AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightPatients who were followed-up by eitherallergist/immunologist or chest disease specialist had a two times higher chance of using rescue inhaler therapy in this study.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the inhaler technique used among asthmatic patients admitted tothe emergency department (ED) due to acute asthma attack. Materials and Methods: A total of 303 patients with childhood asthma were enrolled in this study. A survey consistingof 22 questions was conducted on patients and/or their parents during ED visits. Additionally, multiple logistic regressionanalysis was performed to determine the independent predictors affect the use of rescue inhaler treatment. Results: In the study, although 258 patients were prescribed a rescue inhaler asthma treatment, only 212 (85.1%) used thistreatment before the ED visits. Only 193 (78.4%) patients properly used an inhaler device. A total of 61 (23.7%) patients knewthat they had run out of inhalers according to the number of doses recommended in the prospectus. According to multipleanalysis, a close regular follow-up by the primary physician, by either allergist/immunologist or chest disease specialist, andthe administration of inhaler by the parents were identified as independent risk factors for the use of rescue inhaler therapy. Conclusion: Only three-quarters of the patients were found to use rescue inhaler therapy correctly. The improper use of in haler device was more common in adolescents who administered the drug themselves. Patients who were followed-up by eitherallergist/immunologist or chest disease specialist had a two times higher chance of using rescue inhaler therapy in this study.