Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

Cancer in Ottoman Surgical Books – Part I: Classical Period (1450–1730)

Pages
513–518
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although it is seen that Ottoman Jarrāh-nāmes in the classical period dealt with the cancer within the scopeof medical practices in the Islamic civilization in the medieval times and almost all of the works examined in this study weretranslations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cancer is a disease known since prehistoric times; and both Western and Eastern medical literature have manyworks contain its causes and treatment during the ancient and medieval times.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to introduce cancerand its treatment in Ottoman jarrāh-nāmes in the classical period (1450–1730) and to make a contribution to literature ofTurkish history of medicine by determining the place of this information.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although it is seen that Ottoman Jarrāh-nāmes in the classical period dealt with the cancer within the scopeof medical practices in the Islamic civilization in the medieval times and almost all of the works examined in this study weretranslations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Cancer is a disease known since prehistoric times; and both Western and Eastern medical literature have manyworks contain its causes and treatment during the ancient and medieval times. The aim of this study is to introduce cancerand its treatment in Ottoman jarrāh-nāmes in the classical period (1450–1730) and to make a contribution to literature ofTurkish history of medicine by determining the place of this information. Materials and Methods: Surgeon Masʿūd’s Tarjamat al-Khulāṣa fī Fenn al-Jirāḥa, Sharaf al-dīn Ṣabunjıoghlı’s Jarrāhiyyatal-Khāniyya, Jarrāh-nāme of unknown author and Surgeon İbrāhīm’s ʿAlāʾim-i Jarrāḥīn were examined. However, after thecomparison, ʿAlāʾim-i Jarrāḥīn and Jarrāhiyyat al-Khāniyya were excluded from this study. A brief information was givenfirstly about the work and its author, and then the sections regarding cancer were presented in the Results section. Theinformation on cancer in these works evaluated in the light of the relevant literature and period in the Discussion section. Results: Surgeon Masʿūd’s Khulāṣa contains chapters about cancers on the head, trunk, breast and heel and their treat ments. Jarrāh-nāme of unknown author comprises a section in which the treatment of cancer is generally mentioned withoutspecifying the place of occurrence. Conclusion: Although it is seen that Ottoman Jarrāh-nāmes in the classical period dealt with the cancer within the scopeof medical practices in the Islamic civilization in the medieval times and almost all of the works examined in this study weretranslations.

🔖

Cite This Article

BELEN, D., ACIDUMAN, A., ER, U. (2022). Cancer in Ottoman Surgical Books – Part I: Classical Period (1450–1730). Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 513–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/502287

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Retief FP, Cilliers L. Breast cancer in antiquity. S Afr Med J 2011; 101(8): 513–5
  2. Hajdu SI. Pathfinders in oncology from ancient times to the end of the Middle Ages. Cancer 2016; 122(11): 1638–46
  3. Emami SA, Sahebkar A, Tayarani-Najaran N, Tayarani-Najaran Z. Cancer and its treatment in main ancient books of Islamic Iranian traditional medicine (7th to 14th Century AD). Iran Red Crescent Med J 2012; 14(12): 747–57
  4. Sakorafas GH, Safioleas M. Breast cancer surgery: an historical narrative. Part I. From prehistoric times to Renaissance. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2009; 18(6):530–44
  5. Elias EA, Elias EE. Elias’ Modern Dictionary Arabic – English. Ninth Edition with Several Additions and Alterations. Cairo: Elias’ Modern Press; 1962
  6. Simpson DP. Cassell’s Latin – English, English – Latin Dictionary. 5th Edition. London: Cassell Ltd, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.; 1979
  7. Lane EW. An Arabic-English Lexicon. In Two Books. Book I.–Part 4. س - ص.London: Williams and Norgate; 1872 [Reprinted] / An Arabic- English Lexicon. In Eight Parts. Part 4 س- ص.Beirut – Lebanon: Librairie du Liban; 1968
  8. Elias Marks. The Aphorisms of Hippocrates: from the Latin version of Verhoofd: with a literal translation on the opposite page and explanatory notes. New York: Colins & Co.; 1817.p.133
  9. Celsus. De Medicina. Translated, Spencer WG. In three volumes. Vol
  10. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press - London: William Heinemann Ltd; 1989.p.129–33
  11. Galen. Method of Medicine. Books 10–14. Translated, Johnston I, Horsley GHR. Cambridge, MA- London, England: Harvard University Press, 2011.p.465–75
  12. Aegineta P. The Seven Books of Paulus Aegina. Translated, Francis Adams. In three volumes. Vol
  13. London: The Sydenham Society; 1846.p.332
  14. Meyerhof M [Sarnelli T]. Djarrāḥ. Lewis B, Pellat Ch, Schacht J, editors. The Encyclopaedia of Islam. New Edition. Vol. II. Leiden: E.J. Brill – London: Luzac & Co.; 1965.p.481–2. 13. ʿAlī b. al-ʿAbbās al-Majūsī. Kāmil al-Ṣināʿat al-Ṭibbiya. Vol
  15. Būlāq: Al-Maṭbaat al-Kubrā al-ʿĀmira; 1294/[1877].p.190–1,467–8
  16. Pormann PE, Savage-Smith E. Medieval Islamic Medicine. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2007.p.61
  17. Albucasis. On surgery and instruments, a definitive edition of the Arabic text with English translation and commentary. Translated, Spink MS, Lewis GL. London: The Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine; 1973.p.150–1,380–1
  18. Uzel İ. Şerefeddin Sabuncuoğlu, C