Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

An Ethical Assessment on Patients InvoluntarilyAdmitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a UniversityHospital

Pages
261–266
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical records of patients who had been involuntarily admitted to auniversity hospital between January-2013 and January-2019 were collected retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Involuntary hospitalizations are commonly applied in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. These practices havebeen controversial since they may pose morally questionable situations. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristicsof patients who were involuntarily admitted to the psychiatry clinic as well as the reasons behind the involuntary admissiondecision and to examine the findings from an ethical point of view. Materials and Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical records of patients who had been involuntarily admitted to auniversity hospital between January-2013 and January-2019 were collected retrospectively. These data were compared withthe variables of the voluntarily admitted patients who were matched with the involuntarily admitted study group in terms ofadmission year, sex, and age. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of socio-demographic characteristics. The fre quency of involuntary hospitalization was found to be higher in patients with psychotic disorders. These patients had a longerduration of hospitalization and were given long-acting antipsychotics more frequently. There was no significant differencebetween the groups in terms of risk of doing harm to oneself/others and treatment needs. Conclusion: Involuntary hospitalizations would contradict further with the principle of respect for patient’s autonomy incomparison with those done due to the risk of doing harm to oneself/others. Prolonged hospitalization and long-acting drugchoices in the absence of the risk of giving harm to oneself/others may contradict basic ethical principles, such as the right tochoose one’s treatment. Caution should be taken against potential ethical issues while considering involuntary hospitalization.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZIL, E. T. Ö., ÇOLAK, B., ÇAKAR, G., KAVAS, M. V. (2022). An Ethical Assessment on Patients InvoluntarilyAdmitted to the Psychiatric Ward of a UniversityHospital. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 261–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/502278

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Borecky A, Thomsen C, Dubov A. Reweighing the ethical tradeoffs in the ınvoluntary hospitalization of suicidal patients. Am J Bioeth 2019; 19(10): 71–83
  2. Aydın R Er., Şehiraltı M. An unresolved issue: Involuntary/compulsory treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Nurses 2010; 1(1): 39–42
  3. Saya A, Brugnoli C, Piazzi G, Liberato D, di Ciaccia G, Niolu C, et al. Criteria, procedures, and future prospects of ınvoluntary treatment in psychiatry around the world: A narrative review. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10: 271
  4. Janssen WA, Noorthoorn EO, de Vries WJ, Hutschemeakers GJ, Lendemeijer HH, Widdershoven GA. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry 2008; 31(6): 463–70
  5. Cougnard A, Kalmi E, Desage A, Misdrahi D, Abalan F, Brun-Rousseau H, et al. Factors influencing compulsory admission in first-admitted subjects with psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004; 39(10): 804–9
  6. Namal A. Psikiyatri tarihçesi ışığında ruh hastalarının zorla tedavilerine etik açıdan genel bir bakış. In: Namal A, Doğan H, Mahmutoğlu FS, Ankara NT, editor. Türk Tıp Etiği ve Tıp Hukuku Araştırmaları Yıllığı. Ankara: Nobel Tıp; 2013. p. 43-8
  7. Oğuz NY, Başaran D. Hukuki ve etik yönüyle zorla hastaneye yatırma. Psikiyatr Psikol Psikofarmakol Derg 1993; 1(4): 367–71
  8. Rains LS, Zenina T, Dias MC, Jones R, Jeffreys S, Branthonne-Foster S, et al. Variations in patterns of involuntary hospitalisation and in legal frameworks: An international comparative study. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6(5): 403–17
  9. Lauber C, Nordt C, Falcato L, Rössler W. Factors ınfluencing social distance toward people with mental ıllness. Community Ment Health J 2004; 40(3): 265–74
  10. Gültekin BK, ÇelIk S, Tihan A, Beşkardeş AF, Sezer U. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of involuntary and voluntary hospitalized psychiatric inpatients in a mental health hospital. Arch Neuropsychiatry 2013; 50(3): 216–21
  11. Yılmaz Y, Saygılı I, Yanartaş Ö, Baykaran MB, Kesebir S, Yildiz D. Psychiatric and legal process in compulsory hospitalization. New Symp 2013; 51(1): 46–50
  12. Potkonjak J, Karlović D. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of involuntary psychiatric inpatients-retrospective study of five-year experience with croatian act on mental health. Acta Clin Croat 2008; 47(3): 141–7
  13. Nawka A, Kalisova L, Raboch J, Giacco D, Cihal L, Onchev G, et al. Gender differences in coerced pat