtala A, Uusitalo H. Corneal flap measurements in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 auto- mated microkeratome. J Refract Surg 2005; 21(4): 377-85
  8. Pietilä J, Mäkinen P Suominen S, Huhtala A, Uusitalo H. Bilateral com- parison of corneal flap dimensions with the Moria M2 reusable head and single-use head microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 2006; 22(4): 354-7
  9. Flanagan GW, Binder PS. Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes. J Refract Surg 2003; 19(2): 113-23
  10. Probst LE, Machat JJ. Mathematics of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24(2): 190-5
  11. Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 1998; 14(3): 312-7
  12. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis NI. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27(11): 1796-802
  13. Genth U, Mrochen M, Wälti R, Salaheldine MM, Seiler T. Optical low coherence reflectometry for noncontact measurements of flap thickness during laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2002; 109(5): 973-8
  14. Gimbel HV, Penno EE, van Westenbrugge JA, Ferensowicz M, Furlong MT. Incidence and management of intraoperative and early postoperative complications in 1000 consecutive laser in situ keratomileusis cases. Ophthalmology 1998; 105(10): 1839-47
  15. Arbelaez MC. Nidek MK 2000 microkeratome clinical evaluation. J Refract Surg 2002; 18(3 Suppl): 357-60
  16. Schultze RL. Microkeratome update.